183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20120262)
1. Modulation of viewpoint effects in object recognition by shape and motion cues.
Vuong QC; Friedman A; Plante C
Perception; 2009; 38(11):1628-48. PubMed ID: 20120262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Facilitation by view combination and coherent motion in dynamic object recognition.
Friedman A; Vuong QC; Spetch M
Vision Res; 2010 Jan; 50(2):202-10. PubMed ID: 19925823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The relative weight of shape and non-rigid motion cues in object perception: a model of the parameters underlying dynamic object discrimination.
Vuong QC; Friedman A; Read JC
J Vis; 2012 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 22427696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic visual information facilitates object recognition from novel viewpoints.
Teramoto W; Riecke BE
J Vis; 2010 Nov; 10(13):11. PubMed ID: 21075836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. View combination in moving objects: the role of motion in discriminating between novel views of similar and distinctive objects by humans and pigeons.
Friedman A; Vuong QC; Spetch ML
Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(6):594-607. PubMed ID: 19232366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rotation direction affects object recognition.
Vuong QC; Tarr MJ
Vision Res; 2004; 44(14):1717-30. PubMed ID: 15136006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Structural similarity and spatiotemporal noise effects on learning dynamic novel objects.
Vuong QC; Tarr MJ
Perception; 2006; 35(4):497-510. PubMed ID: 16700292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implicit encoding of extrinsic object properties in stored representations mediating recognition: evidence from shadow-specific repetition priming.
Leek EC; Davitt LI; Cristino F
Vision Res; 2015 Mar; 108():49-55. PubMed ID: 25637853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of familiarity in the recognition of static and dynamic objects.
Bülthoff I; Newell FN
Prog Brain Res; 2006; 154():315-25. PubMed ID: 17010720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of unattended features on object processing depends on task demand.
Mayer KM; Vuong QC
Vision Res; 2012 Mar; 56():20-7. PubMed ID: 22306678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Similarity dependency of the change in ERP component N1 accompanying with the object recognition learning.
Tokudome W; Wang G
Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 22115890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of surface reflectance on local second order shape estimation in dynamic scenes.
Dövencioğlu DN; Wijntjes MW; Ben-Shahar O; Doerschner K
Vision Res; 2015 Oct; 115(Pt B):218-30. PubMed ID: 25645965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Holistic processing of impossible objects: evidence from Garner's speeded-classification task.
Freud E; Avidan G; Ganel T
Vision Res; 2013 Dec; 93():10-8. PubMed ID: 24121070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Visual representation of malleable and rigid objects that deform as they rotate.
Kourtzi Z; Shiffrar M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Apr; 27(2):335-55. PubMed ID: 11318051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional object recognition learning alters an early ERP component of N1.
Wang G; Bingo J
Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Sep; 121(9):1473-1480. PubMed ID: 20434393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Scene recognition following locomotion around a scene.
Motes MA; Finlay CA; Kozhevnikov M
Perception; 2006; 35(11):1507-20. PubMed ID: 17286121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Representation of shapes, edges, and surfaces across multiple cues in the human visual cortex.
Vinberg J; Grill-Spector K
J Neurophysiol; 2008 Mar; 99(3):1380-93. PubMed ID: 18171705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The contribution of nonrigid motion and shape information to object perception in pigeons and humans.
Nankoo JF; Madan CR; Sawalha J; Wylie DR; Friedman A; Spetch ML; Vuong QC
J Vis; 2017 Jun; 17(6):17. PubMed ID: 28654962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Early development of dynamic shape perception under slit-viewing conditions.
Imura T; Shirai N
Perception; 2014; 43(7):654-62. PubMed ID: 25223109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Judging the shape of moving objects: discriminating dynamic angles.
Kennedy GJ; Orbach HS; Gordon GE; Loffler G
J Vis; 2008 Oct; 8(13):9.1-13. PubMed ID: 19146339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
