These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2013546)

  • 21. Inferior colliculus stimulation causes similar efferent effects on ipsilateral and contralateral cochlear potentials in the guinea pig.
    Zhang W; Dolan DF
    Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 1081(1):138-49. PubMed ID: 16500626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A multifrequency method for determining cochlear efferent activity.
    Luebke AE; Foster PK; Stagner BB
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2002 Mar; 3(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 12083721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Central auditory pathways mediating the rat middle ear muscle reflexes.
    Lee DJ; de Venecia RK; Guinan JJ; Brown MC
    Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol; 2006 Apr; 288(4):358-69. PubMed ID: 16550576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Repeatability of click-evoked otoacoustic emission-based medial olivocochlear efferent assay.
    Mishra SK; Lutman ME
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 23739244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Changes in spontaneous otoacoustic emissions produced by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear.
    Mott JB; Norton SJ; Neely ST; Warr WB
    Hear Res; 1989 Apr; 38(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 2708165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables.
    Veuillet E; Collet L; Duclaux R
    J Neurophysiol; 1991 Mar; 65(3):724-35. PubMed ID: 2051201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Establishing critical differences in ear-canal stimulus amplitude for detecting middle ear muscle reflex activation during olivocochlear efferent measurements.
    Mertes IB
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Feb; 59(2):140-147. PubMed ID: 31584306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Long-term moderate noise exposure enhances the medial olivocochlear reflex.
    Yin D; Ren L; Li J; Shi Y; Duan Y; Xie Y; Zhang T; Dai P
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2020 Oct; 47(5):769-777. PubMed ID: 32404262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Human medial olivocochlear reflex: effects as functions of contralateral, ipsilateral, and bilateral elicitor bandwidths.
    Lilaonitkul W; Guinan JJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 10(3):459-70. PubMed ID: 19263165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Olivocochlear reflex effect on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions is largest at frequencies with distinct fine structure dips.
    Wagner W; Heppelmann G; Müller J; Janssen T; Zenner HP
    Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):83-92. PubMed ID: 17137736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure is responsible for variability of distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression.
    Sun XM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4310-20. PubMed ID: 18537382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of contralateral white noise stimulation on transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions in patients with acoustic neuroma.
    Maurer J; Hinni M; Beck A; Mann W
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1995 Mar; 112(3):369-74. PubMed ID: 7870435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The medial olivocochlear reflex strength is modulated during a visual working memory task.
    Marcenaro B; Leiva A; Dragicevic C; López V; Delano PH
    J Neurophysiol; 2021 Jun; 125(6):2309-2321. PubMed ID: 33978484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Contralateral acoustic stimulation modulates low-frequency biasing of DPOAE: efferent influence on cochlear amplifier operating state?
    Abel C; Wittekindt A; Kössl M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 101(5):2362-71. PubMed ID: 19279155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Could the Use of Acoustic Reflexes Prior to Administering Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAEs) Affect the Results of DPOAEs?
    Garrette R; Jones AL; Wilson MW
    Am J Audiol; 2018 Sep; 27(3):349-353. PubMed ID: 29800116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sound-evoked efferent effects on cochlear mechanics of the mustached bat.
    Drexl M; Kössl M
    Hear Res; 2003 Oct; 184(1-2):61-74. PubMed ID: 14553904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Olivocochlear efferents: anatomy, physiology, function, and the measurement of efferent effects in humans.
    Guinan JJ
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):589-607. PubMed ID: 17086072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Stronger efferent suppression of cochlear neural potentials by contralateral acoustic stimulation in awake than in anesthetized chinchilla.
    Aedo C; Tapia E; Pavez E; Elgueda D; Delano PH; Robles L
    Front Syst Neurosci; 2015; 9():21. PubMed ID: 25784861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Frequency tuning of the contralateral medial olivocochlear reflex in humans.
    Zhao W; Dhar S
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Jul; 108(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 22457463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Slow variation of the amplitude of acoustic distortion at f2-f1 in awake rabbits.
    Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
    Hear Res; 1991 Feb; 51(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 2032963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.