These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20120610)

  • 21. Decision analysis in forensic science.
    Taroni F; Bozza S; Aitken C
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Jul; 50(4):894-905. PubMed ID: 16078494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bayesian framework for the evaluation of fiber evidence in a double murder--a case report.
    Causin V; Schiavone S; Marigo A; Carresi P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2004 May; 141(2-3):159-70. PubMed ID: 15062957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Methods of expressing the strength of expert proof of paternity determination].
    Drábek J
    Cas Lek Cesk; 2002 Jun; 141(12):371-5. PubMed ID: 12238022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Exact solutions to Bayesian and maximum likelihood problems in facial identification when population and error distributions are known.
    Allen RJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Aug; 179(2-3):211-8. PubMed ID: 18639401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. On compensation of mismatched recording conditions in the Bayesian approach for forensic automatic speaker recognition.
    Botti F; Alexander A; Drygajlo A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2004 Dec; 146 Suppl():S101-6. PubMed ID: 15639552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Interpretation of repeat measurement DNA evidence allowing for multiple contributors and population substructure.
    Curran JM; Gill P; Bill MR
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Feb; 148(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 15607589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Detecting deception: the promise and the reality of voice stress analysis.
    Horvath F
    J Forensic Sci; 1982 Apr; 27(2):340-51. PubMed ID: 7047675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Handwriting evidence evaluation based on the shape of characters: application of multivariate likelihood ratios.
    Marquis R; Bozza S; Schmittbuhl M; Taroni F
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56 Suppl 1():S238-42. PubMed ID: 21198625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A model for case assessment and interpretation.
    Cook R; Evett IW; Jackson G; Jones PJ; Lambert JA
    Sci Justice; 1998; 38(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 9800430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Improving efficiency of a small forensic DNA laboratory: validation of robotic assays and evaluation of microcapillary array device.
    Crouse CA; Yeung S; Greenspoon S; McGuckian A; Sikorsky J; Ban J; Mathies R
    Croat Med J; 2005 Aug; 46(4):563-77. PubMed ID: 16100759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Issues and opportunities: the application of the numerical likelihood ratio framework to forensic speaker comparison.
    Gold E; Hughes V
    Sci Justice; 2014 Jul; 54(4):292-9. PubMed ID: 25002047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. New perspectives in forensic anthropology.
    Dirkmaat DC; Cabo LL; Ousley SD; Symes SA
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2008; Suppl 47():33-52. PubMed ID: 19003882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. FaSTR DNA: a new expert system for forensic DNA analysis.
    Power T; McCabe B; Harbison SA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jun; 2(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 19083817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. New perspectives in the use of ink evidence in forensic science: Part I. Development of a quality assurance process for forensic ink analysis by HPTLC.
    Neumann C; Margot P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Mar; 185(1-3):29-37. PubMed ID: 19147310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Using subsampling to estimate the strength of handwriting evidence via score-based likelihood ratios.
    Davis LJ; Saunders CP; Hepler A; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Mar; 216(1-3):146-57. PubMed ID: 22018850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Application of forensic DNA testing in the legal system.
    Primorac D; Schanfield MS
    Croat Med J; 2000 Mar; 41(1):32-46. PubMed ID: 10810166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sample size determination for categorical responses.
    Mavridis D; Aitken CG
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Jan; 54(1):135-51. PubMed ID: 19040667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A GMM-IG framework for selecting genes as expression panel biomarkers.
    Wang M; Chen JY
    Artif Intell Med; 2010; 48(2-3):75-82. PubMed ID: 20004087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of mismatched recording conditions on human and automatic speaker recognition in forensic applications.
    Alexander A; Botti F; Dessimoz D; Drygajlo A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2004 Dec; 146 Suppl():S95-9. PubMed ID: 15639600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Probabilistic reasoning in the law. Part 2: Assessment of probabilities and explanation of the value of trace evidence other than DNA.
    Taroni F; Aitken CG
    Sci Justice; 1998; 38(3):179-88. PubMed ID: 9800433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.