These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20127829)
1. Static single channel and multichannel water perfusion pressure profilometry in a bench model of a urethra. Hirst GR; Beeton RJ; Lucas MG Neurourol Urodyn; 2010 Sep; 29(7):1312-9. PubMed ID: 20127829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A biophysical model of the male urethra: comparing viscoelastic properties of polyvinyl alcohol urethras to male pig urethras. Idzenga T; Pel JJ; van Mastrigt R Neurourol Urodyn; 2006; 25(5):451-60. PubMed ID: 16807917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Technical features of the system used to perform multichannel urethral pressure profilometry. Messelink EJ; Dobbe I; Kools C; Dabhoiwala NF; Dijkhuizen T; Schneider P; Lettinga KP; Kurth K Tech Urol; 1997; 3(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 9422448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Urethral pressure profilometry with membrane catheter compared with perfusion catheter systems. Schmidt RA; Witherow R; van Gool JD; Tanagho EA Urol Int; 1978; 33(5):345-54. PubMed ID: 705985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Reliability of pressure measures determined with probes used for establishing the urethral pressure profile by the perfusion method]. Le Normand L; Glemain P; Cordonnier JP; Wetzel O; Bochereau G; Buzelin JM Prog Urol; 1995 Dec; 5(6):980-4. PubMed ID: 8777408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simultaneous diuresis cysto-urethrometry and multichannel urethral pressure profilometry in continent female dogs. Nickel RF; van den Brom WE Am J Vet Res; 1996 Aug; 57(8):1131-6. PubMed ID: 8836362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative study of water perfusion catheters and microtip transducer catheters for urethral pressure measurements. Kuhn A; Nager CW; Hawkins E; Schulz J; Stanton SL Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2007 Aug; 18(8):931-5. PubMed ID: 17131168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the cough stress test and single-channel cystometry with multichannel urodynamic evaluation in genuine stress incontinence. Scotti RJ; Myers DL Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Mar; 81(3):430-3. PubMed ID: 8437800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of two catheter withdrawal speeds during simultaneous urethral pressure profilometry in anesthetized bitches. Gregory SP; Holt PE; Parkinson TJ Am J Vet Res; 1992 Mar; 53(3):355-8. PubMed ID: 1595960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Possibilities of experimental verification of the validity of urethral pressure profilometry. Zatura F; Rosenberg J Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2006 Nov; 150(2):345-51. PubMed ID: 17426804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Three dimensional urethral pressure profile. II. Basic consideration of the catheter with only one eye and comparison with the catheter with the tip transducer by Millar]. Morita T; Nishimoto T; Noto H Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 1983 Oct; 74(10):1772-7. PubMed ID: 6676557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Reexamination of the intraurethral pressure determination using CO2 perfusion: its monitoring mechanism, standardization, and employment for the determination of the urethral constitutive property. Ghista DN; Perkash I Prog Clin Biol Res; 1981; 78():243-51. PubMed ID: 6801704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimization of the artificial urinary sphincter: modelling and experimental validation. Marti F; Leippold T; John H; Blunschi N; Müller B Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(5):1361-75. PubMed ID: 16481700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Recording urethral pressure profile: comparison of methods and clinical implications. Schmidt RR; Witherow R; Tanagho EA Urology; 1977 Oct; 10(4):390-7. PubMed ID: 919127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Resting and stress urethral pressures as a clinical guide to the mechanism of continence in the female patient. Constantinou CE Urol Clin North Am; 1985 May; 12(2):247-58. PubMed ID: 4039486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Membrane and microtransducer catheters: their effectiveness for profilometry of the lower urinary tract. Tanagho EA Urol Clin North Am; 1979 Feb; 6(1):110-9. PubMed ID: 571157 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Urethral pressure reflectometry vs urethral pressure profilometry in women: a comparative study of reproducibility and accuracy. Klarskov N; Lose G BJU Int; 2007 Aug; 100(2):351-6. PubMed ID: 17501964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Catheter measurements of the urethral pressure]. Bykova AA; Regirer SA Biofizika; 2004; 49(6):1134-8. PubMed ID: 15612559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]