265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20121359)
1. Comparative fixation methods of cervical disc arthroplasty versus conventional methods of anterior cervical arthrodesis: serration, teeth, keels, or screws?
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Feb; 12(2):214-20. PubMed ID: 20121359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screw orientation and plate type (variable- vs. fixed-angle) effect strength of fixation for in vitro biomechanical testing of the Synthes CSLP.
Dipaola CP; Jacobson JA; Awad H; Conrad BP; Rechtine GR
Spine J; 2008; 8(5):717-22. PubMed ID: 17983846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Experimental fusion of the sheep cervical spine. Part I: Effect of cage design on interbody fusion].
Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Scholz M; Schäfer J; Schollmeier G; Schnake KJ; Bail H; Duda G; Haas NP
Chirurg; 2002 Sep; 73(9):909-17. PubMed ID: 12297957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical evaluation of the pullout strength of cervical screws.
Conrad BP; Cordista AG; Horodyski M; Rechtine GR
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2005 Dec; 18(6):506-10. PubMed ID: 16306839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.
Burval DJ; McLain RF; Milks R; Inceoglu S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17471088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Screw pull-out force is dependent on screw orientation in an anterior cervical plate construct.
DiPaola CP; Jacobson JA; Awad H; Conrad BP; Rechtine GR
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Jul; 20(5):369-73. PubMed ID: 17607102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of iliac screw insertion depth on the stability and strength of lumbo-iliac fixation constructs: an anatomical and biomechanical study.
Zheng ZM; Yu BS; Chen H; Aladin DM; Zhang KB; Zhang JF; Liu H; Luk KD; Lu WW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(16):E565-72. PubMed ID: 19770599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Mid-term results of 360-degree lumbar spondylodesis with the use of a tantalum implant for disc replacement].
Matejka J; Zeman J; Belatka J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Oct; 76(5):388-93. PubMed ID: 19912702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interference screw fixation of cervical grafts. A combined in vitro biomechanical and in vivo animal study.
Vazquez-Seoane P; Yoo J; Zou D; Fay LA; Fredrickson BE; Handal JC; Yuan HA; Edwards WT
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Jun; 18(8):946-54. PubMed ID: 8367782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors affecting sagittal malalignment due to cage subsidence in standalone cage assisted anterior cervical fusion.
Barsa P; Suchomel P
Eur Spine J; 2007 Sep; 16(9):1395-400. PubMed ID: 17221174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does rigid instrumentation increase the fusion rate in one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?
Samartzis D; Shen FH; Lyon C; Phillips M; Goldberg EJ; An HS
Spine J; 2004; 4(6):636-43. PubMed ID: 15541695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Anterior cervical fusion on the lower cervical spine: own clinical experience].
Pazdernyik S; Sándor L; Elek P; Barzó P
Ideggyogy Sz; 2010 Jan; 63(1-2):25-37. PubMed ID: 20420121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo experimental study of hat type cervical intervertebral fusion cage (HCIFC).
Gu YT; Yao ZJ; Jia LS; Qi J; Wang J
Int Orthop; 2010 Dec; 34(8):1251-9. PubMed ID: 20195596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new stand-alone cervical anterior interbody fusion device: biomechanical comparison with established anterior cervical fixation devices.
Scholz M; Reyes PM; Schleicher P; Sawa AG; Baek S; Kandziora F; Marciano FF; Crawford NR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 19139665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.
Sasso RC; Best NM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stand-alone interbody cage versus anterior cervical plate for treatment of cervical disc herniation: sequential changes in cage subsidence.
Fujibayashi S; Neo M; Nakamura T
J Clin Neurosci; 2008 Sep; 15(9):1017-22. PubMed ID: 18653347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anterior vertebral body screw pullout testing with the hollow modular anchorage system--a comparative in vitro study.
Schramm M; Krummbein S; Kraus H; Pitto RP; Schmidt R
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2003 Dec; 48(12):356-61. PubMed ID: 14740524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
