These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20136176)

  • 1. Recognition of interrupted sentences under conditions of spectral degradation.
    Chatterjee M; Peredo F; Nelson D; Başkent D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):EL37-41. PubMed ID: 20136176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Top-Down Processes in Simulated Electric-Acoustic Hearing: The Effect of Linguistic Context on Bimodal Benefit for Temporally Interrupted Speech.
    Oh SH; Donaldson GS; Kong YY
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 27007220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic cue integration in speech intonation recognition with cochlear implants.
    Peng SC; Chatterjee M; Lu N
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Jun; 16(2):67-82. PubMed ID: 22790392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recognition of temporally interrupted and spectrally degraded sentences with additional unprocessed low-frequency speech.
    Başkent D; Chatterjee M
    Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 270(1-2):127-33. PubMed ID: 20817081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
    Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Baskent D; Wang X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pitch and spectral resolution: A systematic comparison of bottom-up cues for top-down repair of degraded speech.
    Clarke J; Başkent D; Gaudrain E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jan; 139(1):395-405. PubMed ID: 26827034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multimodal and Spectral Degradation Effects on Speech and Emotion Recognition in Adult Listeners.
    Ritter C; Vongpaisal T
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518804966. PubMed ID: 30378469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of speech degradation on top-down repair: phonemic restoration with simulations of cochlear implants and combined electric-acoustic stimulation.
    Başkent D
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2012 Oct; 13(5):683-92. PubMed ID: 22569838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spectral and temporal resolutions of information-bearing acoustic changes for understanding vocoded sentences.
    Stilp CE; Goupell MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):844-55. PubMed ID: 25698018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Making Sense of Sentences: Top-Down Processing of Speech by Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    Moberly AC; Reed J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Aug; 62(8):2895-2905. PubMed ID: 31330118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Voice emotion recognition by cochlear-implanted children and their normally-hearing peers.
    Chatterjee M; Zion DJ; Deroche ML; Burianek BA; Limb CJ; Goren AP; Kulkarni AM; Christensen JA
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():151-62. PubMed ID: 25448167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
    Nelson PB; Jin SH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 May; 115(5 Pt 1):2286-94. PubMed ID: 15139640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gated Word Recognition by Postlingually Deafened Adults With Cochlear Implants: Influence of Semantic Context.
    Patro C; Mendel LL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Jan; 61(1):145-158. PubMed ID: 29242894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Top-down restoration of speech in cochlear-implant users.
    Bhargava P; Gaudrain E; Başkent D
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():113-23. PubMed ID: 24368138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transfer of auditory perceptual learning with spectrally reduced speech to speech and nonspeech tasks: implications for cochlear implants.
    Loebach JL; Pisoni DB; Svirsky MA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):662-74. PubMed ID: 19773659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recognition of spectrally degraded phonemes by younger, middle-aged, and older normal-hearing listeners.
    Schvartz KC; Chatterjee M; Gordon-Salant S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3972-88. PubMed ID: 19206821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of ).
    Roman AS; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Faulkner KF
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):344-356. PubMed ID: 28045787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of room acoustic parameters on speech and music perception among participants with cochlear implants.
    Eurich B; Klenzner T; Oehler M
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():122-132. PubMed ID: 30933704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Time-compression thresholds for Mandarin sentences in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Meng Q; Wang X; Cai Y; Kong F; Buck AN; Yu G; Zheng N; Schnupp JWH
    Hear Res; 2019 Mar; 374():58-68. PubMed ID: 30732921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Intelligibility of Interrupted Speech: Cochlear Implant Users and Normal Hearing Listeners.
    Bhargava P; Gaudrain E; Başkent D
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Oct; 17(5):475-91. PubMed ID: 27090115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.