These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20121306)

  • 1. Effects of semantic context and feedback on perceptual learning of speech processed through an acoustic simulation of a cochlear implant.
    Loebach JL; Pisoni DB; Svirsky MA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Feb; 36(1):224-34. PubMed ID: 20121306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Making Sense of Sentences: Top-Down Processing of Speech by Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    Moberly AC; Reed J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Aug; 62(8):2895-2905. PubMed ID: 31330118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transfer of auditory perceptual learning with spectrally reduced speech to speech and nonspeech tasks: implications for cochlear implants.
    Loebach JL; Pisoni DB; Svirsky MA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):662-74. PubMed ID: 19773659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual learning of spectrally degraded speech and environmental sounds.
    Loebach JL; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1126-39. PubMed ID: 18247913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does Signal Degradation Affect Top-Down Processing of Speech?
    Wagner A; Pals C; de Blecourt CM; Sarampalis A; Başkent D
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():297-306. PubMed ID: 27080670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual Discrimination of Speaking Style Under Cochlear Implant Simulation.
    Tamati TN; Janse E; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 29742545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptual adaptation to spectrally shifted vowels: training with nonlexical labels.
    Li T; Fu QJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Mar; 8(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17131213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptual learning of temporally interrupted spectrally degraded speech.
    Benard MR; Başkent D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1344. PubMed ID: 25190407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interactions between unsupervised learning and the degree of spectral mismatch on short-term perceptual adaptation to spectrally shifted speech.
    Li T; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):238-49. PubMed ID: 19194293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring effectiveness of semantic cues in degraded English sentences in non-native listeners.
    Shi LF
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 24003982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of speech recognition and localization performance in bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users matched on duration of deafness and age at implantation.
    Dunn CC; Tyler RS; Oakley S; Gantz BJ; Noble W
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):352-9. PubMed ID: 18453885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recognition of emotional prosody by Mandarin-speaking adults with cochlear implants.
    Pak CL; Katz WF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Aug; 146(2):EL165. PubMed ID: 31472572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
    Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Baskent D; Wang X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acoustic and perceptual appraisal of speech production in pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Poissant SF; Peters KA; Robb MP
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jul; 70(7):1195-203. PubMed ID: 16460814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recognition of lexically controlled words and sentences by children with normal hearing and children with cochlear implants.
    Eisenberg LS; Martinez AS; Holowecky SR; Pogorelsky S
    Ear Hear; 2002 Oct; 23(5):450-62. PubMed ID: 12411778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acoustic simulation experiments with preprocessed speech for an 8-channel cochlear implant.
    Marquet J; Van Durme M; Lammens J; Collier R; Peeters S; Bosiers W
    Audiology; 1986; 25(6):353-62. PubMed ID: 3593094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perception and production of /r/ allophones improve with hearing from a cochlear implant.
    Matthies ML; Guenther FH; Denny M; Perkell JS; Burton E; Vick J; Lane H; Tiede M; Zandipour M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):3191-202. PubMed ID: 19045803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of stimulus repetition and training schedule on the perceptual learning of time-compressed speech and its transfer.
    Banai K; Lavner Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2944-2955. PubMed ID: 31161493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech recognition under conditions of frequency-place compression and expansion.
    Baskent D; Shannon RV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2064-76. PubMed ID: 12703717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.