168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20131537)
1. [Ligasure haemorrhoidectomy. Personal experience].
Mistrangelo M; Mussa B; Brustia R; Gavello G; Mussa A
Ann Ital Chir; 2009; 80(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 20131537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomised trial comparing LigaSure haemorrhoidectomy with the diathermy dissection operation.
Milito G; Gargiani M; Cortese F
Tech Coloproctol; 2002 Dec; 6(3):171-5. PubMed ID: 12525911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure versus conventional diathermy for day-case haemorrhoidectomy.
Jayne DG; Botterill I; Ambrose NS; Brennan TG; Guillou PJ; O'Riordain DS
Br J Surg; 2002 Apr; 89(4):428-32. PubMed ID: 11952582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled clinical trial of Ligasure compared with Milligan-Morgan operation.
Thorbeck CV; Montes MF
Eur J Surg; 2002; 168(8-9):482-4. PubMed ID: 12549689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The gold standard in the treatment of haemorrhoidal disease. Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy vs Longo mucoprolapsectomy: comparing techniques].
Candela G; Varriale S; Di Libero L; Manetta F; Maschio A; Giordano M; Pizza A; Sciascia V; Napolitano S; Santini L
Minerva Chir; 2007 Jun; 62(3):151-9. PubMed ID: 17519839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Randomized clinical trial of LigaSure and conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy.
Muzi MG; Milito G; Nigro C; Cadeddu F; Andreoli F; Amabile D; Farinon AM
Br J Surg; 2007 Aug; 94(8):937-42. PubMed ID: 17636512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Transfixed stitches technique versus open haemorrhoidectomy. Results of a randomised trial].
Gaj F; Trecca A; Crispino P
Chir Ital; 2007; 59(2):231-5. PubMed ID: 17500180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcome of stapled haemorrhoidectomy versus Milligan Morgan's haemorrhoidectomy.
Khan NF; Hussain Shah SS; Bokhari I; Mahboob S; Gulfam MA; Ghayasuddin M; Khan A; Rasul S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2009 Sep; 19(9):561-5. PubMed ID: 19728941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy with ultrasonic scalpel].
Di Vita G; Patti R; Petrone R; Arcara M; Sieli G
G Chir; 2003; 24(11-12):422-7. PubMed ID: 15018412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy, modified by using the Ligasure radiofrequency coagulator].
Carditello A; Stilo F
Chir Ital; 2007; 59(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 17361937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ligasure trademark vs conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy: long-term follow-up of a randomised clinical trial.
Peters CJ; Botterill I; Ambrose NS; Hick D; Casey J; Jayne DG
Colorectal Dis; 2005 Jul; 7(4):350-3. PubMed ID: 15932557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcome of the rubber band ligation with Milligan Morgan haemorrhoidectomy.
Ali SA; Mohammad AT; Jarwar M; Imran J; Siddique AJ; Dalwani AG
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2010; 22(4):56-60. PubMed ID: 22455262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ligasure Precise vs. conventional diathermy for Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial.
Altomare DF; Milito G; Andreoli R; Arcanà F; Tricomi N; Salafia C; Segre D; Pecorella G; Pulvirenti d'Urso A; Cracco N; Giovanardi G; Romano G;
Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 May; 51(5):514-9. PubMed ID: 18231834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical treatment of haemorrhoidal disease with CO2 laser and Milligan-Morgan cold scalpel technique.
Pandini LC; Nahas SC; Nahas CS; Marques CF; Sobrado CW; Kiss DR
Colorectal Dis; 2006 Sep; 8(7):592-5. PubMed ID: 16919112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pain after conventional versus Ligasure haemorrhoidectomy. A meta-analysis.
Nienhuijs SW; de Hingh IH
Int J Surg; 2010; 8(4):269-73. PubMed ID: 20388563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure versus open haemorrhoidectomy.
Palazzo FF; Francis DL; Clifton MA
Br J Surg; 2002 Feb; 89(2):154-7. PubMed ID: 11856126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy.
Ortiz H; Marzo J; Armendariz P
Br J Surg; 2002 Nov; 89(11):1376-81. PubMed ID: 12390376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy.
Shalaby R; Desoky A
Br J Surg; 2001 Aug; 88(8):1049-53. PubMed ID: 11488788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Haemorrhoidectomy with Ligasure vs conventional excisional techniques: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Milito G; Cadeddu F; Muzi MG; Nigro C; Farinon AM
Colorectal Dis; 2010 Feb; 12(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 19220374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomised trial comparing submucosal haemorrhoidectomy with radiofrequency bistoury vs. diathermic haemorrhoidectomy.
Filingeri V; Gravante G; Baldessari E; Craboledda P; Bellati F; Casciani CU
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2004; 8(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 15267121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
