BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20135302)

  • 21. Medium-term comparison of uterus preservation versus hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse treatment with Prolift™ mesh.
    Huang LY; Chu LC; Chiang HJ; Chuang FC; Kung FT; Huang KH
    Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Jul; 26(7):1013-20. PubMed ID: 25600353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Adnexal surgery at the time of hysterectomy in women 65 years and older undergoing hysterectomy for prolapse: do practice trends differ by route of surgery?
    Greene KA; Wyman AM; Tamhane N; Tanner JP; Bassaly RM; Salemi JL
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Aug; 32(8):2185-2193. PubMed ID: 33660000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Uterine-preserving pelvic organ prolapse surgery using the UPHOLD LITE vaginal support system: The outcomes of 291 patients.
    Chang CP; Hsu FK; Lai MJ; Chang WH; Lee NR; Lee HL; Horng HC; Wang PH
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Apr; 98(14):e15086. PubMed ID: 30946362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Trends in apical prolapse surgery between 2010 and 2016 in Denmark.
    Husby KR; Lose G; Klarskov N
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):321-327. PubMed ID: 30610266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Laparoscopic hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse: a prospective randomized pilot study.
    Rahmanou P; Price N; Jackson SR
    Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Nov; 26(11):1687-94. PubMed ID: 26142347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Changing routes of hysterectomy: a cross sectional and comparative study.
    Shrestha NS; Saha R; Karki C
    Nepal Med Coll J; 2010 Sep; 12(3):176-9. PubMed ID: 21446367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.
    Schulten SFM; Detollenaere RJ; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HWF
    BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Systematic classification of uterine cervical elongation in patients with pelvic organ prolapse.
    Mothes AR; Mothes H; Fröber R; Radosa MP; Runnebaum IB
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 May; 200():40-4. PubMed ID: 26967345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Risk factors for recurrence after Le Fort colpocleisis for severe pelvic organ prolapse in elderly women.
    Krissi H; Aviram A; Eitan R; From A; Wiznitzer A; Peled Y
    Int J Surg; 2015 Aug; 20():75-9. PubMed ID: 26079498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cervical amputation versus vaginal hysterectomy: a population-based register study.
    Bergman I; Söderberg MW; Kjaeldgaard A; Ek M
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Feb; 28(2):257-266. PubMed ID: 27530518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Attitudes toward hysterectomy in women undergoing evaluation for uterovaginal prolapse.
    Frick AC; Barber MD; Paraiso MF; Ridgeway B; Jelovsek JE; Walters MD
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2013; 19(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 23442508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of two vaginal, uterus sparing operations for pelvic organ prolapse: modified Manchester operation (MM) and sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH), a study protocol for a multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial (the SAM study).
    Schulten SFM; Enklaar RA; Kluivers KB; van Leijsen SAL; Jansen-van der Weide MC; Adang EMM; van Bavel J; van Dongen H; Gerritse MBE; van Gestel I; Malmberg GGA; Mouw RJC; van Rumpt-van de Geest DA; Spaans WA; van der Steen A; Stekelenburg J; Tiersma ESM; Verkleij-Hagoort AC; Vollebregt A; Wingen CBM; Weemhoff M; van Eijndhoven HWF
    BMC Womens Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):49. PubMed ID: 30940171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Modified extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension for prevention of vault prolapse after vaginal hysterectomy.
    Pal M; Bandyopadhyay S
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):633-637. PubMed ID: 29777272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Vaginal hysterectomy for the enlarged non-prolapse uterus using morcellation techniques and/or Deschamps needle: a retrospective cohort study].
    Santos-López A; Gorbea-Chávez V; Rodríguez-Colorado S; Ramírez C; Torres-Valdéz E; Gámez-Guerrero P
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2015 Mar; 83(3):148-54. PubMed ID: 26058167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.
    Detollenaere RJ; Kreuwel IA; Dijkstra JR; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
    J Sex Med; 2016 Feb; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Manchester procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy in the treatment of uterine prolapse: a review.
    Tolstrup CK; Lose G; Klarskov N
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Jan; 28(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 27485234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Rates of unanticipated premalignant and malignant lesions at the time of hysterectomy performed for pelvic organ prolapse in an underscreened population.
    Barakzai S; Koltun-Baker E; Melville SJF; Rangel E; Dahl M; Dancz CE
    AJOG Glob Rep; 2023 May; 3(2):100217. PubMed ID: 37275440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Patient beliefs regarding hysterectomy in women seeking surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: findings in a predominantly Hispanic population.
    Wong K; Jakus-Waldman S; Yazdany T
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(5):267-71. PubMed ID: 25181376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery after native tissue vault suspension at hysterectomy-A prospective cohort study.
    Bonde L; Østergaard L; Fosbøl EL; Møller LA; Ottesen B; Gislason GH; Gimbel H
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Sep; 240():144-150. PubMed ID: 31284088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Anatomical and functional outcomes of uterus preservation and pelvic organ prolapse repair with vaginal trocar-less mesh kit (Endofast): A retrospective study of 239 patients.
    Zangen R; Ben Shachar I; Marcus N
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Mar; 258():223-227. PubMed ID: 33453524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.