These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20127328)

  • 1. Water challenges for geologic carbon capture and sequestration.
    Newmark RL; Friedmann SJ; Carroll SA
    Environ Manage; 2010 Apr; 45(4):651-61. PubMed ID: 20127328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Separation and capture of CO2 from large stationary sources and sequestration in geological formations--coalbeds and deep saline aquifers.
    White CM; Strazisar BR; Granite EJ; Hoffman JS; Pennline HW;
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2003 Jun; 53(6):645-715. PubMed ID: 12828330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Illustrative national scale scenarios of environmental and human health impacts of Carbon Capture and Storage.
    Tzanidakis K; Oxley T; Cockerill T; ApSimon H
    Environ Int; 2013 Jun; 56():48-64. PubMed ID: 23603732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Potential restrictions for CO2 sequestration sites due to shale and tight gas production.
    Elliot TR; Celia MA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Apr; 46(7):4223-7. PubMed ID: 22352312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The United States Department of Energy's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships Program Validation Phase.
    Litynski JT; Plasynski S; McIlvried HG; Mahoney C; Srivastava RD
    Environ Int; 2008 Jan; 34(1):127-38. PubMed ID: 17950875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Carbon dioxide capture and geological storage.
    Holloway S
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2007 Apr; 365(1853):1095-107. PubMed ID: 17272239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The United States Department of Energy's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships program: a collaborative approach to carbon management.
    Litynski JT; Klara SM; McIlvried HG; Srivastava RD
    Environ Int; 2006 Jan; 32(1):128-44. PubMed ID: 16054694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Making carbon sequestration a paying proposition.
    Han FX; Lindner JS; Wang C
    Naturwissenschaften; 2007 Mar; 94(3):170-82. PubMed ID: 17103136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comprehensive review of caprock-sealing mechanisms for geologic carbon sequestration.
    Song J; Zhang D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Jan; 47(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 23020638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impacts of urban forests on offsetting carbon emissions from industrial energy use in Hangzhou, China.
    Zhao M; Kong ZH; Escobedo FJ; Gao J
    J Environ Manage; 2010; 91(4):807-13. PubMed ID: 19914765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Climate policy to defeat the green paradox.
    Fölster S; Nyström J
    Ambio; 2010 May; 39(3):223-35. PubMed ID: 20701179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Greenhouse gas emission from reservoir and its influence factors].
    Zhao XJ; Zhao TQ; Zheng H; Duan XN; Chen FL; Ouyang ZY; Wang XK
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2008 Aug; 29(8):2377-84. PubMed ID: 18839604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. U-tube based near-surface environmental monitoring in the Shenhua carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) project.
    Li Q; Song R; Shi H; Ma J; Liu X; Li X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Apr; 25(12):12034-12052. PubMed ID: 29453717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Leakage of CO
    Gupta PK; Yadav B
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Apr; 27(12):12995-13018. PubMed ID: 32128734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Separation and capture of CO2 from large stationary sources and sequestration in geological formations.
    Chow JC; Watson JG; Herzog A; Benson SM; Hidy GM; Gunter WD; Penkala SJ; White CM
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2003 Oct; 53(10):1172-82. PubMed ID: 14604326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An integrated approach to determine sediment quality in areas above CO2 injection and storage in agreement with the requirements of the international conventions on the protection of the marine environment.
    Reguera DF; Riba I; Forja JM; DelValls TA
    Ecotoxicology; 2009 Nov; 18(8):1123-9. PubMed ID: 19597987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Framework for the assessment of interaction between CO2 geological storage and other sedimentary basin resources.
    Michael K; Whittaker S; Varma S; Bekele E; Langhi L; Hodgkinson J; Harris B
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2016 Feb; 18(2):164-75. PubMed ID: 26767550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Planning, designing, operating, and regulating a geologic sequestration repository as an underground landfill--a review.
    Brown CJ; Poiencot B; Sornberger C
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2011 Dec; 61(12):1306-18. PubMed ID: 22263419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using Prokaryotes for Carbon Capture Storage.
    Hicks N; Vik U; Taylor P; Ladoukakis E; Park J; Kolisis F; Jakobsen KS
    Trends Biotechnol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 27712920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Research for deployment: incorporating risk, regulation, and liability for carbon capture and sequestration.
    Wilson EJ; Friedmann SJ; Pollak MF
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Sep; 41(17):5945-52. PubMed ID: 17937265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.