These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20136219)

  • 21. The evaluation of noise-induced hearing loss with distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Balatsouras DG
    Med Sci Monit; 2004 May; 10(5):CR218-22. PubMed ID: 15114273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Modification of otoacoustic emissions following ear-level exposure to MP3 player music.
    Bhagat SP; Davis AM
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Dec; 47(12):751-60. PubMed ID: 19085399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sensitive response to low-frequency cochlear distortion products in the auditory midbrain.
    Abel C; Kössl M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 101(3):1560-74. PubMed ID: 19036870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Distortion products in Menière's disease].
    Ralli G; Cianfrone G; Fabbricatore M; Altissimi G; Musacchio A
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1994; 14(5):513-23. PubMed ID: 7856452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sources and mechanisms of DPOAE generation: implications for the prediction of auditory sensitivity.
    Shaffer LA; Withnell RH; Dhar S; Lilly DJ; Goodman SS; Harmon KM
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):367-79. PubMed ID: 14534408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of cochlear function in patients with normal hearing and tinnitus: a distortion product otoacoustic emission study.
    Satar B; Kapkin O; Ozkaptan Y
    Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2003 May; 10(5):177-82. PubMed ID: 12970589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and tympanometric measurements in an adult population-based study.
    Uchida Y; Ando F; Nakata S; Ueda H; Nakashima T; Niino N; Shimokata H
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2006 Dec; 33(4):397-401. PubMed ID: 16753276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Screening of deafness in the young child. Value, techniques and initial results of products of acoustic distortion].
    Bonfils P; Avan P; François M; Loundon N; Elbez M; Trotoux J; Narcy P
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1993; 110(1):3-8; discussion 8-9. PubMed ID: 8317861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of centrifugal pathways on responses of cochlear nucleus neurons to signals in noise.
    Mulders WH; Seluakumaran K; Robertson D
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 27(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 18279322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Otoacoustic emissions without somatic motility: can stereocilia mechanics drive the mammalian cochlea?
    Liberman MC; Zuo J; Guinan JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Sep; 116(3):1649-55. PubMed ID: 15478431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Transient evoked otoacoustic emission latency and estimates of cochlear tuning in preterm neonates.
    Moleti A; Sisto R; Paglialonga A; Sibella F; Anteunis L; Parazzini M; Tognola G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):2984-94. PubMed ID: 19045786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in an animal model of induced hyperinsulinemia.
    Zuma e Maia FC; Lavinsky L
    Int Tinnitus J; 2006; 12(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 17260878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of broadband and narrowband contralateral noise on psychophysical tuning curves and otoacoustic emissions.
    Wicher A; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 May; 135(5):2931-41. PubMed ID: 24815273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cochlear compression: effects of low-frequency biasing on quadratic distortion product otoacoustic emission.
    Bian L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Dec; 116(6):3559-71. PubMed ID: 15658707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Stimulus characteristics which lessen the impact of threshold fine structure on estimates of hearing status.
    Lee J; Long G
    Hear Res; 2012 Jan; 283(1-2):24-32. PubMed ID: 22178980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Frequency specificity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions produced by high-level tones despite inefficient cochlear electromechanical feedback.
    Carvalho S; Mom T; Gilain L; Avan P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Sep; 116(3):1639-48. PubMed ID: 15478430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cochlear Function Monitoring after Spinal Anesthesia.
    Janecka-Placek A; Lisowska G; Paradysz A; Misiołek H
    Med Sci Monit; 2015 Sep; 21():2767-73. PubMed ID: 26377393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of cochlear function in mice: distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Martin GK; Stagner BB; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    Curr Protoc Neurosci; 2006 Feb; Chapter 8():Unit8.21C. PubMed ID: 18428646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Tinnitus and Auditory Perception After a History of Noise Exposure: Relationship to Auditory Brainstem Response Measures.
    Bramhall NF; Konrad-Martin D; McMillan GP
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):881-894. PubMed ID: 29337762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Use of psychometric-function slopes for forward-masked tones to investigate cochlear nonlinearity.
    Schairer KS; Messersmith J; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2196-215. PubMed ID: 19062859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.