176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20127342)
1. Is sphincter preservation reasonable in all patients with rectal cancer?
Fischer A; Tarantino I; Warschkow R; Lange J; Zerz A; Hetzer FH
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2010 Apr; 25(4):425-32. PubMed ID: 20127342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modified pull-through coloanal anastomosis to avoid permanent stomas and reduce postoperative complications for lower rectal tumors.
Mori S; Tanabe K; Wada M; Hamada Y; Yasudome R; Sonoda T; Matsushita D; Shimonosono M; Arigami T; Sasaki K; Kurahara H; Nakajo A; Ohtsuka T
Surg Endosc; 2023 Aug; 37(8):6569-6576. PubMed ID: 37311894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Low anterior resection combined with a covering stoma in the treatment of rectal cancer reduces the risk of permanent anastomotic failure.
Räsänen M; Renkonen-Sinisalo L; Carpelan-Holmström M; Lepistö A
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1323-8. PubMed ID: 26111635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anastomotic stricture after ultralow anterior resection or intersphincteric resection for very low-lying rectal cancer.
Lee SY; Kim CH; Kim YJ; Kim HR
Surg Endosc; 2018 Feb; 32(2):660-666. PubMed ID: 28726144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ultralow Anterior Resection and Coloanal Anastomosis for Low-Lying Rectal Cancer: An Appraisal Based on Bowel Function.
Cheong C; Oh SY; Choi SJ; Suh KW
Dig Surg; 2019; 36(5):409-417. PubMed ID: 29990965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cumulative Incidence and Risk Factors of Permanent Stoma After Intersphincteric Resection for Ultralow Rectal Cancer.
Zhang B; Zhuo GZ; Zhao K; Zhao Y; Gao DW; Zhu J; Ding JH
Dis Colon Rectum; 2022 Jan; 65(1):66-75. PubMed ID: 34882629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Delayed pull-through coloanal anastomosis without temporary stoma: an alternative to the standard manual side-to-end coloanal anastomosis with temporary stoma? A comparative study in 223 patients with low rectal cancer.
Melka D; Leiritz E; Labiad C; Blondeau M; Frontali A; Giacca M; Monsinjon M; Panis Y
Colorectal Dis; 2022 May; 24(5):587-593. PubMed ID: 35094470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Risk factors of coloanal anastomotic stricture after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer].
Zhang B; Zhuo GZ; Tian L; Zhao K; Zhao Y; Zhao YJ; Zhu J; Zhang T; Ding JH
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 22(8):755-761. PubMed ID: 31422614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A new sphincter-preserving operation for low rectal cancer: ultralow anterior resection and colorectal/coloanal anastomosis by supporting bundling-up method.
Han F; Li H; Zheng D; Gao H; Zhang Z
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2010 Jul; 25(7):873-80. PubMed ID: 20195620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The fate of preserved sphincter in rectal cancer patients.
Yoo RN; Kim G; Kye BH; Cho HM; Kim H
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Jun; 33(6):745-753. PubMed ID: 29532208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The risk of definitive stoma formation at 10 years after low and ultralow anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Celerier B; Denost Q; Van Geluwe B; Pontallier A; Rullier E
Colorectal Dis; 2016 Jan; 18(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 26391723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Two-stage Turnbull-Cutait pull-through coloanal anastomosis versus coloanal anastomosis with protective loop ileostomy for low rectal cancer. Protocol for a randomized controlled trial (Turnbull-BCN).
Biondo S; Trenti L; Galvez A; Espin-Basany E; Bianco F; Romano G; Kreisler E;
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Sep; 32(9):1357-1362. PubMed ID: 28667499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recurrence of rectal anastomotic leakage following stoma closure: assessment of risk factors.
Kitaguchi D; Nishizawa Y; Sasaki T; Tsukada Y; Ikeda K; Ito M
Colorectal Dis; 2019 Nov; 21(11):1304-1311. PubMed ID: 31199545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characteristics and risk factors associated with permanent stomas after sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer.
Seo SI; Yu CS; Kim GS; Lee JL; Yoon YS; Kim CW; Lim SB; Kim JC
World J Surg; 2013 Oct; 37(10):2490-6. PubMed ID: 23807125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sphincter-preserving operations without defunctioning stoma.
Lee SI; Sohn SK; Park YA
ANZ J Surg; 2007 May; 77(5):381-4. PubMed ID: 17497982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intersphincteric resection with direct coloanal anastomosis for ultralow rectal cancer: the experience of People's Republic of China.
Han JG; Wei GH; Gao ZG; Zheng Y; Wang ZJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2009 May; 52(5):950-7. PubMed ID: 19502861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Treatment of complications after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer].
Zhang B; Zhao K; Liu Q; Yin S; Zhao Y; Zhuo G; Feng Y; Zhu J; Ding J
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 20(4):432-438. PubMed ID: 28440525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness comparison of delayed versus immediate coloanal anastomosis following ultralow anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Shannon NB; Seow-En I; Tan EK
ANZ J Surg; 2023 Apr; 93(4):963-969. PubMed ID: 36358002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Persistent Asymptomatic Anastomotic Leakage After Laparoscopic Sphincter-Saving Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Can Diverting Stoma Be Reversed Safely at 6 Months?
Hain E; Maggiori L; Manceau G; Zappa M; Prost à la Denise J; Panis Y
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 May; 59(5):369-76. PubMed ID: 27050598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of faecal diversion in low rectal cancer: a review of 1791 patients having rectal resection with anastomosis for cancer, with and without a proximal stoma.
Nurkin S; Kakarla VR; Ruiz DE; Cance WG; Tiszenkel HI
Colorectal Dis; 2013 Jun; 15(6):e309-16. PubMed ID: 23586660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
