137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20129845)
1. Ideal AFROC and FROC observers.
Khurd P; Liu B; Gindi G
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Feb; 29(2):375-86. PubMed ID: 20129845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Performance assessment of mammographic diagnostic systems: evolution of methods and their application to a digital image study].
Compagnone G; Ferruzzi K; Pierotti L; Vianello Vos C; Berardi P; Bergamini C
Radiol Med; 1999 Mar; 97(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 10363062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Decision strategies that maximize the area under the LROC curve.
Khurd P; Gindi G
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Dec; 24(12):1626-36. PubMed ID: 16353373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Free-response methodology: alternate analysis and a new observer-performance experiment.
Chakraborty DP; Winter LH
Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):873-81. PubMed ID: 2305073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On the meaning of the weighted alternative free-response operating characteristic figure of merit.
Chakraborty DP; Zhai X
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2548. PubMed ID: 27147365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. ROC, LROC, FROC, AFROC: an alphabet soup.
He X; Frey E
J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Sep; 6(9):652-5. PubMed ID: 19720362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Nonparametric signal detectability evaluation using an exponential transformation of the FROC curve.
Popescu LM
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5690-702. PubMed ID: 21992384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Partial least squares: a method to estimate efficient channels for the ideal observers.
Witten JM; Park S; Myers KJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Apr; 29(4):1050-8. PubMed ID: 20335088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visual perception studies and observer models in medical imaging.
Burgess AE
Semin Nucl Med; 2011 Nov; 41(6):419-36. PubMed ID: 21978445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimization and FROC analysis of rule-based detection schemes using a multiobjective approach.
Anastasio MA; Kupinski MA; Nishikawa RM
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Dec; 17(6):1089-93. PubMed ID: 10048867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Utility as a rationale for choosing observer performance assessment paradigms for detection tasks in medical imaging.
Wunderlich A; Abbey CK
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111903. PubMed ID: 24320436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maximum likelihood fitting of FROC curves under an initial-detection-and-candidate-analysis model.
Edwards DC; Kupinski MA; Metz CE; Nishikawa RM
Med Phys; 2002 Dec; 29(12):2861-70. PubMed ID: 12512721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimization of restricted ROC surfaces in three-class classification tasks.
Edwards DC; Metz CE
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(10):1345-56. PubMed ID: 17948725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Receiver operating characteristic analysis: a tool for the quantitative evaluation of observer performance and imaging systems.
Metz CE
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Jun; 3(6):413-22. PubMed ID: 17412096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perceptually based FROC analysis.
Arora R; Kundel HL; Beam CA
Acad Radiol; 2005 Dec; 12(12):1567-74. PubMed ID: 16321746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimal Joint Detection and Estimation That Maximizes ROC-Type Curves.
Wunderlich A; Goossens B; Abbey CK
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2016 Sep; 35(9):2164-73. PubMed ID: 27093544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation of free-response and receiver-operating-characteristic area-under-the-curve estimates: results from independently conducted FROC∕ROC studies in mammography.
Zanca F; Hillis SL; Claus F; Van Ongeval C; Celis V; Provoost V; Yoon HJ; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):5917-29. PubMed ID: 23039631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Singular vectors of a linear imaging system as efficient channels for the bayesian ideal observer.
Park S; Witten JM; Myers KJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 May; 28(5):657-68. PubMed ID: 19272990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Statistical power in observer-performance studies: comparison of the receiver operating characteristic and free-response methods in tasks involving localization.
Chakraborty D
Acad Radiol; 2002 Feb; 9(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 11918367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. VIEWDEX: an efficient and easy-to-use software for observer performance studies.
Håkansson M; Svensson S; Zachrisson S; Svalkvist A; Båth M; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):42-51. PubMed ID: 20200105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
