These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20124919)

  • 21. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional measurement of the Cobb angle in scoliosis.
    Lechner R; Putzer D; Dammerer D; Liebensteiner M; Bach C; Thaler M
    Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):957-962. PubMed ID: 27921155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Further analysis of the reliability of the posterior tangent lateral lumbar radiographic mensuration procedure: concurrent validity of computer-aided X-ray digitization.
    Troyanovich SJ; Harrison DE; Harrison DD; Holland B; Janik TJ
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998 Sep; 21(7):460-7. PubMed ID: 9777546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the axial trunk rotation: manual versus smartphone-aided measurement tools.
    Qiao J; Xu L; Zhu Z; Zhu F; Liu Z; Qian B; Qiu Y
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Oct; 15():343. PubMed ID: 25305758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reliability of radiographic parameters in neuromuscular scoliosis.
    Gupta MC; Wijesekera S; Sossan A; Martin L; Vogel LC; Boakes JL; Lerman JA; McDonald CM; Betz RR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):691-5. PubMed ID: 17413476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reliability analysis for manual measurement of coronal plane deformity in adolescent scoliosis. Are 30 x 90 cm plain films better than digitized small films?
    De Carvalho A; Vialle R; Thomsen L; Amzallag J; Cluzel G; le Pointe HD; Mary P
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1615-20. PubMed ID: 17619912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of manual and digital measurements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Kuklo TR; Potter BK; Schroeder TM; O'Brien MF
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 May; 31(11):1240-6. PubMed ID: 16688038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the identification of the Lenke classification lumbar modifier in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Duong L; Cheriet F; Labelle H; Cheung KM; Abel MF; Newton PO; McCall RE; Lenke LG; Stokes IA
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Aug; 22(6):448-55. PubMed ID: 19652574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The assessment of intraobserver and interobserver error in the measurement of noncongenital scoliosis in children < or = 10 years of age.
    Loder RT; Spiegel D; Gutknecht S; Kleist K; Ly T; Mehbod A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Nov; 29(22):2548-53. PubMed ID: 15543072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Inter- and intraobserver variance of Cobb angle measurements with digital radiographs.
    Zmurko MG; Mooney JF; Podeszwa DA; Minster GJ; Mendelow MJ; Guirgues A
    J Surg Orthop Adv; 2003; 12(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 15008284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Centroid method: reliable method to determine the coronal curvature of scoliosis: a case control study comparing with the Cobb method.
    Hong JY; Suh SW; Modi HN; Hur CY; Song HR; Ryu JH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):E855-61. PubMed ID: 21289563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Computer-aided King classification of scoliosis.
    Zhang J; Li H; Lv L; Shi X; Zhang Y
    Technol Health Care; 2015; 23 Suppl 2():S411-7. PubMed ID: 26410507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The validity and reliability of "Spinal Mouse" assessment of spinal curvatures in the frontal plane in pediatric adolescent idiopathic thoraco-lumbar curves.
    Livanelioglu A; Kaya F; Nabiyev V; Demirkiran G; Fırat T
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Feb; 25(2):476-82. PubMed ID: 25900295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis radiographs with preselected end vertebrae: traditional versus digital acquisition.
    Wills BP; Auerbach JD; Zhu X; Caird MS; Horn BD; Flynn JM; Drummond DS; Dormans JP; Ecker ML
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 17202899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of reliability between the Lenke and King classification systems for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using radiographs that were not premeasured.
    Richards BS; Sucato DJ; Konigsberg DE; Ouellet JA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(11):1148-56; discussion 1156-7. PubMed ID: 12782983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Intra- and Interobserver Reliability of the Cobb Angle-Vertebral Rotation Angle-Spinous Process Angle for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.
    Chan AC; Morrison DG; Nguyen DV; Hill DL; Parent E; Lou EH
    Spine Deform; 2014 May; 2(3):168-175. PubMed ID: 27927414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Intra- and inter-observer reliability of Cobb angle measurements in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Prestigiacomo FG; Hulsbosch MHHM; Bruls VEJ; Nieuwenhuis JJ
    Spine Deform; 2022 Jan; 10(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 34383285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reliability analysis for manual adolescent idiopathic scoliosis measurements.
    Kuklo TR; Potter BK; Polly DW; O'Brien MF; Schroeder TM; Lenke LG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Feb; 30(4):444-54. PubMed ID: 15706343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Validity of Cobb angle measurements using digitally photographed radiographs.
    Ricart PA; Andres TM; Apazidis A; Errico TJ; Trobisch PD
    Spine J; 2011 Oct; 11(10):942-6. PubMed ID: 22005079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Correction of flexible thoracic scoliosis below 65 degrees--a radiological comparison of anterior versus posterior segmental instrumentation applied to similar curves.
    Kotwicki T; Dubousset J; Padovani JP
    Eur Spine J; 2006 Jun; 15(6):972-81. PubMed ID: 16586108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Analysis of accuracy of kyphotic angle measurement for vertebral osteoporotic compression fractures.
    Lee SW; Hong JT; Son BC; Sung JH; Kim IS; Park CK
    J Clin Neurosci; 2007 Oct; 14(10):961-5. PubMed ID: 17646103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.