141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20136187)
1. Modulation rate discrimination using half-wave rectified and sinusoidally amplitude modulated stimuli in cochlear-implant users.
Kreft HA; Oxenham AJ; Nelson DA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):656-9. PubMed ID: 20136187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterizing the relationship between modulation sensitivity and pitch resolution in cochlear implant users.
Camarena A; Goldsworthy RL
Hear Res; 2024 Jul; 448():109026. PubMed ID: 38776706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modulation frequency discrimination with modulated and unmodulated interference in normal hearing and in cochlear-implant users.
Kreft HA; Nelson DA; Oxenham AJ
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Aug; 14(4):591-601. PubMed ID: 23632651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees.
Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variations in carrier pulse rate and the perception of amplitude modulation in cochlear implant users.
Green T; Faulkner A; Rosen S
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 22367093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Responses of neurons in the feline inferior colliculus to modulated electrical stimuli applied on and within the ventral cochlear nucleus; Implications for an advanced auditory brainstem implant.
McCreery D; Yadev K; Han M
Hear Res; 2018 Jun; 363():85-97. PubMed ID: 29573880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pitch percepts associated with amplitude-modulated current pulse trains in cochlear implantees.
McKay CM; McDermott HJ; Clark GM
J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Nov; 96(5 Pt 1):2664-73. PubMed ID: 7983272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of modulation wave shape on modulation frequency discrimination with electrical hearing.
Landsberger DM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):EL21-7. PubMed ID: 18681497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rate pitch discrimination in cochlear implant users with the use of double pulses and different interpulse intervals.
Pieper SH; Bahmer A
Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Nov; 20(6):312-323. PubMed ID: 31448701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interaural time discrimination of envelopes carried on high-frequency tones as a function of level and interaural carrier mismatch.
Blanks DA; Buss E; Grose JH; Fitzpatrick DC; Hall JW
Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):674-83. PubMed ID: 18596646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Enhancement of temporal periodicity cues in cochlear implants: effects on prosodic perception and vowel identification.
Green T; Faulkner A; Rosen S; Macherey O
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Jul; 118(1):375-85. PubMed ID: 16119358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electric-acoustic forward masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
Imsiecke M; Krüger B; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():25-37. PubMed ID: 29673567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Encoding a Melody Using Only Temporal Information for Cochlear-Implant and Normal-Hearing Listeners.
Todd AE; Mertens G; Van de Heyning P; Landsberger DM
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517739745. PubMed ID: 29161987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Auditory cortex phase locking to amplitude-modulated cochlear implant pulse trains.
Middlebrooks JC
J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jul; 100(1):76-91. PubMed ID: 18367697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dual temporal pitch percepts from acoustic and electric amplitude-modulated pulse trains.
McKay CM; Carlyon RP
J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jan; 105(1):347-57. PubMed ID: 9921661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electric-acoustic pitch comparisons in single-sided-deaf cochlear implant users: frequency-place functions and rate pitch.
Schatzer R; Vermeire K; Visser D; Krenmayr A; Kals M; Voormolen M; Van de Heyning P; Zierhofer C
Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():26-35. PubMed ID: 24252455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Simultaneous masking between electric and acoustic stimulation in cochlear implant users with residual low-frequency hearing.
Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():185-196. PubMed ID: 28688755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of stimulus level and place of stimulation on temporal pitch perception by cochlear implant users.
Carlyon RP; Lynch C; Deeks JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):2997-3008. PubMed ID: 21117749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Free field frequency discrimination abilities of cochlear implant users.
Pretorius LL; Hanekom JJ
Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):77-84. PubMed ID: 18692556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
