These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20127306)

  • 1. The multiple faces of journal peer review.
    Thatje S
    Naturwissenschaften; 2010 Mar; 97(3):237-9. PubMed ID: 20127306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perfecting peer review?
    Nat Med; 2011 Jan; 17(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21217648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Citation marketing and networking.
    Couée I
    Naturwissenschaften; 2011 Aug; 98(8):717-8. PubMed ID: 21656200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhancements in peer review of manuscripts by the Journal.
    Liesegang TJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24929824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review: the cornerstone of scientific publishing integrity.
    Hillard T; Baber R
    Climacteric; 2021 Apr; 24(2):107-108. PubMed ID: 33645415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Publishing in learned journals.
    Arseculeratne SN
    Indian J Med Res; 2010 Nov; 132(5):525-6. PubMed ID: 21150003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Art of Peer Review.
    Fraser D
    Neonatal Netw; 2018 Jul; 37(4):195-196. PubMed ID: 30567915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is Peer Review Still Anonymous?
    Ritchie AI; Polkey MI; Donaldson GC; Wedzicha JA
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2018 Jul; 198(2):278-280. PubMed ID: 29537300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer Review of Scholarly Work.
    Brandon D; McGrath JM
    Adv Neonatal Care; 2018 Dec; 18(6):423-424. PubMed ID: 30499821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The peer review process: Giving and receiving advice.
    Jull G; Moore A
    Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2019 Apr; 40():v. PubMed ID: 30773425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. More than 1000 new manuscripts in 2017.
    Glimelius B
    Acta Oncol; 2018 Feb; 57(2):174-175. PubMed ID: 29303398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The discourteous reviewer.
    Leviton A
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 21(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 17239173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peer-Review Mentorship: What It Is and Why We Need It.
    Haase KR; Dzurec L
    ANS Adv Nurs Sci; 2019; 42(3):191-192. PubMed ID: 31356351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fixing peer review.
    Gyles C
    Can Vet J; 2014 Apr; 55(4):299-302. PubMed ID: 24688130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Veterinary pathology and peer review.
    Cantor GH; Caswell JL; Crissman JW; Gillette DM; Gunson DE; Hogenesch H; Kiupel M; Mense MG; Miller MA; Rush LJ; Leger JA; Schoeb TR; Sellers RS; Sills RC; Swayne DE; Thomas HC; Ward JM; Alden CL
    Vet Pathol; 2009 Mar; 46(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 19261628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Journal impact factors and research submission pressures.
    Makeham JM; Pilowsky PM
    ANZ J Surg; 2003 Mar; 73(3):93-4. PubMed ID: 12608963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When papers go bad--part 1, by Caveman.
    J Cell Sci; 2004 Dec; 117(Pt 25):5953-4. PubMed ID: 15678575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium.
    Eur Psychiatry; 2009 Mar; 24(2):69-70. PubMed ID: 19248983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Open access under scrutiny.
    Samkange-Zeeb F; Zeeb H
    J Radiol Prot; 2013 Dec; 33(4):885-6. PubMed ID: 24285443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.