These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20120610)
41. A comparison of two perceptual voice evaluation training programs for naive listeners. Chan KM; Yiu EM J Voice; 2006 Jun; 20(2):229-41. PubMed ID: 16139475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Object-oriented Bayesian networks for complex forensic DNA profiling problems. Dawid AP; Mortera J; Vicard P Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jul; 169(2-3):195-205. PubMed ID: 17055679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Making tracks: the forensic analysis of footprints and footwear impressions. Naples VL; Miller JS Anat Rec B New Anat; 2004 Jul; 279(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 15278937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Development of an Alu-based, QSY 7-labeled primer PCR method for quantitation of human DNA in forensic samples. Nicklas JA; Buel E J Forensic Sci; 2003 Mar; 48(2):282-91. PubMed ID: 12664984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Value of DNA tests: a decision perspective. Taroni F; Bozza S; Bernard M; Champod C J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jan; 52(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 17209907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. How the probability of a false positive affects the value of DNA evidence. Thompson WC; Taroni F; Aitken CG J Forensic Sci; 2003 Jan; 48(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 12570198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Advancing a paradigm shift in evaluation of forensic evidence: The rise of forensic data science. Morrison GS Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2022; 5():100270. PubMed ID: 35634572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Paradigm of forensic medicine--trends of development]. Nasiłowski W Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2007; 57(2):178-9. PubMed ID: 17691170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The use of the likelihood ratio for evaluative and investigative purposes in comparative forensic handwriting examination. Taroni F; Marquis R; Schmittbuhl M; Biedermann A; Thiéry A; Bozza S Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jan; 214(1-3):189-94. PubMed ID: 21907508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. TWGDAM validation of AmpFlSTR PCR amplification kits for forensic DNA casework. Holt CL; Buoncristiani M; Wallin JM; Nguyen T; Lazaruk KD; Walsh PS J Forensic Sci; 2002 Jan; 47(1):66-96. PubMed ID: 12064672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Studies on voice identification]. Yang X; Shi S; Ling J Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1998; 14(4):224-5, 228, 252. PubMed ID: 11938906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Two heads are better than one: Dual systems obtain better performance in facial comparison. Li Z; Xie L; Song H Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Dec; 353():111879. PubMed ID: 37948948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. What does method validation look like for forensic voice comparison by a human expert? Kirchhübel C; Brown G; Foulkes P Sci Justice; 2023 Mar; 63(2):251-257. PubMed ID: 36870704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]