129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2013206)
1. Comparison of the Kallested Pathfinder EIA, cytocentrifuged direct fluorescent antibody, and cell culture for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
LeBar W; Schubiner H; Jemal C; Herschman B; Criswell K; Curtin N; Sherbeck M
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1991; 14(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 2013206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of chlamydiazyme for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital infections.
Monno R; De Vito D; Vena GA; Mosca A; Miragliotta G
Microbiologica; 1987 Oct; 10(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 3320688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cytobrush in collection of cervical specimens for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
Moncada J; Schachter J; Shipp M; Bolan G; Wilber J
J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Aug; 27(8):1863-6. PubMed ID: 2671035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of three techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens from asymptomatic women.
Lefebvre J; Laperrière H; Rousseau H; Massé R
J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Apr; 26(4):726-31. PubMed ID: 3284899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Head-to-head evaluation of five chlamydia tests relative to a quality-assured culture standard.
Newhall WJ; Johnson RE; DeLisle S; Fine D; Hadgu A; Matsuda B; Osmond D; Campbell J; Stamm WE
J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Mar; 37(3):681-5. PubMed ID: 9986831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multicenter comparative evaluation of two rapid microscopic methods and culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in patient specimens.
Tilton RC; Judson FN; Barnes RC; Gruninger RP; Ryan RW; Steingrimsson O
J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Feb; 26(2):167-70. PubMed ID: 3277994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of an enzyme immunoassay and cell culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genito-urinary specimens.
Jensen BL; Hoff G; Weismann K
Sex Transm Dis; 1988; 15(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 3041629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in adolescent females using direct immunofluorescence.
Evans DL; Demetriou E; Shalaby H; Waner JL
Clin Pediatr (Phila); 1988 May; 27(5):223-8. PubMed ID: 3284687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chlamydial cervicitis: role of culture, enzyme immunoassay and Giemsa cytology in diagnosis.
Mittal A; Kapur S; Gupta S
APMIS; 1993 Jan; 101(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 8457324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A 1-year evaluation of Syva MicroTrak Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay with selective confirmation by direct fluorescent-antibody assay in a high-volume laboratory.
Chan EL; Brandt K; Horsman GB
J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Sep; 32(9):2208-11. PubMed ID: 7814548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women attending urban midwestern family planning and community health clinics: risk factors, selective screening, and evaluation of non-culture techniques.
Addiss DG; Vaughn ML; Golubjatnikov R; Pfister J; Kurtycz DF; Davis JP
Sex Transm Dis; 1990; 17(3):138-46. PubMed ID: 2247804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of PCR and direct immunofluorescence microscopy for confirmation of results obtained by Syva MicroTrak Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay.
Ostergaard L; Møller JK
J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Oct; 33(10):2620-3. PubMed ID: 8567894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Confirmation of the Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay for chlamydia trachomatis by Syva Direct Fluorescent Antibody Test.
Beebe JL; Masters H; Jungkind D; Heltzel DM; Weinberg A
Sex Transm Dis; 1996; 23(6):465-70. PubMed ID: 8946630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay and Gen-Probe PACE 2 with cell culture for diagnosis of cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a high-prevalence female population.
Clarke LM; Sierra MF; Daidone BJ; Lopez N; Covino JM; McCormack WM
J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Apr; 31(4):968-71. PubMed ID: 7681852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Polymerase chain reaction for detection of endocervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women attending a gynecology outpatient department in India.
Singh V; Rastogi S; Garg S; Kapur S; Kumar A; Salhan S; Mittal A
Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(3):540-4. PubMed ID: 12040650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a commercial enzyme immunoassay versus culture for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
Bäckman M; Rudén AK; Ringertz O; Sanström EG
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1989 Sep; 8(9):778-82. PubMed ID: 2480238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in routine clinical practice: increased sensitivity of cell culture in comparison with the microimmunofluorescence test].
Sterzik K; Rosenbusch B; Danner B; Heeg KM; Wolf A; Lauritzen C
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1988 Dec; 48(12):881-3. PubMed ID: 3069566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Use of direct and serologic methods to detect Chlamydia trachomatis infections in cervix uteri of women].
Kazanowska W; Zdrodowska-Stefanow B; Kuczyńska K
Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 1993; 45(3):349-55. PubMed ID: 8189809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Chlamydia trachomatis confirmatory testing of PCR-positive genitourinary specimens using a second set of plasmid primers.
Mahony JB; Luinstra KE; Jang D; Sellors J; Chernesky MA
Mol Cell Probes; 1992 Oct; 6(5):381-8. PubMed ID: 1474977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Demonstration of Chlamydia trachomatis in Papanicolaou-stained gynecological smears.
Rantala I; Kivinen S
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1998 Jan; 17(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 9512183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
