These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20129467)

  • 1. Authentication of forensic DNA samples.
    Frumkin D; Wasserstrom A; Davidson A; Grafit A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2010 Feb; 4(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 20129467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Logical Framework of Forensic Identification: Ability to Resist Fabricated DNA.
    Wang Z; Zhou D; Zhang S; Bian Y; Hu Z; Zhu R; Lu D; Li C
    Mol Biotechnol; 2015 Dec; 57(11-12):1030-7. PubMed ID: 26392194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. TWGDAM validation of the AmpFISTR blue PCR amplification kit for forensic casework analysis.
    Wallin JM; Buoncristiani MR; Lazaruk KD; Fildes N; Holt CL; Walsh PS
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Jul; 43(4):854-70. PubMed ID: 9670511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Real-time forensic DNA analysis at a crime scene using a portable microchip analyzer.
    Liu P; Yeung SH; Crenshaw KA; Crouse CA; Scherer JR; Mathies RA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Sep; 2(4):301-9. PubMed ID: 19083840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The validation of forensic DNA extraction systems to utilize soil contaminated biological evidence.
    Kasu M; Shires K
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2015 Jul; 17(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 25690910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Extraction of human DNA for PCR from chewed residues of betel quid using a novel "PVP/CTAB" method.
    Chiou FS; Pai CY; Hsu YP; Tsai CW; Yang CH
    J Forensic Sci; 2001 Sep; 46(5):1174-9. PubMed ID: 11569562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Powerplex® ES versus Powerplex® S5--casework testing of the new screening kit.
    Poetsch M; Kamphausen T; Bajanowski T; Schwark T; von Wurmb-Schwark N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Jan; 5(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 20457034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of STR typing by capillary electrophoresis.
    Moretti TR; Baumstark AL; Defenbaugh DA; Keys KM; Brown AL; Budowle B
    J Forensic Sci; 2001 May; 46(3):661-76. PubMed ID: 11373005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A quadruplex real-time qPCR assay for the simultaneous assessment of total human DNA, human male DNA, DNA degradation and the presence of PCR inhibitors in forensic samples: a diagnostic tool for STR typing.
    Hudlow WR; Chong MD; Swango KL; Timken MD; Buoncristiani MR
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Mar; 2(2):108-25. PubMed ID: 19083806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of two whole genome amplification methods for STR genotyping of LCN and degraded DNA samples.
    Ballantyne KN; van Oorschot RA; Mitchell RJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Feb; 166(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 16687226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. HLA DQA1 and Polymarker validations for forensic casework: standard specimens, reproducibility, and mixed specimens.
    Gross AM; Guerrieri RA
    J Forensic Sci; 1996 Nov; 41(6):1022-6. PubMed ID: 8914290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Demonstration of rapid multiplex PCR amplification involving 16 genetic loci.
    Vallone PM; Hill CR; Butler JM
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Dec; 3(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 19083866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of short tandem repeats (STRs) for forensic usage: performance testing of fluorescent multiplex STR systems and analysis of authentic and simulated forensic samples.
    Moretti TR; Baumstark AL; Defenbaugh DA; Keys KM; Smerick JB; Budowle B
    J Forensic Sci; 2001 May; 46(3):647-60. PubMed ID: 11373004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of the AmpliFLP D1S80 PCR Amplification Kit for forensic casework analysis according to TWGDAM guidelines.
    Cosso S; Reynolds R
    J Forensic Sci; 1995 May; 40(3):424-34. PubMed ID: 7782746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Low template DNA profiling and its application in forensic science].
    Ma Y; Kuang JZ; Hou YP
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Apr; 26(2):132-6. PubMed ID: 20653141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Personal identification using DNA polymorphism--the identification of forensic biological materials].
    Shiono H
    Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi; 1996 Oct; 50(5):320-30. PubMed ID: 8952331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated forensic DNA purification optimized for FTA card punches and identifiler STR-based PCR analysis.
    Tack LC; Thomas M; Reich K
    Clin Lab Med; 2007 Mar; 27(1):183-91. PubMed ID: 17416311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concordance study between the AmpFlSTR MiniFiler PCR amplification kit and conventional STR typing kits.
    Hill CR; Kline MC; Mulero JJ; Lagacé RE; Chang CW; Hennessy LK; Butler JM
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jul; 52(4):870-3. PubMed ID: 17553078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. TWGDAM validation of AmpFlSTR PCR amplification kits for forensic DNA casework.
    Holt CL; Buoncristiani M; Wallin JM; Nguyen T; Lazaruk KD; Walsh PS
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Jan; 47(1):66-96. PubMed ID: 12064672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. AmpFlSTR profiler Plus short tandem repeat DNA analysis of casework samples, mixture samples, and nonhuman DNA samples amplified under reduced PCR volume conditions (25 microL).
    Frégeau CJ; Bowen KL; Leclair B; Trudel I; Bishop L; Fourney RM
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Sep; 48(5):1014-34. PubMed ID: 14535664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.