204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20120710)
1. [Evaluation of soft tissue changes after mandibular prognathism surgery].
Gaszyńska E; Kozakiewicz M
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2009 Dec; 27(162):474-7. PubMed ID: 20120710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Complications of surgical treatment of mandibular prognathism].
Gaszyńska E; Kozakiewicz M
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2008 Jul; 25(145):27-31. PubMed ID: 18839610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A retrospective analysis of the stability and relapse of soft and hard tissue change after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular setback of 64 Taiwanese patients.
Chou JI; Fong HJ; Kuang SH; Gi LY; Hwang FY; Lai YC; Chang RC; Kao SY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 63(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 15742287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Soft tissue profile changes after vertical ramus osteotomy.
Naoumova J; Söderfeldt B; Lindman R
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):359-65. PubMed ID: 18524760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Skeletal changes after modified intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism.
Lai SS; Tseng YC; Huang IY; Yang YH; Shen YS; Chen CM
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 17223511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stability of skeletal Class II correction with 2 surgical techniques: the sagittal split ramus osteotomy and the total mandibular subapical alveolar osteotomy.
Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Kaczynski R; Shunock M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Aug; 120(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 11500654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stability of soft tissue profile after mandibular setback in sagittal split osteotomies: a longitudinal and long-term follow-up study.
Joss CU; Vassalli IM; Thüer UW
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Aug; 66(8):1610-6. PubMed ID: 18634948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stability of hard tissue profile after mandibular setback in sagittal split osteotomies: a longitudinal and long-term follow-up study.
Joss CU; Thüer UW
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):352-8. PubMed ID: 18678756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Changes of transverse mandibular width after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy.
Jung YS; Kim SY; Park SY; Choi YD; Park HS
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 20188605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hard and soft tissue changes after correction of mandibular prognathism and facial asymmetry by mandibular setback surgery: three-dimensional analysis using computerized tomography.
Jung YJ; Kim MJ; Baek SH
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):763-771.e8. PubMed ID: 19272814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Soft tissue profile changes following mandibular advancement and setback surgery an average of 12 years postoperatively.
Eggensperger NM; Lieger O; Thüer U; Iizuka T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Nov; 65(11):2301-10. PubMed ID: 17954329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The long term stability after orthognathic surgery in prognathic patients with mandibular asymmetry].
Lai W; Kazuhiro Y; Kooji H; Ritsuo T; Tadaharu K
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2003 Jan; 34(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 15600196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of masticatory function after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for patients with mandibular prognathism.
Kikuta T; Hara I; Seto T; Yoshioka I; Nakashima T; Yasumitsu C
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 8006486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Berger JL; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; George C; Kaczynski R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. PubMed ID: 15821690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of skeletal and surgical factors related to relapse of mandibular setback surgery using the bioabsorbable plate.
Kim YK; Kim YJ; Yun PY; Kim JW
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 37(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 19056290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term stability of mandibular setback surgery: a follow-up of 80 bilateral sagittal split osteotomy patients.
Mobarak KA; Krogstad O; Espeland L; Lyberg T
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2000; 15(2):83-95. PubMed ID: 11307427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing the effect of 3 orthognathic surgical methods on the mandibular range of movement.
Yazdani J; Ebrahimi H; Talesh KT; Khashabi E; Pourshahidi S; Tadbir AA
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):703-5. PubMed ID: 20485032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional computer-graphic demonstration of facial soft tissue changes in mandibular prognathic patients after mandibular sagittal ramus osteotomy.
Techalertpaisarn P; Kuroda T
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1998; 13(3):217-25. PubMed ID: 9835821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Positional stability following intentional posterior ostectomy of the distal segment in bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism.
Kim MJ; Kim SG; Park YW
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2002 Feb; 30(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 12064881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changes in bite force and dentoskeletal morphology in prognathic patients after orthognathic surgery.
Harada K; Kikuchi T; Morishima S; Sato M; Ohkura K; Omura K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Jun; 95(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 12789142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
