These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20135944)

  • 41. Survey of medical student preference for simulation models for basic dermatologic surgery skills: simulation platforms in medical education.
    Adams CC; Marquart JD; Nicholas LL; Sperling LC; Meyerle JH
    Dermatol Surg; 2014 Apr; 40(4):427-35. PubMed ID: 24460761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Teaching project: a low-cost swine model for chest tube insertion training.
    Netto FA; Sommer CG; Constantino Mde M; Cardoso M; Cipriani RF; Pereira RA
    Rev Col Bras Cir; 2016 Feb; 43(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 27096859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A novel simulation model for tube thoracostomy.
    Kouyoumjian S; Velilla MA; Paxton JH
    SAGE Open Med; 2023; 11():20503121231178336. PubMed ID: 37324122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. An anatomically sound surgical simulation model for myringotomy and tympanostomy tube insertion.
    Hong P; Webb AN; Corsten G; Balderston J; Haworth R; Ritchie K; Massoud E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Mar; 78(3):522-9. PubMed ID: 24485178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effectiveness of intermediate-fidelity simulation training technology in undergraduate nursing education.
    Alinier G; Hunt B; Gordon R; Harwood C
    J Adv Nurs; 2006 May; 54(3):359-69. PubMed ID: 16629920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Simulation-based training to improve acute care skills in medical undergraduates.
    Weller J; Robinson B; Larsen P; Caldwell C
    N Z Med J; 2004 Oct; 117(1204):U1119. PubMed ID: 15505666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Individual skill progression on a virtual reality simulator for shoulder arthroscopy: a 3-year follow-up study.
    Gomoll AH; Pappas G; Forsythe B; Warner JJ
    Am J Sports Med; 2008 Jun; 36(6):1139-42. PubMed ID: 18326032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Teaching suturing and knot-tying skills to medical students: a randomized controlled study comparing computer-based video instruction and (concurrent and summary) expert feedback.
    Xeroulis GJ; Park J; Moulton CA; Reznick RK; Leblanc V; Dubrowski A
    Surgery; 2007 Apr; 141(4):442-9. PubMed ID: 17383520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of training on two laparoscopic simulators and assessment of skills transfer to surgical performance.
    Youngblood PL; Srivastava S; Curet M; Heinrichs WL; Dev P; Wren SM
    J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Apr; 200(4):546-51. PubMed ID: 15804468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Validation of computer simulation training for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: Pilot study.
    Sedlack RE
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Aug; 22(8):1214-9. PubMed ID: 17559386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Virtual ureteroscopy predicts ureteroscopic proficiency of medical students on a cadaver.
    Ogan K; Jacomides L; Shulman MJ; Roehrborn CG; Cadeddu JA; Pearle MS
    J Urol; 2004 Aug; 172(2):667-71. PubMed ID: 15247757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Training neonatal skills with simulators?
    Cavaleiro AP; Guimarães H; Calheiros F
    Acta Paediatr; 2009 Apr; 98(4):636-9. PubMed ID: 19120041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Excellence in performance and stress reduction during two different full scale simulator training courses: a pilot study.
    Müller MP; Hänsel M; Fichtner A; Hardt F; Weber S; Kirschbaum C; Rüder S; Walcher F; Koch T; Eich C
    Resuscitation; 2009 Aug; 80(8):919-24. PubMed ID: 19467753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Construct validity of the endoscopic sinus surgery simulator: II. Assessment of discriminant validity and expert benchmarking.
    Fried MP; Sadoughi B; Weghorst SJ; Zeltsan M; Cuellar H; Uribe JI; Sasaki CT; Ross DA; Jacobs JB; Lebowitz RA; Satava RM
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Apr; 133(4):350-7. PubMed ID: 17438249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Evaluation of an emergency-procedure teaching laboratory for the development of proficiency in tube thoracostomy.
    Homan CS; Viccellio P; Thode HC; Fisher W
    Acad Emerg Med; 1994; 1(4):382-7. PubMed ID: 7614286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of self-efficacy and its improvement after artificial simulator or live animal model emergency procedure training.
    Hall AB; Riojas R; Sharon D
    Mil Med; 2014 Mar; 179(3):320-3. PubMed ID: 24594468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Development of a nasogastric tube insertion simulator: a collaborative interdisciplinary effort.
    Summer L; Gonzalez L; Jimeno M; Christensen K
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2009; 27(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 21685836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Development of a training model for small animal thoracocentesis and chest tube thoracostomy.
    Williamson JA; Fio Rito RM
    Altern Lab Anim; 2014 Jun; 42(3):201-5. PubMed ID: 25068931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Tube thoracostomy training with a medical simulator is associated with faster, more successful performance of the procedure.
    Chung TN; Kim SW; You JS; Chung HS
    Clin Exp Emerg Med; 2016 Mar; 3(1):16-19. PubMed ID: 27752610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Objective comparison of animal training versus artificial simulation for initial cricothyroidotomy training.
    Iverson K; Riojas R; Sharon D; Hall AB
    Am Surg; 2015 May; 81(5):515-8. PubMed ID: 25975338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.