BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

595 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20132565)

  • 1. [Fewer breech deliveries after implementation of a modified cephalic version protocol].
    Kuppens SM; Francois AM; Hasaart TH; van der Donk MW; Pop VJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A63. PubMed ID: 20132565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Fewer caesarean sections for breech presentation following external cephalic version according to a protocol in a special office visit].
    Kuppens SM; Hasaart TH; van der Donk MW; Huibers M; Franssen MJ; de Becker BM; Wijnen HA; Pop VJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Jun; 152(23):1323-8. PubMed ID: 18661859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Successful but limited use of external cephalic version in Auckland.
    Wise MR; Sadler L; Ansell D
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 48(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 19032661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. External cephalic version with salbutamol - success rate and predictors of success.
    Tasnim N; Mahmud G; Khurshid M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2009 Feb; 19(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 19208311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [External cephalic version for breech presentation at term: an effective procedure to reduce the caesarean section rate].
    Lojacono A; Donarini G; Valcamonico A; Soregaroli M; Frusca T
    Minerva Ginecol; 2003 Dec; 55(6):519-24. PubMed ID: 14676741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcome of external cephalic version after 36 weeks' gestation without tocolysis.
    Impey L; Lissoni D
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1999; 8(5):203-7. PubMed ID: 10475501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Oral nifepidine versus subcutaneous terbutaline tocolysis for external cephalic version: a double-blind randomised trial.
    Collaris R; Tan PC
    BJOG; 2009 Jan; 116(1):74-80; discussion 80-1. PubMed ID: 19087079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term: predictors of success, and impact on the rate of caesarean section.
    Hussin OA; Mahmoud MA; Abdel-Fattah MM
    East Mediterr Health J; 2013 Feb; 19(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 23516827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tocolysis for repeat external cephalic version in breech presentation at term: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.
    Impey L; Pandit M
    BJOG; 2005 May; 112(5):627-31. PubMed ID: 15842288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A simple patient-initiated intervention to increase antenatal detection of breech presentation at term.
    Roberts CL; Cameron CA; Nassar N; Raynes-Greenow CH
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 18(5):371-6. PubMed ID: 15367324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy of external cephalic version with tocolysis in late pregnancy.
    Rueangchainikhom W; Sarapak S; Prommas S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Jan; 91(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 18386539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety and efficacy of external cephalic version for women with a previous cesarean delivery.
    Sela HY; Fiegenberg T; Ben-Meir A; Elchalal U; Ezra Y
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Feb; 142(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 19019528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sheffield modified technique for external cephalic version.
    Keriakos R; Abdelmalek B; Campbell L
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Jul; 29(5):384-7. PubMed ID: 19603313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A retrospective study of the success, safety and effectiveness of external cephalic version without tocolysis in a specialised midwifery centre in the Netherlands.
    Rijnders M; Herschderfer K; Prins M; van Baaren R; van Veelen AJ; Schönbeck Y; Buitendijk S
    Midwifery; 2008 Mar; 24(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 17196716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Delivery mode and neonatal outcome after a trial of external cephalic version (ECV): a prospective trial of vaginal breech versus cephalic delivery.
    Reinhard J; Sänger N; Hanker L; Reichenbach L; Yuan J; Herrmann E; Louwen F
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Apr; 287(4):663-8. PubMed ID: 23183715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Introducing routine external cephalic version for the management of the malpresenting fetus near term.
    Devendra K
    Med J Malaysia; 2002 Dec; 57(4):454-9. PubMed ID: 12733170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [External cephalic version of breech presentation].
    Sande HA
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1993 Oct; 113(25):3153-4. PubMed ID: 8273041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [External cephalic version as a possible treatment of breech presentation].
    Giusti M; Bertolotti GC; Nappi RE; Fignon A; Zara C
    Minerva Ginecol; 2000 Jun; 52(6):221-7. PubMed ID: 11085044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. External cephalic version in singleton pregnancies at term: a retrospective analysis.
    Zeck W; Walcher W; Lang U
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2008; 66(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 18230911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of parity on obstetric and neonatal outcome of external cephalic version.
    El-Toukhy T; Ramadan G; Maidman D; Hanna L; Waterstone M
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Aug; 27(6):580-4. PubMed ID: 17896255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.