These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20124919)
1. A computer-aided Cobb angle measurement method and its reliability. Zhang J; Lou E; Shi X; Wang Y; Hill DL; Raso JV; Le LH; Lv L J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):383-7. PubMed ID: 20124919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer-aided assessment of scoliosis on posteroanterior radiographs. Zhang J; Lou E; Hill DL; Raso JV; Wang Y; Le LH; Shi X Med Biol Eng Comput; 2010 Feb; 48(2):185-95. PubMed ID: 20012376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of radiographic measures for infantile idiopathic scoliosis. Corona J; Sanders JO; Luhmann SJ; Diab M; Vitale MG J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 94(12):e86. PubMed ID: 22717838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability analysis of a smartphone-aided measurement method for the Cobb angle of scoliosis. Qiao J; Liu Z; Xu L; Wu T; Zheng X; Zhu Z; Zhu F; Qian B; Qiu Y J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jun; 25(4):E88-92. PubMed ID: 22237178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of Cobb angle measurement: endplate versus pedicle as bony landmarks for measurement: a statistical analysis. Mehta SS; Modi HN; Srinivasalu S; Chen T; Suh SW; Yang JH; Song HR J Pediatr Orthop; 2009; 29(7):749-54. PubMed ID: 20104157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer-assisted algorithms improve reliability of King classification and Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis. Stokes IA; Aronsson DD Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Mar; 31(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 16540871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools. Gstoettner M; Sekyra K; Walochnik N; Winter P; Wachter R; Bach CM Eur Spine J; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1587-92. PubMed ID: 17549526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Variability in Cobb angle measurements using reformatted computerized tomography scans. Adam CJ; Izatt MT; Harvey JR; Askin GN Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1664-9. PubMed ID: 16025038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability of end, neutral, and stable vertebrae identification in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Potter BK; Rosner MK; Lehman RA; Polly DW; Schroeder TM; Kuklo TR Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1658-63. PubMed ID: 16025037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer-assisted Cobb angle measurement on posteroanterior radiographs. Zhang J; Lou E; Le LH; Hill D; Raso J; Wang Y Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 140():151-6. PubMed ID: 18810018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of the smartphone for end vertebra selection in scoliosis. Pepe M; Kocadal O; Iyigun A; Gunes Z; Aksahin E; Aktekin CN Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2017 Mar; 51(2):146-149. PubMed ID: 28077254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability analysis of Cobb angle measurements of congenital scoliosis using X-ray and 3D-CT images. Tauchi R; Tsuji T; Cahill PJ; Flynn JM; Flynn JM; Glotzbecker M; El-Hawary R; Heflin JA; Imagama S; Joshi AP; Nohara A; Ramirez N; Roye DP; Saito T; Sawyer JR; Smith JT; Kawakami N Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Jan; 26(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 26377663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability and reproducibility analysis of the Cobb angle and assessing sagittal plane by computer-assisted and manual measurement tools. Wu W; Liang J; Du Y; Tan X; Xiang X; Wang W; Ru N; Le J BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Feb; 15():33. PubMed ID: 24502397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of observer variation in conventional and three digital radiographic methods used in the evaluation of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Mok JM; Berven SH; Diab M; Hackbarth M; Hu SS; Deviren V Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar; 33(6):681-6. PubMed ID: 18344863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability assessment of Cobb angle measurements using manual and digital methods. Tanure MC; Pinheiro AP; Oliveira AS Spine J; 2010 Sep; 10(9):769-74. PubMed ID: 20359959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interobserver variability using a commercially available system of archived digital radiography with integrated computer-assisted measurements for scoliosis Cobb angles. Hardesty CK; Aronson J; Aronson EA; Ranade AS; McCracken CW; Nick TG; Cordell CL J Pediatr Orthop; 2013 Mar; 33(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 23389571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automatic Cobb measurement of scoliosis based on fuzzy Hough Transform with vertebral shape prior. Zhang J; Lou E; Le LH; Hill DL; Raso JV; Wang Y J Digit Imaging; 2009 Oct; 22(5):463-72. PubMed ID: 18516643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of a computer-aided method for measuring the Cobb angle on chest X-rays. Pan Y; Chen Q; Chen T; Wang H; Zhu X; Fang Z; Lu Y Eur Spine J; 2019 Dec; 28(12):3035-3043. PubMed ID: 31446493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability analysis of Cobb measurement in degenerative lumbar scoliosis using endplate versus pedicle as bony landmarks. Guo J; Deng XC; Ling QJ; Yin ZX; He EX Postgrad Med; 2017 Sep; 129(7):762-767. PubMed ID: 28627954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of disc and vertebral wedging between patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and Chiari malformation-associated scoliosis. Wang S; Qiu Y; Ma W; Wang B; Yu Y; Qian B; Zhu Z; Zhu F; Sun X J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jul; 25(5):277-84. PubMed ID: 21617568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]