915 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20128830)
21. Effect of chemically modified titanium surfaces on protein adsorption and osteoblast precursor cell behavior.
Protivínský J; Appleford M; Strnad J; Helebrant A; Ong JL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):542-50. PubMed ID: 17929514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Fluoride modification effects on osteoblast behavior and bone formation at TiO2 grit-blasted c.p. titanium endosseous implants.
Cooper LF; Zhou Y; Takebe J; Guo J; Abron A; Holmén A; Ellingsen JE
Biomaterials; 2006 Feb; 27(6):926-36. PubMed ID: 16112191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Osteoblastic cell behaviour on different titanium implant surfaces.
Le Guehennec L; Lopez-Heredia MA; Enkel B; Weiss P; Amouriq Y; Layrolle P
Acta Biomater; 2008 May; 4(3):535-43. PubMed ID: 18226985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Biomineralized strontium-substituted apatite/titanium dioxide coating on titanium surfaces.
Xia W; Lindahl C; Lausmaa J; Borchardt P; Ballo A; Thomsen P; Engqvist H
Acta Biomater; 2010 Apr; 6(4):1591-600. PubMed ID: 19861177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Ultraviolet light treatment for the restoration of age-related degradation of titanium bioactivity.
Hori N; Ueno T; Suzuki T; Yamada M; Att W; Okada S; Ohno A; Aita H; Kimoto K; Ogawa T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):49-62. PubMed ID: 20209187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Surface engineering of titanium thin films with silk fibroin via layer-by-layer technique and its effects on osteoblast growth behavior.
Cai K; Hu Y; Jandt KD
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 Sep; 82(4):927-35. PubMed ID: 17335030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Differences in the bone differentiation properties of MC3T3-E1 cells on polished bulk and sputter-deposited titanium specimens.
Oya K; Tanaka Y; Moriyama Y; Yoshioka Y; Kimura T; Tsutsumi Y; Doi H; Nomura N; Noda K; Kishida A; Hanawa T
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Aug; 94(2):611-8. PubMed ID: 20198694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Osteoconductivity of hydrophilic microstructured titanium implants with phosphate ion chemistry.
Park JW; Jang JH; Lee CS; Hanawa T
Acta Biomater; 2009 Jul; 5(6):2311-21. PubMed ID: 19332400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Positive modulation of osteogenesis- and osteoclastogenesis-related gene expression with strontium-containing microstructured Ti implants in rabbit cancellous bone.
Park JW; Kim YJ; Jang JH; Song H
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2013 Jan; 101(1):298-306. PubMed ID: 23065737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. In vitro osteoblast response to anodized titanium and anodized titanium followed by hydrothermal treatment.
Rodriguez R; Kim K; Ong JL
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2003 Jun; 65(3):352-8. PubMed ID: 12746882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Osteoblast-like cell attachment and proliferation on turned, blasted, and anodized titanium surfaces.
Pae A; Kim SS; Kim HS; Woo YH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):475-81. PubMed ID: 21691593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The combination of micron and nanotopography by H(2)SO(4)/H(2)O(2) treatment and its effects on osteoblast-specific gene expression of hMSCs.
Mendonça G; Mendonça DB; Aragão FJ; Cooper LF
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Jul; 94(1):169-79. PubMed ID: 20128007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. An in vitro comparison of possibly bioactive titanium implant surfaces.
Göransson A; Arvidsson A; Currie F; Franke-Stenport V; Kjellin P; Mustafa K; Sul YT; Wennerberg A
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Mar; 88(4):1037-47. PubMed ID: 18404711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effect of different titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implant surfaces on phenotypic expression of human bone-derived cells.
Knabe C; Howlett CR; Klar F; Zreiqat H
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Oct; 71(1):98-107. PubMed ID: 15368259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of SLA titanium surfaces with further alkali or hydrogen peroxide and heat treatment.
Zhang EW; Wang YB; Shuai KG; Gao F; Bai YJ; Cheng Y; Xiong XL; Zheng YF; Wei SC
Biomed Mater; 2011 Apr; 6(2):025001. PubMed ID: 21293055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of surface treatment on cell responses to grades 4 and 5 titanium for orthodontic mini-implants.
Galli C; Piemontese M; Ravanetti F; Lumetti S; Passeri G; Gandolfini M; Macaluso GM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jun; 141(6):705-14. PubMed ID: 22640672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Histone deacetylase inhibitors promote osteoblast maturation.
Schroeder TM; Westendorf JJ
J Bone Miner Res; 2005 Dec; 20(12):2254-63. PubMed ID: 16294278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Multifunctional Ti-(Ca,Zr)-(C,N,O,P) films for load-bearing implants.
Shtansky DV; Gloushankova NA; Bashkova IA; Kharitonova MA; Moizhess TG; Sheveiko AN; Kiryukhantsev-Korneev FV; Petrzhik MI; Levashov EA
Biomaterials; 2006 Jul; 27(19):3519-31. PubMed ID: 16530825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The cytocompatibility and osseointegration of the Ti implants with XPEED® surfaces.
Lee SY; Yang DJ; Yeo S; An HW; Ryoo KH; Park KB
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1283-9. PubMed ID: 22093072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of biomimetic deposition on anodized titanium surfaces.
Kim MH; Lee SY; Kim MJ; Kim SK; Heo SJ; Koak JY
J Dent Res; 2011 Jun; 90(6):711-6. PubMed ID: 21393553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
