275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20122469)
21. Child restraint in the acute setting of pediatric nursing: an extraordinarily stressful event.
Brenner M
Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs; 2007; 30(1-2):29-37. PubMed ID: 17613140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Ethics in pediatric nursing, respect for decision making].
Grenouiller F
Soins Pediatr Pueric; 2005 Apr; (223):39-43. PubMed ID: 15869036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [The nurse's role in an research ethics committee].
Perreault E; Bellemare D
Perspect Infirm; 2006; 3(4):43-5. PubMed ID: 16610493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Informed consent for pediatric research: is it really possible?
Kodish E
J Pediatr; 2003 Feb; 142(2):89-90. PubMed ID: 12584521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Children as research subjects: a proposal to revise the current federal regulations using a moral framework.
Ross LF
Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1997; 8(1):159-76. PubMed ID: 16528858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [Deontological guidelines applicable to nursing research].
Rech Soins Infirm; 1996 Dec; (47):67-72. PubMed ID: 16737043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Informed consent in pediatric oncology: a nursing perspective.
Ruccione KS
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs; 1994 Jul; 11(3):128-33. PubMed ID: 7917140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The flip of the coin: exempt, expedited, or full IRB review?
Bliss-Holtz J
AACN Adv Crit Care; 2007; 18(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 17473550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Ethics in neonatal pain research.
Axelin A; Salanterä S
Nurs Ethics; 2008 Jul; 15(4):492-9. PubMed ID: 18515438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Medicine vs. prayer: the case of Kara Neumann.
O'Mathúna DP; Lang K
Pediatr Nurs; 2008; 34(5):413-6. PubMed ID: 19051845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The role of institutional review boards in protecting human subjects: are we really ready to fix a broken system?
Beh HG
Law Psychol Rev; 2002; 26(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 16514756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Are pediatric nurses advocating for "Generation M2"? The impact of technology use on children.
Goldschmidt K
J Pediatr Nurs; 2010 Aug; 25(4):304-6. PubMed ID: 20620813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Examining advocacy and case management in managed care.
Coffman S
Pediatr Nurs; 2001; 27(3):287-9, 304. PubMed ID: 12964669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. When do the federal regulations allow placebo-controlled trials in children?
Miller FG; Wendler D; Wilfond B
J Pediatr; 2003 Feb; 142(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 12584527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Institutional review boards, research on children, and informed consent of parents: walking the tightrope between encouraging vital experimentation and protecting subjects' rights.
Katerberg RJ
J Coll Univ Law; 1998; 24(3):545-79. PubMed ID: 16331880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Advocate for children's health.
Newland J
Nurse Pract; 2007 Mar; 32(3):7. PubMed ID: 17473799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. In loco parentis. Minimal risk as an ethical threshold for research upon children.
Freedman B; Fuks A; Weijer C
Hastings Cent Rep; 1993; 23(2):13-9. PubMed ID: 8463083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Recent developments in the protection of pediatric research subjects.
Flotte TR; Frentzen B; Humphries MR; Rosenbloom AL
J Pediatr; 2006 Sep; 149(3):285-286. PubMed ID: 16939731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. NAPNAP healthy eating and activity together (HEAT) initiative.
National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & Practitioners
J Pediatr Health Care; 2006; 20(2 Suppl):S3-63. PubMed ID: 16749238
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Enrolling children in the State Children's Health Insurance Program (S-CHIP): can we do more?
Hodgson C
J Pediatr Health Care; 2005; 19(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 15662355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
