These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2012722)

  • 1. Multiple-beam equalization radiography in chest radiology. Image quality and radiation dose considerations.
    Axelsson B; Forsberg H; Hansson B; Haverling M
    Acta Radiol; 1991 Jan; 32(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 2012722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. AMBER and conventional chest radiography: comparison of radiation dose and image quality.
    Geleijns J; Broerse JJ; Julius HW; Vrooman HA; Zoetelief J; Zweers D; Kool LJ
    Radiology; 1992 Dec; 185(3):719-23. PubMed ID: 1438752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Filter wheel equalization in chest radiography: demonstration with a prototype system.
    Boone JM; Duryea J; Moore EH
    Radiology; 1995 Sep; 196(3):845-50. PubMed ID: 7644654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Advanced multiple-beam equalization radiography in chest radiology: a simulated nodule detection study.
    Kool LJ; Busscher DL; Vlasbloem H; Hermans J; vd Merwe PC; Algra PR; Herstel W
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 3420280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improved pulmonary nodule detection with scanning equalization radiography.
    Wandtke JC; Plewes DB; McFaul JA
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3420264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Area beam equalization: optimization and performance of an automated prototype system for chest radiography.
    Xu T; Shikhaliev PM; Berenji GR; Tehranzadeh J; Saremi F; Molloi S
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Apr; 11(4):377-89. PubMed ID: 15109010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A phantom for dose-image quality optimization in chest radiography.
    Vassileva J
    Br J Radiol; 2002 Oct; 75(898):837-42. PubMed ID: 12381693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. AMBER: a scanning multiple-beam equalization system for chest radiography.
    Vlasbloem H; Kool LJ
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 3420279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Film-based chest radiography: AMBER vs asymmetric screen-film systems.
    Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):743-7. PubMed ID: 8372749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variable compensation technique for digital radiography of the chest.
    Dobbins JT; Powell AO
    Radiology; 1989 Nov; 173(2):451-8. PubMed ID: 2798877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computed equalization radiography: preliminary clinical evaluation.
    Goodman LR; Wilson CR; Kim CS
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):399-404. PubMed ID: 8421742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
    Tingberg A; Sjöström D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The determination of the surface and organ doses in the AMBER system. Advanced Multiple Beam Equalization Radiography].
    Herzog R; von Boetticher H; Luska G
    Rofo; 1993 May; 158(5):483-6. PubMed ID: 8490159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scanning equalization radiography of the chest: assessment of image quality.
    Wandtke JC; Plewes DP; Vogelstein E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Nov; 145(5):973-8. PubMed ID: 2931967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dose-image quality study in digital chest radiography using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Correa SC; Souza EM; Silva AX; Lopes RT; Yoriyaz H
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Sep; 66(9):1213-7. PubMed ID: 18308576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. An ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Börjesson J; Mattsson S; Schlossman D
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 2591385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Advanced multiple beam equalization radiography (AMBER) combined with computed radiography. Preliminary evaluation.
    de Rooy TP; Oestmann JW; Schultze Kool LJ; Vrooman H; Buchmann F
    Acta Radiol; 1993 Sep; 34(5):445-9. PubMed ID: 8369179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computed radiography versus mobile direct radiography for bedside chest radiographs: impact of dose on image quality and reader agreement.
    De Boo DW; Weber M; Deurloo EE; Streekstra GJ; Freling NJ; Dongelmans DA; Schaefer-Prokop CM
    Clin Radiol; 2011 Sep; 66(9):826-32. PubMed ID: 21570679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.