116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20126521)
1. Quantitative Accuracy of Penalized-Likelihood Reconstruction for ROI Activity Estimation.
Fu L; Stickel JR; Badawi RD; Qi J
IEEE Trans Nucl Sci; 2009 Feb; 56(1):167. PubMed ID: 20126521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Theoretical study of penalized-likelihood image reconstruction for region of interest quantification.
Qi J; Huesman RH
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 May; 25(5):640-8. PubMed ID: 16689267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of penalized likelihood image reconstruction for dynamic PET quantification.
Wang G; Qi J
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Apr; 28(4):608-20. PubMed ID: 19211345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Design of iterative ROI transmission tomography reconstruction procedures and image quality analysis.
Hamelin B; Goussard Y; Dussault JP; Cloutier G; Beaudoin G; Soulez G
Med Phys; 2010 Sep; 37(9):4577-89. PubMed ID: 20964175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does the beta regularization parameter of bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction always affect the quantification accuracy and image quality of positron emission tomography computed tomography?
Wu Z; Guo B; Huang B; Zhao B; Qin Z; Hao X; Liang M; Xie J; Li S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 22(3):224-233. PubMed ID: 33683004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Noise-resolution tradeoffs in x-ray CT imaging: a comparison of penalized alternating minimization and filtered backprojection algorithms.
Evans JD; Politte DG; Whiting BR; O'Sullivan JA; Williamson JF
Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1444-58. PubMed ID: 21520856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting image properties in penalized-likelihood reconstructions of flat-panel CBCT.
Wang W; Gang GJ; Siewerdsen JH; Stayman JW
Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):65-80. PubMed ID: 30372536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Theoretical Analysis of Penalized Maximum-Likelihood Patlak Parametric Image Reconstruction in Dynamic PET for Lesion Detection.
Yang L; Wang G; Qi J
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2016 Apr; 35(4):947-56. PubMed ID: 26625407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A macroquantification approach for region-of-interest assessment in emission tomography.
Bouallègue FB
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(5):770-82. PubMed ID: 24045256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Regularized reconstruction in quantitative SPECT using CT side information from hybrid imaging.
Dewaraja YK; Koral KF; Fessler JA
Phys Med Biol; 2010 May; 55(9):2523-39. PubMed ID: 20393233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantification of FDG PET studies using standardised uptake values in multi-centre trials: effects of image reconstruction, resolution and ROI definition parameters.
Westerterp M; Pruim J; Oyen W; Hoekstra O; Paans A; Visser E; van Lanschot J; Sloof G; Boellaard R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2007 Mar; 34(3):392-404. PubMed ID: 17033848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the scanning linear estimator (SLE) and ROI methods for quantitative SPECT imaging.
Könik A; Kupinski M; Pretorius PH; King MA; Barrett HH
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Aug; 60(16):6479-94. PubMed ID: 26247228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Penalized maximum likelihood simultaneous longitudinal PET image reconstruction with difference-image priors.
Ellis S; Reader AJ
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3001-3018. PubMed ID: 29697144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Dirichlet process mixture model for automatic (18)F-FDG PET image segmentation: Validation study on phantoms and on lung and esophageal lesions.
Giri MG; Cavedon C; Mazzarotto R; Ferdeghini M
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2491. PubMed ID: 27147360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative and Qualitative Improvement of Low-Count [
Seo Y; Khalighi MM; Wangerin KA; Deller TW; Wang YH; Jivan S; Kohi MP; Aggarwal R; Flavell RR; Behr SC; Evans MJ
Mol Imaging Biol; 2020 Feb; 22(1):208-216. PubMed ID: 30993558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Image reconstruction for positron emission tomography based on patch-based regularization and dictionary learning.
Zhang W; Gao J; Yang Y; Liang D; Liu X; Zheng H; Hu Z
Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):5014-5026. PubMed ID: 31494950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study.
Boellaard R; Krak NC; Hoekstra OS; Lammertsma AA
J Nucl Med; 2004 Sep; 45(9):1519-27. PubMed ID: 15347719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Incident Photon Number and Reconstructed Linear Attenuation Coefficients in Iterative CT Image Reconstruction].
Shinohara H; Hashimoto T
Igaku Butsuri; 2019; 38(4):143-158. PubMed ID: 30828046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. (90)Y -PET imaging: Exploring limitations and accuracy under conditions of low counts and high random fraction.
Carlier T; Willowson KP; Fourkal E; Bailey DL; Doss M; Conti M
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4295-309. PubMed ID: 26133627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simultaneous deblurring and iterative reconstruction of CBCT for image guided brain radiosurgery.
Hashemi S; Song WY; Sahgal A; Lee Y; Huynh C; Grouza V; Nordström H; Eriksson M; Dorenlot A; Régis JM; Mainprize JG; Ruschin M
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Apr; 62(7):2521-2541. PubMed ID: 28248652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
