These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20132324)
1. A hybrid finite-difference and analytic element groundwater model. Haitjema HM; Feinstein DT; Hunt RJ; Gusyev MA Ground Water; 2010; 48(4):538-48. PubMed ID: 20132324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Field Test of a Hybrid Finite-Difference and Analytic Element Regional Model. Abrams DB; Haitjema HM; Feinstein DT; Hunt RJ Ground Water; 2016 Jan; 54(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 25628100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Semi-Structured MODFLOW-USG Model to Evaluate Local Water Sources to Wells for Decision Support. Feinstein DT; Fienen MN; Reeves HW; Langevin CD Ground Water; 2016 Jul; 54(4):532-44. PubMed ID: 26757094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of local grid refinement methods for MODFLOW. Mehl S; Hill MC; Leake SA Ground Water; 2006; 44(6):792-6. PubMed ID: 17087750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modeling surface water-groundwater interaction with MODFLOW: some considerations. Brunner P; Simmons CT; Cook PG; Therrien R Ground Water; 2010; 48(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 19891721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Incorporating groundwater-surface water interaction into river management models. Valerio A; Rajaram H; Zagona E Ground Water; 2010; 48(5):661-73. PubMed ID: 20412319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The turning factor in the estimation of stream-aquifer seepage. Morel-Seytoux HJ Ground Water; 2009; 47(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 19016894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of nested flow models and interpolation techniques for science-based management of the Sheyenne National Grassland, North Dakota, USA. Gusyev MA; Haitjema HM; Carlson CP; Gonzalez MA Ground Water; 2013; 51(3):414-20. PubMed ID: 23013059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The combined use of MODFLOW and precipitation-runoff modeling to simulate groundwater flow in a diffuse-pollution prone watershed. Elçi A; Karadaş D; Fistikoğlu O Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(1):180-8. PubMed ID: 20595769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The groundwater contribution to surface water contamination in a region with intensive agricultural land use (Noord-Brabant, The Netherlands). Rozemeijer JC; Broers HP Environ Pollut; 2007 Aug; 148(3):695-706. PubMed ID: 17418466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of elevation resolution on evapotranspiration simulations using MODFLOW. Kambhammettu BV; Schmid W; King JP; Creel BJ Ground Water; 2012; 50(3):367-75. PubMed ID: 21916891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved water table dynamics in MODFLOW. Clemo T Ground Water; 2005; 43(2):270-3. PubMed ID: 15819948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new package in MODFLOW to simulate unconfined groundwater flow in sloping aquifers. Wang Q; Zhan H; Tang Z Ground Water; 2014; 52(6):924-35. PubMed ID: 24299562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analytic element ground water modeling as a research program (1980 to 2006). Kraemer SR Ground Water; 2007; 45(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 17600570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An assembly model for simulation of large-scale ground water flow and transport. Huang J; Christ JA; Goltz MN Ground Water; 2008; 46(6):882-92. PubMed ID: 18715260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]