217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20120610)
1. Forensic voice comparison and the paradigm shift.
Morrison GS
Sci Justice; 2009 Dec; 49(4):298-308. PubMed ID: 20120610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measuring the validity and reliability of forensic likelihood-ratio systems.
Morrison GS
Sci Justice; 2011 Sep; 51(3):91-8. PubMed ID: 21889105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Distinguishing between forensic science and forensic pseudoscience: testing of validity and reliability, and approaches to forensic voice comparison.
Morrison GS
Sci Justice; 2014 May; 54(3):245-56. PubMed ID: 24796954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A demonstration of the application of the new paradigm for the evaluation of forensic evidence under conditions reflecting those of a real forensic-voice-comparison case.
Enzinger E; Morrison GS; Ochoa F
Sci Justice; 2016 Jan; 56(1):42-57. PubMed ID: 26746825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An empirical estimate of the precision of likelihood ratios from a forensic-voice-comparison system.
Morrison GS; Zhang C; Rose P
Forensic Sci Int; 2011 May; 208(1-3):59-65. PubMed ID: 21131149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation and presentation of forensic DNA evidence in European laboratories.
Taroni F; Lambert JA; Fereday L; Werrett DJ
Sci Justice; 2002; 42(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 12012646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of relevant data, quantitative measurements, and statistical models to calculate a likelihood ratio for a Chinese forensic voice comparison case involving two sisters.
Zhang C; Morrison GS; Enzinger E
Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Oct; 267():115-124. PubMed ID: 27592142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implementing statistical learning methods through Bayesian networks. Part 1: a guide to Bayesian parameter estimation using forensic science data.
Biedermann A; Taroni F; Bozza S
Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Dec; 193(1-3):63-71. PubMed ID: 19833464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Weighing evidence: quantitative measures of the importance of bitemark evidence.
Kittelson JM; Kieser JA; Buckingham DM; Herbison GP
J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2002 Dec; 20(2):31-7. PubMed ID: 12585671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Statistical basis for positive identification in forensic anthropology.
Steadman DW; Adams BJ; Konigsberg LW
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2006 Sep; 131(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 16485302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability and confidence in using a paired comparison paradigm in perceptual voice quality evaluation.
Yiu EM; Chan KM; Mok RS
Clin Linguist Phon; 2007 Feb; 21(2):129-45. PubMed ID: 17364621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Consensus on validation of forensic voice comparison.
Morrison GS; Enzinger E; Hughes V; Jessen M; Meuwly D; Neumann C; Planting S; Thompson WC; van der Vloed D; Ypma RJF; Zhang C; Anonymous A; Anonymous B
Sci Justice; 2021 May; 61(3):299-309. PubMed ID: 33985678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Refining the relevant population in forensic voice comparison - A response to Hicks et alii (2015) The importance of distinguishing information from evidence/observations when formulating propositions.
Morrison GS; Enzinger E; Zhang C
Sci Justice; 2016 Dec; 56(6):492-497. PubMed ID: 27914557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The coming paradigm shift in forensic identification science.
Saks MJ; Koehler JJ
Science; 2005 Aug; 309(5736):892-5. PubMed ID: 16081727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Applications and limitations of Forensic Biomechanics: a Bayesian perspective.
Freeman MD; Kohles SS
J Forensic Leg Med; 2010 Feb; 17(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 20129425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The likelihood approach to compare populations: a study on DNA evidence and pitfalls of intuitions.
Taroni F; Aitken CG
Sci Justice; 1999; 39(4):213-22. PubMed ID: 10795411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. When used in the criminal legal process forensic science shows a bias in favour of the prosecution. Discuss.
Burns DC
Sci Justice; 2001; 41(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 11793884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Forensic hair morphology comparison--a dying art or junk science?
Taupin JM
Sci Justice; 2004; 44(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 15112598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Likelihood-ratio forensic voice comparison using parametric representations of the formant trajectories of diphthongs.
Morrison GS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2387-97. PubMed ID: 19354412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Applied forensic epidemiology: the Bayesian evaluation of forensic evidence in vehicular homicide investigation.
Freeman MD; Rossignol AM; Hand ML
J Forensic Leg Med; 2009 Feb; 16(2):83-92. PubMed ID: 19135003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
