These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20134676)
1. Multiple-Sine-Slit Microdensitometer and MTF Evaluation for High Resolution Emulsions. 1: Theory and Mode of Operation. Johansson S; Biedermann K Appl Opt; 1974 Oct; 13(10):2280-7. PubMed ID: 20134676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multiple-Sine-Slit Microdensitometer and MTF Evaluation for High Resolution Emulsions. 2: MTF Data and Other Recording Parameters of High Resolution Emulsions for Holography. Johansson S; Biedermann K Appl Opt; 1974 Oct; 13(10):2288-91. PubMed ID: 20134677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An instrument for recording the optical-path variation of transmitting objects. Lamberts RL Appl Opt; 1970 Jun; 9(6):1345-56. PubMed ID: 20076383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental demonstration of coherence effects and linearity in microdensitometry. Reynolds GO; Smith AE Appl Opt; 1973 Jun; 12(6):1259-70. PubMed ID: 20125508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of microdensitometer scan slit misalignment in MTF determinations. Villafana T Med Phys; 1975; 2(5):255-8. PubMed ID: 1186631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modulation transfer function of a finite scanning microdensitometer slit. Villafana T Med Phys; 1975; 2(5):251-4. PubMed ID: 1186630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of radiographic screen-film systems: a comparison between the use of a microdensitometer and a drum film digitiser. Verdun FR; Pachoud M; Bergmann D; Buhr E Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):208-13. PubMed ID: 15933110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modulation transfer function measurement technique for small-pixel detectors. Marchywka M; Socker DG Appl Opt; 1992 Dec; 31(34):7198-213. PubMed ID: 20802584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Wiener spectrum of radiographic systems: comparison of different evaluation methods. Bregant P; De Denaro M; De Guarrini F; Borasi G Radiol Med; 1997 May; 93(5):613-7. PubMed ID: 9251741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modulation transfer functions of low power telescopes. Katz M; Citek K Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1988 Mar; 65(3):198-208. PubMed ID: 3364528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Objective evaluation of the relative modulation transfer function of densitometers for digitisation of electron micrographs. Roseman AM; Neumann K Ultramicroscopy; 2003 Aug; 96(2):207-18. PubMed ID: 12672572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modulation transfer function evaluation of linear solid-state x-ray-sensitive detectors using edge techniques. Zhu YM; Kaftandjian V; Peix G; Babot D Appl Opt; 1995 Aug; 34(22):4937-43. PubMed ID: 21052336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modeling imager deterministic and statistical modulation transfer functions. Johnson JF Appl Opt; 1993 Nov; 32(32):6503-13. PubMed ID: 20856491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A double beam, high resolution spectrometerfor the far infrared. Hard TM; Lord RC Appl Opt; 1968 Apr; 7(4):589-98. PubMed ID: 20068643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]