These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2012901)

  • 21. Auditory-visual speech perception and auditory-visual enhancement in normal-hearing younger and older adults.
    Sommers MS; Tye-Murray N; Spehar B
    Ear Hear; 2005 Jun; 26(3):263-75. PubMed ID: 15937408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of simulated visual impairment on speech-reading ability.
    Dickinson CM; Taylor J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2011 May; 31(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 21410739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.
    Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 23095723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Discriminating languages by speech-reading.
    Soto-Faraco S; Navarra J; Weikum WM; Vouloumanos A; Sebastián-Gallés N; Werker JF
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Feb; 69(2):218-31. PubMed ID: 17557592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Audio-visual speech in noise perception in dyslexia.
    van Laarhoven T; Keetels M; Schakel L; Vroomen J
    Dev Sci; 2018 Jan; 21(1):. PubMed ID: 27990724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impaired speech perception in poor readers: evidence from hearing and speech reading.
    de Gelder B; Vroomen J
    Brain Lang; 1998 Oct; 64(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 9743542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A new protocol for assessing viseme perception in sentence context: the lipreading discrimination test.
    Bement L; Wallber J; DeFilippo C; Bochner J; Garrison W
    Ear Hear; 1988 Feb; 9(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 3342942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. More challenging speech-perception tasks demonstrate binaural benefit in bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Wackym PA; Runge-Samuelson CL; Firszt JB; Alkaf FM; Burg LS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):80S-85S. PubMed ID: 17496654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Visual speech alters the discrimination and identification of non-intact auditory speech in children with hearing loss.
    Jerger S; Damian MF; McAlpine RP; Abdi H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Mar; 94():127-137. PubMed ID: 28167003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical trials with a 22-channel cochlear prosthesis.
    Cohen NL; Waltzman SB; Shapiro WH
    Laryngoscope; 1985 Dec; 95(12):1448-54. PubMed ID: 3906323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Audiovisual asynchrony detection and speech intelligibility in noise with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing impairment.
    Başkent D; Bazo D
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 21389856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Visual speechreading and cognitive performance in hearing-impaired and normal hearing children (11-14 years).
    Lyxell B; Holmberg I
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2000 Dec; 70 Pt 4():505-18. PubMed ID: 11191184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The use of visible speech cues for improving auditory detection of spoken sentences.
    Grant KW; Seitz PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):1197-208. PubMed ID: 11008820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Age-related changes on a children's test of sensory-level speech perception capacity.
    Hnath-Chisolm TE; Laipply E; Boothroyd A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1998 Feb; 41(1):94-106. PubMed ID: 9493737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Improvement in speech-reading ability by auditory training: Evidence from gender differences in normally hearing, deaf and cochlear implanted subjects.
    Strelnikov K; Rouger J; Lagleyre S; Fraysse B; Deguine O; Barone P
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Mar; 47(4):972-9. PubMed ID: 19022268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing speech in noise.
    Anderson Gosselin P; Gagné JP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):944-58. PubMed ID: 21060138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Speech-reading: cognitive predictors and displayed emotion.
    Lidestam B; Lyxell B; Andersson G
    Scand Audiol; 1999; 28(4):211-7. PubMed ID: 10572966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Audiological correlates of speech understanding deficits in elderly listeners with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. III. Factor representation.
    Divenyi PL; Haupt KM
    Ear Hear; 1997 Jun; 18(3):189-201. PubMed ID: 9201454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.