202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20123366)
1. Tomographic volume evaluation of submandibular fossa in patients requiring dental implants.
Parnia F; Fard EM; Mahboub F; Hafezeqoran A; Gavgani FE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jan; 109(1):e32-6. PubMed ID: 20123366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of mandibular posterior regional landmarks using cone-beam computed tomography in dental implant surgery.
de Souza LA; Souza Picorelli Assis NM; Ribeiro RA; Pires Carvalho AC; Devito KL
Ann Anat; 2016 May; 205():53-9. PubMed ID: 26851559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of Lingual Concavities in Submandibular Fossa Region in Patients requiring Dental Implants-A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.
Rajput BS; Merita S; Parihar AS; Vyas T; Kaur P; Chansoria S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1329-1333. PubMed ID: 30602636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tomographic evaluation on bone morphology in posterior mandibular region for safe placement of dental implant.
Yildiz S; Bayar GR; Guvenc I; Kocabiyik N; Cömert A; Yazar F
Surg Radiol Anat; 2015 Mar; 37(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 25078676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk assessment of lingual plate perforation in posterior mandibular region: a virtual implant placement study using cone-beam computed tomography.
Chan HL; Benavides E; Yeh CY; Fu JH; Rudek IE; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2011 Jan; 82(1):129-35. PubMed ID: 20653440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retrospective study of the bone morphology in the posterior mandibular region. Evaluation of the prevalence and the degree of lingual concavity and their possible complications.
Herranz-Aparicio J; Marques J; Almendros-Marqués N; Gay-Escoda C
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2016 Nov; 21(6):e731-e736. PubMed ID: 27694785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Morphology and dimensions of the mandibular jaw bone in the interforaminal region in patients requiring implants in the distal areas.
Quirynen M; Mraiwa N; van Steenberghe D; Jacobs R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2003 Jun; 14(3):280-5. PubMed ID: 12755778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CBCT quantitative evaluation of mandibular lingual concavities in dental implant patients.
Kamburoğlu K; Acar B; Yüksel S; Paksoy CS
Surg Radiol Anat; 2015 Dec; 37(10):1209-15. PubMed ID: 25994600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lingual concavities in the mandible: a morphological study using cross-sectional analysis determined by CBCT.
Nickenig HJ; Wichmann M; Eitner S; Zöller JE; Kreppel M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 43(2):254-9. PubMed ID: 25547216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Evaluation of the Submandibular Fossa in a Group of Dental Implant Patients.
Nilsun B; Canan B; Evren H; Kaan O
Implant Dent; 2019 Aug; 28(4):329-339. PubMed ID: 31344015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cross-sectional analysis of the mandibular lingual concavity using cone beam computed tomography.
Chan HL; Brooks SL; Fu JH; Yeh CY; Rudek I; Wang HL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Feb; 22(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 21044167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk assessment of inferior alveolar nerve injury for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a virtual implant placement study.
Lin MH; Mau LP; Cochran DL; Shieh YS; Huang PH; Huang RY
J Dent; 2014 Mar; 42(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 24394585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk of lingual plate perforation during implant placement in the posterior mandible: a human cadaver study.
Leong DJ; Chan HL; Yeh CY; Takarakis N; Fu JH; Wang HL
Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 21811168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of anatomic variations of mandibular lingual concavities from cone beam computed tomography scans in a Malaysian population.
Tan WY; Ng JZL; Ajit Bapat R; Vijaykumar Chaubal T; Kishor Kanneppedy S
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):766.e1-766.e8. PubMed ID: 33752904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the frequency of deep lingual concavities in 826 posterior mandible sockets.
Bodart L; Hanken H; Smeets R; Gosau M; Li C; Kluwe L; Klatt J
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2020 Nov; 48(11):1045-1051. PubMed ID: 33012600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk of lingual plate perforation for virtual immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: A computer simulation study.
Huang RY; Cochran DL; Cheng WC; Lin MH; Fan WH; Sung CE; Mau LP; Huang PH; Shieh YS
J Am Dent Assoc; 2015 Oct; 146(10):735-42. PubMed ID: 26409983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Supramandibular canal portion superior to the fossa of the submaxillary gland: a tomographic evaluation of the cross-sectional dimension in the molar region.
Yu DC; Friedland BD; Karimbux NY; Guze KA
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Oct; 15(5):750-8. PubMed ID: 22236400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anatomical landmarks of mandibular interforaminal region related to dental implant placement with 3D CBCT: comparison between edentulous and dental mandibles.
Sener E; Onem E; Akar GC; Govsa F; Ozer MA; Pinar Y; Mert A; Baksi Sen BG
Surg Radiol Anat; 2018 Jun; 40(6):615-623. PubMed ID: 29124343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
Ekestubbe A
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An illustrative study of the role of tomograms for the placement of dental implants.
Thunthy KH; Yeadon WR; Nasr HF
J Oral Implantol; 2003; 29(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 12760453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
