123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20119977)
21. Factors that impact turnaround time of surgical pathology specimens in an academic institution.
Patel S; Smith JB; Kurbatova E; Guarner J
Hum Pathol; 2012 Sep; 43(9):1501-5. PubMed ID: 22406373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Characteristics of a telecytology consultation service.
Allen EA; Ollayos CW; Tellado MV; Butler DR; Buckner SB; Williams BH; O'leary TJ
Hum Pathol; 2001 Dec; 32(12):1323-6. PubMed ID: 11774164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Mammographically directed breast biopsies: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of clinical physician expectations and of specimen handling and reporting characteristics in 434 institutions.
Nakhleh RE; Jones B; Zarbo RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jan; 121(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 9111087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Voluntary Second Opinions in Pediatric Bone and Soft Tissue Pathology: A Retrospective Review of 1601 Cases From a Single Mesenchymal Tumor Consultation Service.
Al-Ibraheemi A; Folpe AL
Int J Surg Pathol; 2016 Dec; 24(8):685-691. PubMed ID: 27363432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Study of efficiancy of teleconsultation: the Telepathology Consultation Service of the Professional Assoziation of German Pathologists for the screening program of breast carcinoma].
Schrader T; Hufnagl P; Schlake W; Dietel M
Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol; 2005; 89():211-8. PubMed ID: 18035694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Expert review remains important in the histopathological diagnosis of cutaneous melanocytic lesions.
van Dijk MC; Aben KK; van Hees F; Klaasen A; Blokx WA; Kiemeney LA; Ruiter DJ
Histopathology; 2008 Jan; 52(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 18184263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Interinstitutional comparison of frozen section consultations. A college of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 90,538 cases in 461 institutions.
Gephardt GN; Zarbo RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Sep; 120(9):804-9. PubMed ID: 9140284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Surgical pathology extradepartmental consultation practices.
Azam M; Nakhleh RE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2002 Apr; 126(4):405-12. PubMed ID: 11900562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Increasing agreement over time in interlaboratory anatomic pathology consultation material.
Renshaw AA; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 Aug; 140(2):215-8. PubMed ID: 23897257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Interinstitutional comparison of frozen-section consultation. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probe study of 79,647 consultations in 297 North American institutions.
Zarbo RJ; Hoffman GG; Howanitz PJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1991 Dec; 115(12):1187-94. PubMed ID: 1768206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reproducibility of the diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.
Zaino RJ; Kauderer J; Trimble CL; Silverberg SG; Curtin JP; Lim PC; Gallup DG
Cancer; 2006 Feb; 106(4):804-11. PubMed ID: 16400640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Errors by surgical pathologists in India: results of a questionnaire survey.
Pai SA
Natl Med J India; 2003; 16(4):204-6. PubMed ID: 14606768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Institutional pathology consultation.
Tsung JS
Am J Surg Pathol; 2004 Mar; 28(3):399-402. PubMed ID: 15104305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Impact of second opinion pathology in the definitive management of patients with bladder carcinoma.
Coblentz TR; Mills SE; Theodorescu D
Cancer; 2001 Apr; 91(7):1284-90. PubMed ID: 11283928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Does routine consultation of thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology change surgical management?
Tan YY; Kebebew E; Reiff E; Caron NR; Ogilvie JB; Duh QY; Clark OH; Ljung BM; Miller T
J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Jul; 205(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 17617326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Virtual slide telepathology for an academic teaching hospital surgical pathology quality assurance program.
Graham AR; Bhattacharyya AK; Scott KM; Lian F; Grasso LL; Richter LC; Carpenter JB; Chiang S; Henderson JT; Lopez AM; Barker GP; Weinstein RS
Hum Pathol; 2009 Aug; 40(8):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19540562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Consultative (expert) second opinions in soft tissue pathology. Analysis of problem-prone diagnostic situations.
Arbiser ZK; Folpe AL; Weiss SW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Oct; 116(4):473-6. PubMed ID: 11601130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prostate needle biopsies containing prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical foci suspicious for carcinoma: implications for patient care.
Epstein JI; Herawi M
J Urol; 2006 Mar; 175(3 Pt 1):820-34. PubMed ID: 16469560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical impact of second pathology opinion: a longitudinal study of central genitourinary pathology review before prostate brachytherapy.
Thomas CW; Bainbridge TC; Thomson TA; McGahan CE; Morris WJ
Brachytherapy; 2007; 6(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 17434107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Quality assessment of skin biopsy specimens referred to anonymous consultants.
Penneys NS
Arch Dermatol; 1996 Sep; 132(9):1053-6. PubMed ID: 8795545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
