These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20127829)

  • 1. Static single channel and multichannel water perfusion pressure profilometry in a bench model of a urethra.
    Hirst GR; Beeton RJ; Lucas MG
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2010 Sep; 29(7):1312-9. PubMed ID: 20127829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A biophysical model of the male urethra: comparing viscoelastic properties of polyvinyl alcohol urethras to male pig urethras.
    Idzenga T; Pel JJ; van Mastrigt R
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2006; 25(5):451-60. PubMed ID: 16807917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Technical features of the system used to perform multichannel urethral pressure profilometry.
    Messelink EJ; Dobbe I; Kools C; Dabhoiwala NF; Dijkhuizen T; Schneider P; Lettinga KP; Kurth K
    Tech Urol; 1997; 3(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 9422448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Urethral pressure profilometry with membrane catheter compared with perfusion catheter systems.
    Schmidt RA; Witherow R; van Gool JD; Tanagho EA
    Urol Int; 1978; 33(5):345-54. PubMed ID: 705985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Reliability of pressure measures determined with probes used for establishing the urethral pressure profile by the perfusion method].
    Le Normand L; Glemain P; Cordonnier JP; Wetzel O; Bochereau G; Buzelin JM
    Prog Urol; 1995 Dec; 5(6):980-4. PubMed ID: 8777408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simultaneous diuresis cysto-urethrometry and multichannel urethral pressure profilometry in continent female dogs.
    Nickel RF; van den Brom WE
    Am J Vet Res; 1996 Aug; 57(8):1131-6. PubMed ID: 8836362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative study of water perfusion catheters and microtip transducer catheters for urethral pressure measurements.
    Kuhn A; Nager CW; Hawkins E; Schulz J; Stanton SL
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2007 Aug; 18(8):931-5. PubMed ID: 17131168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perfusion urethral profilometry.
    Abrams PH
    Urol Clin North Am; 1979 Feb; 6(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 86222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the cough stress test and single-channel cystometry with multichannel urodynamic evaluation in genuine stress incontinence.
    Scotti RJ; Myers DL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Mar; 81(3):430-3. PubMed ID: 8437800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of alpha 1-adrenoceptor agonists in canine urethral pressure profilometry and abdominal leak point pressure models.
    Brune ME; O'Neill AB; Gauvin DM; Katwala SP; Altenbach RJ; Brioni JD; Hancock AA; Sullivan JP
    J Urol; 2001 Oct; 166(4):1555-9. PubMed ID: 11547130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of two catheter withdrawal speeds during simultaneous urethral pressure profilometry in anesthetized bitches.
    Gregory SP; Holt PE; Parkinson TJ
    Am J Vet Res; 1992 Mar; 53(3):355-8. PubMed ID: 1595960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Possibilities of experimental verification of the validity of urethral pressure profilometry.
    Zatura F; Rosenberg J
    Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2006 Nov; 150(2):345-51. PubMed ID: 17426804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Three dimensional urethral pressure profile. II. Basic consideration of the catheter with only one eye and comparison with the catheter with the tip transducer by Millar].
    Morita T; Nishimoto T; Noto H
    Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 1983 Oct; 74(10):1772-7. PubMed ID: 6676557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reexamination of the intraurethral pressure determination using CO2 perfusion: its monitoring mechanism, standardization, and employment for the determination of the urethral constitutive property.
    Ghista DN; Perkash I
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1981; 78():243-51. PubMed ID: 6801704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimization of the artificial urinary sphincter: modelling and experimental validation.
    Marti F; Leippold T; John H; Blunschi N; Müller B
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(5):1361-75. PubMed ID: 16481700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recording urethral pressure profile: comparison of methods and clinical implications.
    Schmidt RR; Witherow R; Tanagho EA
    Urology; 1977 Oct; 10(4):390-7. PubMed ID: 919127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Resting and stress urethral pressures as a clinical guide to the mechanism of continence in the female patient.
    Constantinou CE
    Urol Clin North Am; 1985 May; 12(2):247-58. PubMed ID: 4039486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Membrane and microtransducer catheters: their effectiveness for profilometry of the lower urinary tract.
    Tanagho EA
    Urol Clin North Am; 1979 Feb; 6(1):110-9. PubMed ID: 571157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Urethral pressure reflectometry vs urethral pressure profilometry in women: a comparative study of reproducibility and accuracy.
    Klarskov N; Lose G
    BJU Int; 2007 Aug; 100(2):351-6. PubMed ID: 17501964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Catheter measurements of the urethral pressure].
    Bykova AA; Regirer SA
    Biofizika; 2004; 49(6):1134-8. PubMed ID: 15612559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.