204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2013546)
1. Effects of the crossed acoustic reflex on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in awake rabbits.
Whitehead ML; Martin GK; Lonsbury-Martin BL
Hear Res; 1991 Jan; 51(1):55-72. PubMed ID: 2013546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of olivocochlear bundle section on otoacoustic emissions in humans: efferent effects in comparison with control subjects.
Williams EA; Brookes GB; Prasher DK
Acta Otolaryngol; 1994 Mar; 114(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 8203191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans.
Moulin A; Collet L; Duclaux R
Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):193-210. PubMed ID: 8458751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contralateral suppression of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions declines with age: a comparison of findings in CBA mice with human listeners.
Jacobson M; Kim S; Romney J; Zhu X; Frisina RD
Laryngoscope; 2003 Oct; 113(10):1707-13. PubMed ID: 14520094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Amplitude modulation of DPOAEs by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear.
Harrison RV; Sharma A; Brown T; Jiwani S; James AL
Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 128(4):404-7. PubMed ID: 18368574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of contralateral acoustic stimulation on the quadratic distortion product f2-f1 in humans.
Wittekindt A; Gaese BH; Kössl M
Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 18951964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term sound conditioning increases distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitudes and decreases olivocochlear efferent reflex strength.
Peng JH; Tao ZZ; Huang ZW
Neuroreport; 2007 Jul; 18(11):1167-70. PubMed ID: 17589320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spontaneous otoacoustic emission recordings during contralateral pure-tone activation of medial olivocochlear reflex.
Bulut E; Öztürk L
Physiol Int; 2017 Jun; 104(2):171-182. PubMed ID: 28648121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions predicts susceptibility to acoustic over-exposure in alert rabbits.
Luebke AE; Stagner BB; Martin GK; Lonsbury-Martin BL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Apr; 135(4):1941-9. PubMed ID: 25234992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on otoacoustic emissions following vestibular neurectomy.
Williams EA; Brookes GB; Prasher DK
Scand Audiol; 1993; 22(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 8210961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE) on acoustic distortion product input/output functions: does the medial efferent system act differently in the vicinity of an SOAE?
Moulin A; Collet L; Morgon A
Acta Otolaryngol; 1992; 112(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 1604981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. I. Enhancement of compound action potentials to masked tones.
Kawase T; Liberman MC
J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2519-32. PubMed ID: 8120596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does hyperandrogenism affect the otoacoustic emissions and medial olivocochlear reflex in female adults?
Eren E; Harman E; Arslanoğlu S; Önal K; Katlmiş H
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jul; 34(5):784-9. PubMed ID: 23770686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of static middle ear pressure on transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion products.
Plinkert PK; Bootz F; Vossieck T
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1994; 251(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 8024768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Olivocochlear efferent vs. middle-ear contributions to the alteration of otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise.
Büki B; Wit HP; Avan P
Brain Res; 2000 Jan; 852(1):140-50. PubMed ID: 10661505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efferent-mediated reduction in cochlear gain does not alter tuning estimates from stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission group delays.
Bhagat SP; Kilgore C
Neurosci Lett; 2014 Jan; 559():132-5. PubMed ID: 24333175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Distortion product emissions in humans. II. Relations to acoustic immittance and stimulus frequency and spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing subjects.
Lonsbury-Martin BL; Harris FP; Stagner BB; Hawkins MD; Martin GK
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1990 May; 147():15-29. PubMed ID: 2110796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
Zhao W; Dhar S
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2010 Mar; 11(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 19798532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Frequency tuning of medial-olivocochlear-efferent acoustic reflexes in humans as functions of probe frequency.
Lilaonitkul W; Guinan JJ
J Neurophysiol; 2012 Mar; 107(6):1598-611. PubMed ID: 22190630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efferent modulation of pre-neural and neural distortion products.
Smith SB; Ichiba K; Velenovsky DS; Cone B
Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 356():25-34. PubMed ID: 29122423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
