218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20129757)
1. Intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy: a simple method to prevent medial trapping of the proximal fragment.
Blinder D; Peleg O; Yoffe T; Taicher S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 39(3):289-91. PubMed ID: 20129757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interferences between mandibular proximal and distal segments in orthognathic surgery for patients with asymmetric mandibular prognathism depending on different osteotomy techniques.
Yang HJ; Lee WJ; Yi WJ; Hwang SJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 20382051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of the Sonopet ultrasonic curettage device in intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy.
Ueki K; Nakagawa K; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Yamamoto E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Aug; 36(8):745-7. PubMed ID: 17391925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Severe Class II malocclusion with facial asymmetry treated with intraoral vertico-sagittal ramus osteotomy and LeFort I osteotomy.
Kuroda S; Murakami K; Morishige Y; Takano-Yamamoto T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):809-19. PubMed ID: 19524842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changes in occlusal force after mandibular ramus osteotomy with and without Le Fort I osteotomy.
Ueki K; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Apr; 36(4):301-4. PubMed ID: 17239561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Skeletal changes after modified intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism.
Lai SS; Tseng YC; Huang IY; Yang YH; Shen YS; Chen CM
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 17223511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Correction of mandibular prognathism by intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy and improvement of the technic].
Wang X
Zhonghua Zheng Xing Shao Shang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1989 Jun; 5(2):103-5, 157-8. PubMed ID: 2509033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of postoperative hypoesthesia between two types of sagittal split ramus osteotomy and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy, using the trigeminal somatosensory-evoked potential method.
Takazakura D; Ueki K; Nakagawa K; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Shamiul A; Yamamoto E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jan; 36(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 17141470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vertical ramus versus sagittal split osteotomies: comparison of stability after mandibular setback.
Yoshioka I; Khanal A; Tominaga K; Horie A; Furuta N; Fukuda J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jun; 66(6):1138-44. PubMed ID: 18486778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Le Fort I osteotomy using an ultrasonic bone curette to fracture the pterygoid plates.
Ueki K; Nakagawa K; Marukawa K; Yamamoto E
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2004 Dec; 32(6):381-6. PubMed ID: 15555522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Complications of surgical treatment of mandibular prognathism].
Gaszyńska E; Kozakiewicz M
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2008 Jul; 25(145):27-31. PubMed ID: 18839610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing the effect of 3 orthognathic surgical methods on the mandibular range of movement.
Yazdani J; Ebrahimi H; Talesh KT; Khashabi E; Pourshahidi S; Tadbir AA
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):703-5. PubMed ID: 20485032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prevention of relapse following intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy mandibular setback: can coronoidotomy help?
Talesh KT; Motamedi MH; Yazdani J; Ghavimi A; Ghoreishizadeh A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 May; 111(5):557-60. PubMed ID: 20952228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stability of sagittal split ramus osteotomy used to correct Class III malocclusion: review of the literature.
Costa F; Robiony M; Politi M
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 11482290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The long term stability after orthognathic surgery in prognathic patients with mandibular asymmetry].
Lai W; Kazuhiro Y; Kooji H; Ritsuo T; Tadaharu K
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2003 Jan; 34(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 15600196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endoscopically assisted intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy and piezoelectric surgery in mandibular prognathism.
Robiony M; Polini F; Costa F; Sembronio S; Zerman N; Politi M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Oct; 65(10):2119-24. PubMed ID: 17884552
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Retrospective study of changes in the sensitivity of the oral mucosa: sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) versus intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO).
Hasegawa T; Tateishi C; Asai M; Imai Y; Okamoto N; Shioyasono A; Kimoto A; Akashi M; Suzuki H; Furudoi S; Komori T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 44(3):349-55. PubMed ID: 25468631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anatomical study of the complications of intraoral vertico-sagittal ramus osteotomy.
Fujimura K; Segami N; Kobayashi S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Mar; 64(3):384-9. PubMed ID: 16487798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of changing position and angle of the proximal segment after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy.
Ueki K; Hashiba Y; Marukawa K; Nakagawa K; Alam S; Okabe K; Yamamoto E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 38(10):1041-7. PubMed ID: 19477622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The assessment of blood loss in orthognathic surgery for prognathia.
Ueki K; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 63(3):350-4. PubMed ID: 15742286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
