BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20129787)

  • 1. Non-linear analysis of the structure of variability in midfoot kinematics.
    Rathleff MS; Olesen CG; Moelgaard CM; Jensen K; Madeleine P; Olesen JL
    Gait Posture; 2010 Mar; 31(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 20129787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Video based analysis of dynamic midfoot function and its relationship with Foot Posture Index scores.
    Nielsen RG; Rathleff MS; Moelgaard CM; Simonsen O; Kaalund S; Olesen CG; Christensen FB; Kersting UG
    Gait Posture; 2010 Jan; 31(1):126-30. PubMed ID: 19854653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationships between clinical measures of static foot posture and plantar pressure during static standing and walking.
    Jonely H; Brismée JM; Sizer PS; James CR
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Oct; 26(8):873-9. PubMed ID: 21632159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can the Foot Posture Index or their individual criteria predict dynamic plantar pressures?
    Sánchez-Rodríguez R; Martínez-Nova A; Escamilla-Martínez E; Pedrera-Zamorano JD
    Gait Posture; 2012 Jul; 36(3):591-5. PubMed ID: 22727718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Kinematic differences between normal and low arched feet in children using the Heidelberg foot measurement method.
    Twomey D; McIntosh AS; Simon J; Lowe K; Wolf SI
    Gait Posture; 2010 May; 32(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 20172730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sagittal plane kinematics of the foot during passive ankle dorsiflexion.
    Gatt A; Chockalingam N; Chevalier TL
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Dec; 35(4):425-31. PubMed ID: 21975851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of enhanced plantar sensory feedback and foot orthoses on midfoot kinematics and lower leg neuromuscular activation.
    Ritchie C; Paterson K; Bryant AL; Bartold S; Clark RA
    Gait Posture; 2011 Apr; 33(4):576-81. PubMed ID: 21353563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Kinematics reduction applied to the comparison of highly-pronated, normal and highly-supinated feet during walking.
    Sanchis-Sales E; Rodríguez-Cervantes PJ; Sancho-Bru JL
    Gait Posture; 2019 Feb; 68():269-273. PubMed ID: 30551052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perspectives for clinical measures of dynamic foot function-reference data and methodological considerations.
    Rathleff MS; Nielsen RG; Simonsen O; Olesen CG; Kersting UG
    Gait Posture; 2010 Feb; 31(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 19896851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting Dynamic Foot Function From Static Foot Posture: Comparison Between Visual Assessment, Motion Analysis, and a Commercially Available Depth Camera.
    Paterson KL; Clark RA; Mullins A; Bryant AL; Mentiplay BF
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2015 Oct; 45(10):789-98. PubMed ID: 26304638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Toe flexor strength is associated with mobility in older adults with pronated and supinated feet but not with neutral feet.
    Kusagawa Y; Kurihara T; Imai A; Maeo S; Sugiyama T; Kanehisa H; Isaka T
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2020 Sep; 13(1):55. PubMed ID: 32912250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Static foot posture associated with dynamic plantar pressure parameters.
    Teyhen DS; Stoltenberg BE; Eckard TG; Doyle PM; Boland DM; Feldtmann JJ; McPoil TG; Christie DS; Molloy JM; Goffar SL
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2011 Feb; 41(2):100-7. PubMed ID: 20972342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of low-mobile foot posture on multi-segment medial foot model gait kinematics.
    Cobb SC; Tis LL; Johnson JT; Wang YT; Geil MD; McCarty FA
    Gait Posture; 2009 Oct; 30(3):334-9. PubMed ID: 19615908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro study of foot kinematics using a dynamic walking cadaver model.
    Nester CJ; Liu AM; Ward E; Howard D; Cocheba J; Derrick T; Patterson P
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(9):1927-37. PubMed ID: 17081548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of subtalar joint motion during anticipated medial cutting turns and level walking using a multi-segment foot model.
    Jenkyn TR; Shultz R; Giffin JR; Birmingham TB
    Gait Posture; 2010 Feb; 31(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 19897368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of patellofemoral pain on foot posture and walking kinematics.
    Kedroff L; Galea Holmes MN; Amis A; Newham DJ
    Gait Posture; 2019 May; 70():361-369. PubMed ID: 30959427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic plantar pressure parameters associated with static arch height index during gait.
    Teyhen DS; Stoltenberg BE; Collinsworth KM; Giesel CL; Williams DG; Kardouni CH; Molloy JM; Goffar SL; Christie DS; McPoil T
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 May; 24(4):391-6. PubMed ID: 19246138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of static foot posture on the dynamic stiffness of foot joints during walking.
    Sanchis-Sales E; Sancho-Bru JL; Roda-Sales A; Pascual-Huerta J
    Gait Posture; 2018 May; 62():241-246. PubMed ID: 29574363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and validation of a novel rating system for scoring standing foot posture: the Foot Posture Index.
    Redmond AC; Crosbie J; Ouvrier RA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jan; 21(1):89-98. PubMed ID: 16182419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of a static measure to predict foot posture at midstance during walking.
    McPoil TG; Ford J; Fundaun J; Gallegos C; Kinney A; McMillan P; Murphy J; Sky E; Torba D; Bade M
    Foot (Edinb); 2016 Aug; 28():47-53. PubMed ID: 27736722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.