These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20136174)

  • 1. Effects of stimulus duration on amplitude modulation processing with cochlear implants.
    Luo X; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):EL23-9. PubMed ID: 20136174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech recognition and temporal amplitude modulation processing by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.
    Luo X; Fu QJ; Wei CG; Cao KL
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):957-70. PubMed ID: 18818548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A method to dynamically control unwanted loudness cues when measuring amplitude modulation detection in cochlear implant users.
    Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Oba S; Başkent D
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Jan; 222():207-12. PubMed ID: 24269251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rate modulation detection thresholds for cochlear implant users.
    Brochier T; McKay C; McDermott H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Feb; 143(2):1214. PubMed ID: 29495682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Psychophysical measures from electrical stimulation of the human cochlear nucleus.
    Shannon RV; Otto SR
    Hear Res; 1990 Aug; 47(1-2):159-68. PubMed ID: 2228792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modulation rate discrimination using half-wave rectified and sinusoidally amplitude modulated stimuli in cochlear-implant users.
    Kreft HA; Oxenham AJ; Nelson DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):656-9. PubMed ID: 20136187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of modulation wave shape on modulation frequency discrimination with electrical hearing.
    Landsberger DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):EL21-7. PubMed ID: 18681497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spectro-temporal cues enhance modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Zheng Y; Escabí M; Litovsky RY
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():45-54. PubMed ID: 28601530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mismatch negativity (MMN) objectively reflects timbre discrimination thresholds in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
    Rahne T; Plontke SK; Wagner L
    Brain Res; 2014 Oct; 1586():143-51. PubMed ID: 25152464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modulation frequency discrimination with single and multiple channels in cochlear implant users.
    Galvin JJ; Oba S; Başkent D; Fu QJ
    Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 324():7-18. PubMed ID: 25746914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simultaneous masking between electric and acoustic stimulation in cochlear implant users with residual low-frequency hearing.
    Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():185-196. PubMed ID: 28688755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychoacoustic abilities associated with music perception in cochlear implant users.
    Won JH; Drennan WR; Kang RS; Rubinstein JT
    Ear Hear; 2010 Dec; 31(6):796-805. PubMed ID: 20595901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implants.
    Shannon RV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2156-64. PubMed ID: 1597606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A relation between electrode discrimination and amplitude modulation detection by cochlear implant listeners.
    Chatterjee M; Yu J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jan; 127(1):415-26. PubMed ID: 20058987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Isolating spectral cues in amplitude and quasi-frequency modulation discrimination by reducing stimulus duration.
    Borucki E; Berg BG
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():129-133. PubMed ID: 28284735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of stimulation rate and loudness growth on modulation detection and intensity discrimination in cochlear implant users.
    Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
    Hear Res; 2009 Apr; 250(1-2):46-54. PubMed ID: 19450432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Envelope Interactions in Multi-Channel Amplitude Modulation Frequency Discrimination by Cochlear Implant Users.
    Galvin JJ; Oba SI; Başkent D; Chatterjee M; Fu QJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139546. PubMed ID: 26431043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electric-acoustic forward masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
    Imsiecke M; Krüger B; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():25-37. PubMed ID: 29673567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.