These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20120822)

  • 21. Using dynamic Brownian bridge movement modelling to measure temporal patterns of habitat selection.
    Byrne ME; Clint McCoy J; Hinton JW; Chamberlain MJ; Collier BA
    J Anim Ecol; 2014 Sep; 83(5):1234-43. PubMed ID: 24460723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accounting for individual-specific variation in habitat-selection studies: Efficient estimation of mixed-effects models using Bayesian or frequentist computation.
    Muff S; Signer J; Fieberg J
    J Anim Ecol; 2020 Jan; 89(1):80-92. PubMed ID: 31454066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sampling rate and misidentification of Lévy and non-Lévy movement paths: comment.
    Auger-Méthé M; St Clair CC; Lewis MA; Derocher AE
    Ecology; 2011 Aug; 92(8):1699-701; discussion 1701-2. PubMed ID: 21905436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A re-evaluation of a case-control model with contaminated controls for resource selection studies.
    Rota CT; Millspaugh JJ; Kesler DC; Lehman CP; Rumble MA; Jachowski CM
    J Anim Ecol; 2013 Nov; 82(6):1165-73. PubMed ID: 23701233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A multistate Langevin diffusion for inferring behavior-specific habitat selection and utilization distributions.
    McClintock BT; Lander ME
    Ecology; 2024 Jan; 105(1):e4186. PubMed ID: 37794831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Estimating animal resource selection from telemetry data using point process models.
    Johnson DS; Hooten MB; Kuhn CE
    J Anim Ecol; 2013 Nov; 82(6):1155-64. PubMed ID: 23800202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reconciling resource utilization and resource selection functions.
    Hooten MB; Hanks EM; Johnson DS; Alldredge MW
    J Anim Ecol; 2013 Nov; 82(6):1146-54. PubMed ID: 23574332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Inference in MCMC step selection models.
    Michelot T; Blackwell PG; Chamaillé-Jammes S; Matthiopoulos J
    Biometrics; 2020 Jun; 76(2):438-447. PubMed ID: 31654395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Estimating habitat selection when GPS fix success is less than 100%.
    Nielson RM; Manly BF; McDonald LL; Sawyer H; McDonald TL
    Ecology; 2009 Oct; 90(10):2956-62. PubMed ID: 19886504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Estimating abundance of an open population with an N-mixture model using auxiliary data on animal movements.
    Ketz AC; Johnson TL; Monello RJ; Mack JA; George JL; Kraft BR; Wild MA; Hooten MB; Hobbs NT
    Ecol Appl; 2018 Apr; 28(3):816-825. PubMed ID: 29405475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Differential resource selection within shared habitat types across spatial scales in sympatric toads.
    Indermaur L; Winzeler T; Schmidt BR; Tockner K; Schaub M
    Ecology; 2009 Dec; 90(12):3430-44. PubMed ID: 20120811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Occupancy modeling species-environment relationships with non-ignorable survey designs.
    Irvine KM; Rodhouse TJ; Wright WJ; Olsen AR
    Ecol Appl; 2018 Sep; 28(6):1616-1625. PubMed ID: 29802750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Integrated animal movement and spatial capture-recapture models: Simulation, implementation, and inference.
    Gardner B; McClintock BT; Converse SJ; Hostetter NJ
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3771. PubMed ID: 35638187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Movement reveals scale dependence in habitat selection of a large ungulate.
    Northrup JM; Anderson CR; Hooten MB; Wittemyer G
    Ecol Appl; 2016 Dec; 26(8):2744-2755. PubMed ID: 27859842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Analyzing animal movements using Brownian bridges.
    Horne JS; Garton EO; Krone SM; Lewis JS
    Ecology; 2007 Sep; 88(9):2354-63. PubMed ID: 17918412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accounting for location uncertainty in azimuthal telemetry data improves ecological inference.
    Gerber BD; Hooten MB; Peck CP; Rice MB; Gammonley JH; Apa AD; Davis AJ
    Mov Ecol; 2018; 6():14. PubMed ID: 30062012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Linking resource selection and step selection models for habitat preferences in animals.
    Michelot T; Blackwell PG; Matthiopoulos J
    Ecology; 2019 Jan; 100(1):e02452. PubMed ID: 30047993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Confronting spatial capture-recapture models with realistic animal movement simulations.
    Theng M; Milleret C; Bracis C; Cassey P; Delean S
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3676. PubMed ID: 35253209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Estimating resource selection with count data.
    Nielson RM; Sawyer H
    Ecol Evol; 2013 Jul; 3(7):2233-40. PubMed ID: 23919165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Correlation and studies of habitat selection: problem, red herring or opportunity?
    Fieberg J; Matthiopoulos J; Hebblewhite M; Boyce MS; Frair JL
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2010 Jul; 365(1550):2233-44. PubMed ID: 20566500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.