These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20128781)

  • 1. Prognostic significance of a positive surgical margin in pathologically organ-confined prostate cancer.
    Ahyai SA; Zacharias M; Isbarn H; Steuber T; Eichelberg C; Köllermann J; Fisch M; Karakiewicz PI; Huland H; Graefen M; Chun FK
    BJU Int; 2010 Aug; 106(4):478-83. PubMed ID: 20128781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tumour volume is an independent predictor of prostate-specific antigen recurrence in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Nelson BA; Shappell SB; Chang SS; Wells N; Farnham SB; Smith JA; Cookson MS
    BJU Int; 2006 Jun; 97(6):1169-72. PubMed ID: 16686706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression?
    Pfitzenmaier J; Pahernik S; Tremmel T; Haferkamp A; Buse S; Hohenfellner M
    BJU Int; 2008 Nov; 102(10):1413-8. PubMed ID: 18537951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Site of positive surgical margins influences biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Godoy G; Tareen BU; Lepor H
    BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1610-4. PubMed ID: 19549257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Percentage of high-grade tumour volume does not meaningfully improve prediction of early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy compared with Gleason score.
    Hansen J; Bianchi M; Sun M; Rink M; Castiglione F; Abdollah F; Steuber T; Ahyai SA; Steurer S; Göbel C; Freschi M; Montorsi F; Shariat SF; Fisch M; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI; Briganti A; Chun FK
    BJU Int; 2014 Mar; 113(3):399-407. PubMed ID: 24053339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pathological findings and prostate-specific antigen outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.
    Ploussard G; Salomon L; Allory Y; Terry S; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; Vacherot F; de la Taille A
    BJU Int; 2010 Jul; 106(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 19930177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biochemical recurrence rate in patients with positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy with further negative resected tissue.
    Rabbani F; Vora KC; Yunis LH; Eastham JA; Guillonneau B; Scardino PT; Touijer K
    BJU Int; 2009 Sep; 104(5):605-10. PubMed ID: 19689577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tumour volume and high grade tumour volume are the best predictors of pathologic stage and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Chun FK; Briganti A; Jeldres C; Gallina A; Erbersdobler A; Schlomm T; Walz J; Eichelberg C; Salomon G; Haese A; Currlin E; Ahyai SA; Bénard F; Huland H; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
    Eur J Cancer; 2007 Feb; 43(3):536-43. PubMed ID: 17222546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Shikanov S; Marchetti P; Desai V; Razmaria A; Antic T; Al-Ahmadie H; Zagaja G; Eggener S; Brendler C; Shalhav A
    BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 22759270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The prognostic role of the pathological T2 subclassification for prostate cancer in the 2002 Tumour-Nodes-Metastasis staging system.
    van Oort IM; Witjes JA; Kok DE; Kiemeney LA; Hulsbergen-Van De Kaa CA
    BJU Int; 2008 Aug; 102(4):438-41. PubMed ID: 18336608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term data on the survival of patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy in the prostate-specific antigen era.
    Isbarn H; Wanner M; Salomon G; Steuber T; Schlomm T; Köllermann J; Sauter G; Haese A; Heinzer H; Huland H; Graefen M
    BJU Int; 2010 Jul; 106(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 20002667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Defining pathological variables to predict biochemical failure in patients with positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy: implications for adjuvant radiotherapy.
    Resnick MJ; Canter DJ; Guzzo TJ; Magerfleisch L; Tomaszewski JE; Brucker BM; Bergey MR; Sonnad SS; Wein AJ; Malkowicz SB
    BJU Int; 2010 May; 105(10):1377-80. PubMed ID: 19888981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Race and prostate weight as independent predictors for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Schroeck FR; Sun L; Freedland SJ; Jayachandran J; Robertson CN; Moul JW
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2008; 11(4):371-6. PubMed ID: 18427570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens an independent prognostic marker?
    Saether T; Sørlien LT; Viset T; Lydersen S; Angelsen A
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2008; 42(6):514-21. PubMed ID: 18752153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identification of factors predicting response to adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with positive margins after radical prostatectomy.
    Kamat AM; Babaian K; Cheung MR; Naya Y; Huang SH; Kuban D; Babaian RJ
    J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1860-3. PubMed ID: 14532793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
    Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
    BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tumor volume does not predict for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with surgical Gleason score 6 or less prostate cancer.
    Merrill MM; Lane BR; Reuther AM; Zhou M; Magi-Galluzzi C; Klein EA
    Urology; 2007 Aug; 70(2):294-8. PubMed ID: 17826492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
    Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oncological control after radical prostatectomy in men with clinical T3 prostate cancer: a single-centre experience.
    Xylinas E; Drouin SJ; Comperat E; Vaessen C; Renard-Penna R; Misrai V; Bitker MO; Chartier-Kastler E; Richard F; Cussenot O; Roupret M
    BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1173-8; discussion 1178. PubMed ID: 19040530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.