123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20119977)
1. Extra-departmental anatomic pathology expert consultation inTaiwan: a research grant supported 4-year experience.
Hsu CY; Su IJ; Lin MC; Kuo TT; Jung SM; Ho DM
J Surg Oncol; 2010 Apr; 101(5):430-5. PubMed ID: 20119977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intralaboratory timeliness of surgical pathology reports. Results of two College of American Pathologists Q-Probes studies of biopsies and complex specimens.
Zarbo RJ; Gephardt GN; Howanitz PJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Mar; 120(3):234-44. PubMed ID: 8629897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Second opinion and discrepancy in the diagnosis of soft tissue lesions at surgical pathology.
Sharif MA; Hamdani SN
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2010; 53(3):460-4. PubMed ID: 20699503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of second opinion surgical pathology on the practice of head and neck surgery: a decade experience at a large referral hospital.
Westra WH; Kronz JD; Eisele DW
Head Neck; 2002 Jul; 24(7):684-93. PubMed ID: 12112543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interinstitutional comparison of frozen section consultation in small hospitals: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 18,532 frozen section consultation diagnoses in 233 small hospitals.
Novis DA; Gephardt GN; Zarbo RJ;
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Dec; 120(12):1087-93. PubMed ID: 15456172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality assessment by expert opinion in melanoma pathology: experience of the pathology panel of the Dutch Melanoma Working Party.
Veenhuizen KC; De Wit PE; Mooi WJ; Scheffer E; Verbeek AL; Ruiter DJ
J Pathol; 1997 Jul; 182(3):266-72. PubMed ID: 9349228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mandatory second opinion surgical pathology at a large referral hospital.
Kronz JD; Westra WH; Epstein JI
Cancer; 1999 Dec; 86(11):2426-35. PubMed ID: 10590387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Impact of pathological review by an expert on the diagnosis and management of patients with cancer in Aquitania].
Lapeyrere N; Parrens M; Coindre JM; Soubeyran I; de Mascarel A; Merlio JP; Lebail B; Lepreux S; Jaffre A; Gilleron V; Mathoulin-Pélissier S; Vergier B;
Ann Pathol; 2008 Dec; 28(6):478-85. PubMed ID: 19084716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical pathological second opinion in thyroid malignancy: impact on patients' management and prognosis.
Hamady ZZ; Mather N; Lansdown MR; Davidson L; Maclennan KA
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2005 Feb; 31(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 15642429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interinstitutional comparison of surgical biopsy diagnosis turnaround time: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 5384 surgical biopsies in 157 small hospitals.
Novis DA; Zarbo RJ; Saladino AJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Nov; 122(11):951-6. PubMed ID: 9822122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Indications and immediate patient outcomes of pathology intraoperative consultations. College of American Pathologists/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Outcomes Working Group Study.
Zarbo RJ; Schmidt WA; Bachner P; Howanitz PJ; Meier FA; Schifman RB; Boone DJ; Herron RM
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Jan; 120(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 8554440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A nationwide telepathology consultation and quality control program in China: implementation and result analysis.
Chen J; Jiao Y; Lu C; Zhou J; Zhang Z; Zhou C
Diagn Pathol; 2014; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S2. PubMed ID: 25565398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Second opinion pathology in liver biopsy interpretation.
Bejarano PA; Koehler A; Sherman KE
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Nov; 96(11):3158-64. PubMed ID: 11721765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of interinstitution anatomic pathology consultation on patient care.
Abt AB; Abt LG; Olt GJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Jun; 119(6):514-7. PubMed ID: 7605166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lessons we learn from hematopathology consultation in Taiwan.
Chan C; Huang SW; Su IJ; Chang KC
J Formos Med Assoc; 2013 Dec; 112(12):738-48. PubMed ID: 24231093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Concordance of Expert Consultation Diagnoses in the Review of Pelvic Washing Specimens.
Banet N; Levinson KL; VandenBussche CJ
Acta Cytol; 2015; 59(6):452-6. PubMed ID: 26820245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interinstitutional comparison of frozen section turnaround time. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 32868 frozen sections in 700 hospitals.
Novis DA; Zarbo RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jun; 121(6):559-67. PubMed ID: 9199619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Quality assurance of pathology laboratory, standardization of surgical pathology report and consultation: recent trend].
Namiki T
Rinsho Byori; 1994 Sep; 42(9):897-901. PubMed ID: 7967111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Telehematopathology in a clinical consultative practice.
Fisher SI; Nandedkar MA; Williams BH; Abbondanzo SL
Hum Pathol; 2001 Dec; 32(12):1327-33. PubMed ID: 11774165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In-house daily consensus conference: an important quality control/quality assurance activity--experience at a major referral center.
Khurshid A; Ahmad Z; Qureshi A
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2009; 52(3):325-7. PubMed ID: 19679952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
