These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20136219)

  • 1. Sensitization to masked tones following notched-noise correlates with estimates of cochlear function using distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Zhou X; Henin S; Thompson SE; Long GR; Parra LC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):970-6. PubMed ID: 20136219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cochlear nonlinearity in normal-hearing subjects as inferred psychophysically and from distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Johannesen PT; Lopez-Poveda EA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2149-63. PubMed ID: 19062855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impaired cochlear function correlates with the presence of tinnitus and its estimated spectral profile.
    Zhou X; Henin S; Long GR; Parra LC
    Hear Res; 2011 Jul; 277(1-2):107-16. PubMed ID: 21376109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contralateral acoustic stimulation modulates low-frequency biasing of DPOAE: efferent influence on cochlear amplifier operating state?
    Abel C; Wittekindt A; Kössl M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 101(5):2362-71. PubMed ID: 19279155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of contralateral pure tone stimulation on distortion emissions suggests a frequency-specific functioning of the efferent cochlear control.
    Althen H; Wittekindt A; Gaese B; Kössl M; Abel C
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Apr; 107(7):1962-9. PubMed ID: 22262828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Compression estimates using behavioral and otoacoustic emission measures.
    Williams EJ; Bacon SP
    Hear Res; 2005 Mar; 201(1-2):44-54. PubMed ID: 15721560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and cochlear microphonics: relationships in patients with and without endolymphatic hydrops.
    Fetterman BL
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Jun; 111(6):946-54. PubMed ID: 11404602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative analysis of cochlear active mechanisms in tinnitus subjects with normal hearing sensitivity: multiparametric recording of evoked otoacoustic emissions and contralateral suppression.
    Paglialonga A; Del Bo L; Ravazzani P; Tognola G
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2010 Jun; 37(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 19879078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of contralateral acoustic stimulation on the quadratic distortion product f2-f1 in humans.
    Wittekindt A; Gaese BH; Kössl M
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 18951964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Behaviors of cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions evoked by amplitude modulated tones.
    Bian L; Chen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):828-39. PubMed ID: 21361441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in an industrial setting.
    Korres GS; Balatsouras DG; Tzagaroulakis A; Kandiloros D; Ferekidou E; Korres S
    Noise Health; 2009; 11(43):103-10. PubMed ID: 19414930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Specific findings in distortion product otoacoustic emissions and growth functions with chronic tinnitus.
    Hesse G; Schaaf H; Laubert A
    Int Tinnitus J; 2005; 11(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 16419682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in neonates and effect of contralateral white noise stimulation.
    Franz B; Altidis P; Altidis B
    Int Tinnitus J; 2000; 6(2):168-71. PubMed ID: 14689637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modulation of auditory percepts by transcutaneous electrical stimulation.
    Ueberfuhr MA; Braun A; Wiegrebe L; Grothe B; Drexl M
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():235-243. PubMed ID: 28323018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of occupational noise on pure-tone threshold and distortion product otoacoustic emissions after one workday.
    Müller J; Janssen T
    Hear Res; 2008 Dec; 246(1-2):9-22. PubMed ID: 18848612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling cochlear dynamics: interrelation between cochlea mechanics and psychoacoustics.
    Epp B; Verhey JL; Mauermann M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1870-83. PubMed ID: 20968359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efferent-induced change in human cochlear compression and its influence on masking of tones.
    Bhagat SP; Carter PH
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Nov; 485(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 20813158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Age-related declines in distortion product otoacoustic emissions utilizing pure tone contralateral stimulation in CBA/CaJ mice.
    Varghese GI; Zhu X; Frisina RD
    Hear Res; 2005 Nov; 209(1-2):60-7. PubMed ID: 16061336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.