These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20121585)

  • 1. Navigation of artificial disc replacement: evaluation in a cadaver study.
    Kafchitsas K; Rauschmann M
    Comput Aided Surg; 2009; 14(1-3):28-36. PubMed ID: 20121585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Insertion of the artificial disc replacement: a cadaver study comparing the conventional surgical technique and the use of a navigation system.
    Rauschmann MA; Thalgott J; Fogarty M; Nichlos M; Kleinszig G; Knap M; Kafchitsas K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(10):1110-5. PubMed ID: 19404182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Holsapple G; Adams K; Blumenthal S; Guyer RD; Dmietriev A; Maxwell JH; Regan JJ; Isaza J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1576-83; discussion E388-90. PubMed ID: 16025025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.
    Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Banco RJ; Bitan FD; Cappuccino A; Geisler FH; Hochschuler SH; Holt RT; Jenis LG; Majd ME; Regan JJ; Tromanhauser SG; Wong DC; Blumenthal SL
    Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical evaluation of the kinematics of the cadaver lumbar spine following disc replacement with the ProDisc-L prosthesis.
    Demetropoulos CK; Sengupta DK; Knaub MA; Wiater BP; Abjornson C; Truumees E; Herkowitz HN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 20042953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.
    Sasso RC; Best NM
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Mid-term results of 360-degree lumbar spondylodesis with the use of a tantalum implant for disc replacement].
    Matejka J; Zeman J; Belatka J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Oct; 76(5):388-93. PubMed ID: 19912702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of computerized image guidance in lumbar disk arthroplasty.
    Smith HE; Vaccaro AR; Yuan PS; Papadopoulos S; Sasso R
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Feb; 19(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 16462214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of parallax on intraoperative positioning of the Charité artificial disc.
    Petilon J; Hardenbrook M; Sukovich W
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Aug; 21(6):422-9. PubMed ID: 18679098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rotation effect and anatomic landmark accuracy for midline placement of lumbar artificial disc under fluoroscopy.
    Mikhael M; Brooks JT; Akpolat YT; Cheng WK
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Mar; 26(3):794-798. PubMed ID: 25971356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of lumbar total disc arthroplasty on the segmental motion and intradiscal pressure at the adjacent level: an in vitro biomechanical study: presented at the 2008 Joint Spine Section Meeting Laboratory investigation.
    Ingalhalikar AV; Reddy CG; Lim TH; Torner JC; Hitchon PW
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Dec; 11(6):715-23. PubMed ID: 19951025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of thoracic vertebral body screw placement using standard fluoroscopy, fluoroscopic image guidance, and computed tomographic image guidance: a cadaver study.
    Mirza SK; Wiggins GC; Kuntz C; York JE; Bellabarba C; Knonodi MA; Chapman JR; Shaffrey CI
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Feb; 28(4):402-13. PubMed ID: 12590219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Centering of cervical disc replacements: usefulness of intraoperative anteroposterior fluoroscopic guidance to center cervical disc replacements: study on 20 discocerv (scient'x prosthesis).
    Kouyoumdjian P; Bronsard N; Vital JM; Gille O
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1572-7. PubMed ID: 19564767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Functional and radiological outcomes of 360 degrees fusion of three or more motion levels in the lumbar spine for degenerative disc disease.
    Suratwala SJ; Pinto MR; Gilbert TJ; Winter RB; Wroblewski JM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(10):E351-8. PubMed ID: 19404164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of single-time, multilevel registration in image-guided spinal surgery.
    Papadopoulos EC; Girardi FP; Sama A; Sandhu HS; Cammisa FP
    Spine J; 2005; 5(3):263-7; discussion 268. PubMed ID: 15863081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Cunningham BW; Gordon JD; Dmitriev AE; Hu N; McAfee PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S110-7. PubMed ID: 14560182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preventive effect of artificial ligamentous stabilization on the upper adjacent segment impairment following posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Imagama S; Kawakami N; Matsubara Y; Kanemura T; Tsuji T; Ohara T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(25):2775-81. PubMed ID: 19940736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality of spinal motion with cervical disk arthroplasty: computer-aided radiographic analysis.
    Powell JW; Sasso RC; Metcalf NH; Anderson PA; Hipp JA
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Apr; 23(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 20051921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Segmental contribution toward total lumbar range of motion in disc replacement and fusions: a comparison of operative and adjacent levels.
    Auerbach JD; Jones KJ; Milby AH; Anakwenze OA; Balderston RA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 19927100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disc replacement adjacent to cervical fusion: a biomechanical comparison of hybrid construct versus two-level fusion.
    Lee MJ; Dumonski M; Phillips FM; Voronov LI; Renner SM; Carandang G; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Nov; 36(23):1932-9. PubMed ID: 21289581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.