338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20124918)
1. Postoperative segmental malalignment after surgery with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: is it related to the mechanics and design of the prosthesis?
Walraevens JR; Liu B; Sloten JV; Demaerel P; Goffin J
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):372-6. PubMed ID: 20124918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sagittal alignment after Bryan cervical arthroplasty.
Sasso RC; Metcalf NH; Hipp JA; Wharton ND; Anderson PA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):991-6. PubMed ID: 21358477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Segmental malalignment with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis--contributing factors.
Sears WR; Duggal N; Sekhon LH; Williamson OD
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Apr; 20(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 17414978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Segmental malalignment with the Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis--does it occur?
Sears WR; Sekhon LH; Duggal N; Williamson OD
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Feb; 20(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 17285044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.
Sasso RC; Best NM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of factors that may influence range of motion after cervical disc arthroplasty.
Kim SW; Paik SH; Castro PA; Baek SW; Shin DJ; Kwak YH; Ju YS
Spine J; 2010 Aug; 10(8):683-8. PubMed ID: 20537960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on maintaining sagittal alignment of the functional spinal unit and overall sagittal balance of the cervical spine.
Kim SW; Shin JH; Arbatin JJ; Park MS; Chung YK; McAfee PC
Eur Spine J; 2008 Jan; 17(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 17721713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Design limitations of Bryan disc arthroplasty.
Fong SY; DuPlessis SJ; Casha S; Hurlbert RJ
Spine J; 2006; 6(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 16651216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical and radiological results following cervical arthroplasty.
Yoon DH; Yi S; Shin HC; Kim KN; Kim SH
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2006 Sep; 148(9):943-50. PubMed ID: 16791434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of modified techniques in Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty.
Xu JX; Zhang YZ; Shen Y; Ding WY
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(10):1012-7. PubMed ID: 19404176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sagittal alignment comparison of Bryan disc arthroplasty with ProDisc-C arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial.
Yanbin Z; Yu S; Zhongqiang C; Zhongjun L
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Aug; 24(6):381-5. PubMed ID: 21150665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: Clinical article.
Burkus JK; Traynelis VC; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Oct; 21(4):516-28. PubMed ID: 25036218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term kinematic analysis of cervical spine after single-level implantation of Bryan cervical disc prosthesis.
Ryu WH; Kowalczyk I; Duggal N
Spine J; 2013 Jun; 13(6):628-34. PubMed ID: 23578991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on segmental and cervical spine alignment.
Pickett GE; Mitsis DK; Sekhon LH; Sears WR; Duggal N
Neurosurg Focus; 2004 Sep; 17(3):E5. PubMed ID: 15636561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Early clinical and radiologic outcomes of cervical arthroplasty with Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis.
Shim CS; Lee SH; Park HJ; Kang HS; Hwang JH
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Oct; 19(7):465-70. PubMed ID: 17021408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of coronal alignment of device on radiographic degeneration in the case of total disc replacement.
Kim SW; Paik SH; Oh JK; Kwak YH; Lee HW; You KH
Spine J; 2016 Apr; 16(4):470-9. PubMed ID: 26208879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preoperative T1 Slope as a Predictor of Change in Cervical Alignment and Range of Motion After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty.
Zhao J; Jiang R; Yang Y; Gu R; Gao Z; Xiao J; Chen S; Yang M
Med Sci Monit; 2017 Dec; 23():5844-5850. PubMed ID: 29222937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sagittal alignment after single cervical disc arthroplasty.
Guérin P; Obeid I; Gille O; Bourghli A; Luc S; Pointillart V; Vital JM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Feb; 25(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 22124426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.
Matgé G; Berthold C; Gunness VR; Hana A; Hertel F
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 25555050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intervertebral disc replacement for cervical degenerative disease--clinical results and functional outcome at two years in patients implanted with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis.
Heidecke V; Burkert W; Brucke M; Rainov NG
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2008 May; 150(5):453-9; discussion 459. PubMed ID: 18421412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]