297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20124919)
1. A computer-aided Cobb angle measurement method and its reliability.
Zhang J; Lou E; Shi X; Wang Y; Hill DL; Raso JV; Le LH; Lv L
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):383-7. PubMed ID: 20124919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer-aided assessment of scoliosis on posteroanterior radiographs.
Zhang J; Lou E; Hill DL; Raso JV; Wang Y; Le LH; Shi X
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2010 Feb; 48(2):185-95. PubMed ID: 20012376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of radiographic measures for infantile idiopathic scoliosis.
Corona J; Sanders JO; Luhmann SJ; Diab M; Vitale MG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 94(12):e86. PubMed ID: 22717838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability analysis of a smartphone-aided measurement method for the Cobb angle of scoliosis.
Qiao J; Liu Z; Xu L; Wu T; Zheng X; Zhu Z; Zhu F; Qian B; Qiu Y
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jun; 25(4):E88-92. PubMed ID: 22237178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of Cobb angle measurement: endplate versus pedicle as bony landmarks for measurement: a statistical analysis.
Mehta SS; Modi HN; Srinivasalu S; Chen T; Suh SW; Yang JH; Song HR
J Pediatr Orthop; 2009; 29(7):749-54. PubMed ID: 20104157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer-assisted algorithms improve reliability of King classification and Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis.
Stokes IA; Aronsson DD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Mar; 31(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 16540871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools.
Gstoettner M; Sekyra K; Walochnik N; Winter P; Wachter R; Bach CM
Eur Spine J; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1587-92. PubMed ID: 17549526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Variability in Cobb angle measurements using reformatted computerized tomography scans.
Adam CJ; Izatt MT; Harvey JR; Askin GN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1664-9. PubMed ID: 16025038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability of end, neutral, and stable vertebrae identification in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Potter BK; Rosner MK; Lehman RA; Polly DW; Schroeder TM; Kuklo TR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1658-63. PubMed ID: 16025037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer-assisted Cobb angle measurement on posteroanterior radiographs.
Zhang J; Lou E; Le LH; Hill D; Raso J; Wang Y
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 140():151-6. PubMed ID: 18810018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of the smartphone for end vertebra selection in scoliosis.
Pepe M; Kocadal O; Iyigun A; Gunes Z; Aksahin E; Aktekin CN
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2017 Mar; 51(2):146-149. PubMed ID: 28077254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability analysis of Cobb angle measurements of congenital scoliosis using X-ray and 3D-CT images.
Tauchi R; Tsuji T; Cahill PJ; Flynn JM; Flynn JM; Glotzbecker M; El-Hawary R; Heflin JA; Imagama S; Joshi AP; Nohara A; Ramirez N; Roye DP; Saito T; Sawyer JR; Smith JT; Kawakami N
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Jan; 26(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 26377663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability and reproducibility analysis of the Cobb angle and assessing sagittal plane by computer-assisted and manual measurement tools.
Wu W; Liang J; Du Y; Tan X; Xiang X; Wang W; Ru N; Le J
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Feb; 15():33. PubMed ID: 24502397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of observer variation in conventional and three digital radiographic methods used in the evaluation of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Mok JM; Berven SH; Diab M; Hackbarth M; Hu SS; Deviren V
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar; 33(6):681-6. PubMed ID: 18344863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability assessment of Cobb angle measurements using manual and digital methods.
Tanure MC; Pinheiro AP; Oliveira AS
Spine J; 2010 Sep; 10(9):769-74. PubMed ID: 20359959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interobserver variability using a commercially available system of archived digital radiography with integrated computer-assisted measurements for scoliosis Cobb angles.
Hardesty CK; Aronson J; Aronson EA; Ranade AS; McCracken CW; Nick TG; Cordell CL
J Pediatr Orthop; 2013 Mar; 33(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 23389571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automatic Cobb measurement of scoliosis based on fuzzy Hough Transform with vertebral shape prior.
Zhang J; Lou E; Le LH; Hill DL; Raso JV; Wang Y
J Digit Imaging; 2009 Oct; 22(5):463-72. PubMed ID: 18516643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of a computer-aided method for measuring the Cobb angle on chest X-rays.
Pan Y; Chen Q; Chen T; Wang H; Zhu X; Fang Z; Lu Y
Eur Spine J; 2019 Dec; 28(12):3035-3043. PubMed ID: 31446493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability analysis of Cobb measurement in degenerative lumbar scoliosis using endplate versus pedicle as bony landmarks.
Guo J; Deng XC; Ling QJ; Yin ZX; He EX
Postgrad Med; 2017 Sep; 129(7):762-767. PubMed ID: 28627954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of disc and vertebral wedging between patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and Chiari malformation-associated scoliosis.
Wang S; Qiu Y; Ma W; Wang B; Yu Y; Qian B; Zhu Z; Zhu F; Sun X
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jul; 25(5):277-84. PubMed ID: 21617568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
