297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20124919)
21. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional measurement of the Cobb angle in scoliosis.
Lechner R; Putzer D; Dammerer D; Liebensteiner M; Bach C; Thaler M
Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):957-962. PubMed ID: 27921155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Further analysis of the reliability of the posterior tangent lateral lumbar radiographic mensuration procedure: concurrent validity of computer-aided X-ray digitization.
Troyanovich SJ; Harrison DE; Harrison DD; Holland B; Janik TJ
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998 Sep; 21(7):460-7. PubMed ID: 9777546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the axial trunk rotation: manual versus smartphone-aided measurement tools.
Qiao J; Xu L; Zhu Z; Zhu F; Liu Z; Qian B; Qiu Y
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Oct; 15():343. PubMed ID: 25305758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Reliability of radiographic parameters in neuromuscular scoliosis.
Gupta MC; Wijesekera S; Sossan A; Martin L; Vogel LC; Boakes JL; Lerman JA; McDonald CM; Betz RR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):691-5. PubMed ID: 17413476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reliability analysis for manual measurement of coronal plane deformity in adolescent scoliosis. Are 30 x 90 cm plain films better than digitized small films?
De Carvalho A; Vialle R; Thomsen L; Amzallag J; Cluzel G; le Pointe HD; Mary P
Eur Spine J; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1615-20. PubMed ID: 17619912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of manual and digital measurements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Kuklo TR; Potter BK; Schroeder TM; O'Brien MF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 May; 31(11):1240-6. PubMed ID: 16688038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the identification of the Lenke classification lumbar modifier in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Duong L; Cheriet F; Labelle H; Cheung KM; Abel MF; Newton PO; McCall RE; Lenke LG; Stokes IA
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Aug; 22(6):448-55. PubMed ID: 19652574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The assessment of intraobserver and interobserver error in the measurement of noncongenital scoliosis in children < or = 10 years of age.
Loder RT; Spiegel D; Gutknecht S; Kleist K; Ly T; Mehbod A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Nov; 29(22):2548-53. PubMed ID: 15543072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Inter- and intraobserver variance of Cobb angle measurements with digital radiographs.
Zmurko MG; Mooney JF; Podeszwa DA; Minster GJ; Mendelow MJ; Guirgues A
J Surg Orthop Adv; 2003; 12(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 15008284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Centroid method: reliable method to determine the coronal curvature of scoliosis: a case control study comparing with the Cobb method.
Hong JY; Suh SW; Modi HN; Hur CY; Song HR; Ryu JH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):E855-61. PubMed ID: 21289563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Computer-aided King classification of scoliosis.
Zhang J; Li H; Lv L; Shi X; Zhang Y
Technol Health Care; 2015; 23 Suppl 2():S411-7. PubMed ID: 26410507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The validity and reliability of "Spinal Mouse" assessment of spinal curvatures in the frontal plane in pediatric adolescent idiopathic thoraco-lumbar curves.
Livanelioglu A; Kaya F; Nabiyev V; Demirkiran G; Fırat T
Eur Spine J; 2016 Feb; 25(2):476-82. PubMed ID: 25900295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis radiographs with preselected end vertebrae: traditional versus digital acquisition.
Wills BP; Auerbach JD; Zhu X; Caird MS; Horn BD; Flynn JM; Drummond DS; Dormans JP; Ecker ML
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 17202899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of reliability between the Lenke and King classification systems for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using radiographs that were not premeasured.
Richards BS; Sucato DJ; Konigsberg DE; Ouellet JA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(11):1148-56; discussion 1156-7. PubMed ID: 12782983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Intra- and Interobserver Reliability of the Cobb Angle-Vertebral Rotation Angle-Spinous Process Angle for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.
Chan AC; Morrison DG; Nguyen DV; Hill DL; Parent E; Lou EH
Spine Deform; 2014 May; 2(3):168-175. PubMed ID: 27927414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Intra- and inter-observer reliability of Cobb angle measurements in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Prestigiacomo FG; Hulsbosch MHHM; Bruls VEJ; Nieuwenhuis JJ
Spine Deform; 2022 Jan; 10(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 34383285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Reliability analysis for manual adolescent idiopathic scoliosis measurements.
Kuklo TR; Potter BK; Polly DW; O'Brien MF; Schroeder TM; Lenke LG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Feb; 30(4):444-54. PubMed ID: 15706343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Validity of Cobb angle measurements using digitally photographed radiographs.
Ricart PA; Andres TM; Apazidis A; Errico TJ; Trobisch PD
Spine J; 2011 Oct; 11(10):942-6. PubMed ID: 22005079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Correction of flexible thoracic scoliosis below 65 degrees--a radiological comparison of anterior versus posterior segmental instrumentation applied to similar curves.
Kotwicki T; Dubousset J; Padovani JP
Eur Spine J; 2006 Jun; 15(6):972-81. PubMed ID: 16586108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Analysis of accuracy of kyphotic angle measurement for vertebral osteoporotic compression fractures.
Lee SW; Hong JT; Son BC; Sung JH; Kim IS; Park CK
J Clin Neurosci; 2007 Oct; 14(10):961-5. PubMed ID: 17646103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
