279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20130489)
21. A biomechanical assessment of soft-tissue damage in the cervical spine following a unilateral facet injury.
Nadeau M; McLachlin SD; Bailey SI; Gurr KR; Dunning CE; Bailey CS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Nov; 94(21):e156. PubMed ID: 23138243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The pediatric cervical spine instability study. A pilot study assessing the prognostic value of four imaging modalities in clearing the cervical spine for children with severe traumatic injuries.
Brockmeyer DL; Ragel BT; Kestle JR
Childs Nerv Syst; 2012 May; 28(5):699-705. PubMed ID: 22290498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Occult subaxial cervical disco-ligamentous injuries in computer tomography negative trauma patients.
Lin JL; Samuel S; Gray R; Ruff S; Vasili C; Cree A; Hartin N
Eur Spine J; 2017 Apr; 26(4):1277-1283. PubMed ID: 28028650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A novel operative approach for the treatment of old distractive flexion injuries of subaxial cervical spine.
Liu P; Zhao J; Liu F; Liu M; Fan W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jun; 33(13):1459-64. PubMed ID: 18520941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. In vitro low-speed side collisions cause injury to the lower cervical spine but do not damage alar ligaments.
Hartwig E; Kettler A; Schultheiss M; Kinzl L; Claes L; Wilke HJ
Eur Spine J; 2004 Nov; 13(7):590-7. PubMed ID: 15221568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Load-displacement properties of the normal and injured lower cervical spine in vitro.
Richter M; Wilke HJ; Kluger P; Claes L; Puhl W
Eur Spine J; 2000 Apr; 9(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 10823425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Delayed presentation of cervical ligamentous instability without radiologic evidence.
Shah VM; Marco RA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(5):E168-74; discussion E175. PubMed ID: 17334279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The importance of the posterior osteoligamentous complex to subaxial cervical spine stability in relation to a unilateral facet injury.
Rasoulinejad P; McLachlin SD; Bailey SI; Gurr KR; Bailey CS; Dunning CE
Spine J; 2012 Jul; 12(7):590-5. PubMed ID: 22906620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The provocative radiographic traction test for diagnosing craniocervical dissociation: a cadaveric biomechanical study and reappraisal of the pathogenesis of instability.
Child Z; Rau D; Lee MJ; Ching R; Bransford R; Chapman J; Bellabarba C
Spine J; 2016 Sep; 16(9):1116-23. PubMed ID: 27283520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cervical spine disc prosthesis: radiographic, biomechanical and morphological post mortal findings 12 weeks after implantation. A retrieval example.
Pitzen T; Kettler A; Drumm J; Nabhan A; Steudel WI; Claes L; Wilke HJ
Eur Spine J; 2007 Jul; 16(7):1015-20. PubMed ID: 17242873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Biomechanical analysis of the three-dimensional motion pattern of the canine cervical spine segment C4-C5.
Hofstetter M; Gédet P; Doherr M; Ferguson SJ; Forterre F
Vet Surg; 2009 Jan; 38(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 19152617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [The biomechanics of hyperextension injuries of the subaxial cervical spine].
Stein G; Meyer C; Ingenhoff L; Bredow J; Müller LP; Eysel P; Schiffer G
Unfallchirurg; 2017 Jul; 120(7):590-594. PubMed ID: 27220520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Magnetic resonance evaluation of the intervertebral disc, spinal ligaments, and spinal cord before and after closed traction reduction of cervical spine dislocations.
Vaccaro AR; Falatyn SP; Flanders AE; Balderston RA; Northrup BE; Cotler JM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Jun; 24(12):1210-7. PubMed ID: 10382247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. In vitro evaluation of a ball-and-socket cervical disc prosthesis with cranial geometric center.
Barrey C; Mosnier T; Jund J; Perrin G; Skalli W
J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Nov; 11(5):538-46. PubMed ID: 19929355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.
Sasso RC; Best NM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities.
McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Hayes V; Sidiqi F; Dabbah M; Sefter JC; Hu N; Beatson H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19 Suppl):S152-60. PubMed ID: 16946633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervicothoracic fusion: impact of partial or sequential fixation.
Cheng BC; Hafez MA; Cunningham B; Serhan H; Welch WC
Spine J; 2008; 8(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 17981098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of the Vacuum Mattress versus the Spine Board Alone for Immobilization of the Cervical Spine Injured Patient: A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study.
Prasarn ML; Hyldmo PK; Zdziarski LA; Loewy E; Dubose D; Horodyski M; Rechtine GR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Dec; 42(24):E1398-E1402. PubMed ID: 28591075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Biomechanical evaluation of surgical constructs for stabilization of cervical teardrop fractures.
Ianuzzi A; Zambrano I; Tataria J; Ameerally A; Agulnick M; Goodwin JS; Stephen M; Khalsa PS
Spine J; 2006; 6(5):514-23. PubMed ID: 16934720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
