108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20130688)
1. Optimization and validation of rep-PCR genotypic libraries for microbial source tracking of environmental Escherichia coli isolates.
Lyautey E; Lu Z; Lapen DR; Berkers TE; Edge TA; Topp E
Can J Microbiol; 2010 Jan; 56(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 20130688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genotype diversity of Escherichia coli isolates in natural waters determined by PFGE and ERIC-PCR.
Casarez EA; Pillai SD; Di Giovanni GD
Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3643-8. PubMed ID: 17475306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Direct comparison of four bacterial source tracking methods and use of composite data sets.
Casarez EA; Pillai SD; Mott JB; Vargas M; Dean KE; Di Giovanni GD
J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Aug; 103(2):350-64. PubMed ID: 17650195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of antibiotic resistance analysis and ribotyping for identification of faecal pollution sources in an urban watershed.
Moore DF; Harwood VJ; Ferguson DM; Lukasik J; Hannah P; Getrich M; Brownell M
J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 99(3):618-28. PubMed ID: 16108804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of five rep-PCR genomic fingerprinting methods for differentiation of fecal Escherichia coli from humans, poultry and wild birds.
Mohapatra BR; Broersma K; Mazumder A
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2007 Dec; 277(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 17986090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microbial source tracking by DNA sequence analysis of the Escherichia coli malate dehydrogenase gene.
Ivanetich KM; Hsu PH; Wunderlich KM; Messenger E; Walkup WG; Scott TM; Lukasik J; Davis J
J Microbiol Methods; 2006 Dec; 67(3):507-26. PubMed ID: 16973226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Repetitive element (REP)-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of Escherichia coli isolates from recreational waters of southeastern Lake Huron.
Kon T; Weir SC; Howell ET; Lee H; Trevors JT
Can J Microbiol; 2009 Mar; 55(3):269-76. PubMed ID: 19370070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fidelity of bacterial source tracking: Escherichia coli vs Enterococcus spp and minimizing assignment of isolates from nonlibrary sources.
Hassan WM; Ellender RD; Wang SY
J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Feb; 102(2):591-8. PubMed ID: 17241366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative efficacy of five different rep-PCR methods to discriminate Escherichia coli populations in aquatic environments.
Mohapatra BR; Mazumder A
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(3):537-47. PubMed ID: 18725719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sample size, library composition, and genotypic diversity among natural populations of Escherichia coli from different animals influence accuracy of determining sources of fecal pollution.
Johnson LK; Brown MB; Carruthers EA; Ferguson JA; Dombek PE; Sadowsky MJ
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2004 Aug; 70(8):4478-85. PubMed ID: 15294775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiple lines of evidence to identify the sources of fecal pollution at a freshwater beach in Hamilton Harbour, Lake Ontario.
Edge TA; Hill S
Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3585-94. PubMed ID: 17575998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of statistical methods used in library-based approaches to microbial source tracking.
Ritter KJ; Carruthers E; Carson CA; Ellender RD; Harwood VJ; Kingsley K; Nakatsu C; Sadowsky M; Shear B; West B; Whitlock JE; Wiggins BA; Wilbur JD
J Water Health; 2003 Dec; 1(4):209-23. PubMed ID: 15382725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Population structure of Cladophora-borne Escherichia coli in nearshore water of Lake Michigan.
Byappanahalli MN; Whitman RL; Shively DA; Ferguson J; Ishii S; Sadowsky MJ
Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3649-54. PubMed ID: 17451778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Identifying fecal sources in a selected catchment reach using multiple source-tracking tools.
Vogel JR; Stoeckel DM; Lamendella R; Zelt RB; Santo Domingo JW; Walker SR; Oerther DB
J Environ Qual; 2007; 36(3):718-29. PubMed ID: 17412907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Library-dependent and library-independent microbial source tracking to identify spatial variation in faecal contamination sources along a Lake Ontario beach (Ontario, Canada).
Edge TA; Hill S; Seto P; Marsalek J
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(3):719-27. PubMed ID: 20706020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Wildlife identified as major source of Escherichia coli in agriculturally dominated watersheds by BOX A1R-derived genetic fingerprints.
Somarelli JA; Makarewicz JC; Sia R; Simon R
J Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 82(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 16551490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Choice of indicator organism and library size considerations for phenotypic microbial source tracking by FAME profiling.
Duran M; Yurtsever D; Dunaev T
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(10):2659-68. PubMed ID: 19923772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sourcing faecal pollution: a combination of library-dependent and library-independent methods to identify human faecal pollution in non-sewered catchments.
Ahmed W; Stewart J; Gardner T; Powell D; Brooks P; Sullivan D; Tindale N
Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3771-9. PubMed ID: 17482658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Occurrence of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from surface waters and fecal pollution sources near Hamilton, Ontario.
Edge TA; Hill S
Can J Microbiol; 2005 Jun; 51(6):501-5. PubMed ID: 16121229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Considerations when using discriminant function analysis of antimicrobial resistance profiles to identify sources of fecal contamination of surface water in Michigan.
Kaneene JB; Miller R; Sayah R; Johnson YJ; Gilliland D; Gardiner JC
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2007 May; 73(9):2878-90. PubMed ID: 17337537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
