These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20121873)

  • 1. The role of landmarks and boundaries in the development of spatial memory.
    Bullens J; Nardini M; Doeller CF; Braddick O; Postma A; Burgess N
    Dev Sci; 2010 Jan; 13(1):170-80. PubMed ID: 20121873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of local and distal landmarks in the development of object location memory.
    Bullens J; Klugkist I; Postma A
    Dev Psychol; 2011 Nov; 47(6):1515-24. PubMed ID: 21942661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of spatial stability and cue type on spatial learning: Implications for theories of parallel memory systems.
    Buckley MG; Austen JM; Myles LAM; Smith S; Ihssen N; Lew AR; McGregor A
    Cognition; 2021 Sep; 214():104802. PubMed ID: 34225248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The developmental trajectory of intramaze and extramaze landmark biases in spatial navigation: An unexpected journey.
    Buckley MG; Haselgrove M; Smith AD
    Dev Psychol; 2015 Jun; 51(6):771-91. PubMed ID: 25844850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial relational learning and memory abilities do not differ between men and women in a real-world, open-field environment.
    Banta Lavenex P; Lavenex P
    Behav Brain Res; 2010 Feb; 207(1):125-37. PubMed ID: 19800920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The emergence of flexible spatial strategies in young children.
    Waismeyer AS; Jacobs LF
    Dev Psychol; 2013 Feb; 49(2):232-42. PubMed ID: 22545846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of cue types on sex differences in human spatial memory.
    Chai XJ; Jacobs LF
    Behav Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 208(2):336-42. PubMed ID: 19963014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shape shifting: Local landmarks interfere with navigation by, and recognition of, global shape.
    Buckley MG; Smith AD; Haselgrove M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Mar; 40(2):492-510. PubMed ID: 24245537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Memory for spatial location and object-place associations are differently processed by the hippocampal formation, parahippocampal areas TH/TF and perirhinal cortex.
    Bachevalier J; Nemanic S
    Hippocampus; 2008; 18(1):64-80. PubMed ID: 17924520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cue integration in spatial search for jointly learned landmarks but not for separately learned landmarks.
    Du Y; McMillan N; Madan CR; Spetch ML; Mou W
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1857-1871. PubMed ID: 28504533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of experience on children's ability to show response and place learning.
    Bullens J; Székely E; Vedder A; Postma A
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2010 Nov; 28(Pt 4):909-20. PubMed ID: 21121474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of cue placement on the relative dominance of boundaries and landmark arrays in goal localization.
    Zhou R; Mou W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Nov; 72(11):2614-2631. PubMed ID: 31104568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of reference frames and number of cues available on the spatial orientation of males and females in a virtual memory task.
    Cánovas R; García RF; Cimadevilla JM
    Behav Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 216(1):116-21. PubMed ID: 20655953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Feature-positive discriminations during a spatial-search task with humans.
    Ruprecht CM; Wolf JE; Quintana NI; Leising KJ
    Learn Behav; 2014 Sep; 42(3):215-30. PubMed ID: 24903597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cue reliability and a landmark stability heuristic determine relative weighting between egocentric and allocentric visual information in memory-guided reach.
    Byrne PA; Crawford JD
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Jun; 103(6):3054-69. PubMed ID: 20457858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of salient and non-salient visuospatial cues by rats in the Morris Water Maze.
    Young GS; Choleris E; Kirkland JB
    Physiol Behav; 2006 Apr; 87(4):794-9. PubMed ID: 16516936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Very young children's memory for the location of objects in a large-scale environment.
    DeLoache JS; Brown AL
    Child Dev; 1983 Aug; 54(4):888-97. PubMed ID: 6617310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes in attention to relevant and irrelevant stimuli during spatial learning.
    Cuell SF; Good MA; Dopson JC; Pearce JM; Horne MR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Jul; 38(3):244-54. PubMed ID: 22642672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Learned predictiveness training modulates biases towards using boundary or landmark cues during navigation.
    Buckley MG; Smith AD; Haselgrove M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(6):1183-202. PubMed ID: 25409751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of spatial memory and spatial orientation in preschoolers and primary school children.
    Lehnung M; Leplow B; Friege L; Herzog A; Ferstl R; Mehdorn M
    Br J Psychol; 1998 Aug; 89 ( Pt 3)():463-80. PubMed ID: 9734301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.