These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20136225)

  • 41. Compensatory responses to loudness-shifted voice feedback during production of Mandarin speech.
    Liu H; Zhang Q; Xu Y; Larson CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2405-12. PubMed ID: 17902874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Artificial pitch changing in auditory feedback as a possible method in voice training and therapy.
    Laukkanen AM
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1994; 46(2):86-96. PubMed ID: 8173617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. ERP correlates of the magnitude of pitch errors detected in the human voice.
    Scheerer NE; Behich J; Liu H; Jones JA
    Neuroscience; 2013 Jun; 240():176-85. PubMed ID: 23466810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Selective and divided attention modulates auditory-vocal integration in the processing of pitch feedback errors.
    Liu Y; Hu H; Jones JA; Guo Z; Li W; Chen X; Liu P; Liu H
    Eur J Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 42(3):1895-904. PubMed ID: 25969928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The role of creaky voice in Cantonese tonal perception.
    Yu KM; Lam HW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1320. PubMed ID: 25190405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effects of simultaneous perturbations of voice pitch and loudness feedback on voice F0 and amplitude control.
    Larson CR; Sun J; Hain TC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 May; 121(5 Pt1):2862-72. PubMed ID: 17550185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Regional homogeneity of intrinsic brain activity correlates with auditory-motor processing of vocal pitch errors.
    Guo Z; Huang X; Wang M; Jones JA; Dai Z; Li W; Liu P; Liu H
    Neuroimage; 2016 Nov; 142():565-575. PubMed ID: 27502049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The Interaction of Surface Hydration and Vocal Loading on Voice Measures.
    Fujiki RB; Chapleau A; Sundarrajan A; McKenna V; Sivasankar MP
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):211-217. PubMed ID: 27522343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Vocal Performance of Group Fitness Instructors Before and After Instruction: Changes in Acoustic Measures and Self-Ratings.
    Dallaston K; Rumbach AF
    J Voice; 2016 Jan; 30(1):127.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25795364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Vocalic correlates of pitch in whispered versus normal speech.
    Heeren WF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3800-10. PubMed ID: 26723334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Neural networks involved in voluntary and involuntary vocal pitch regulation in experienced singers.
    Zarate JM; Wood S; Zatorre RJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(2):607-18. PubMed ID: 19896958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effect of Two Isolated Vocal-facilitating Techniques Chant Talk and Pitch Inflections on the Phonation of Female Speech-language Pathology Students: A Pilot Study.
    Meerschman I; Bettens K; Dejagere S; Tetaert L; D'haeseleer E; Claeys S; Van Lierde K
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):771.e17-771.e25. PubMed ID: 26725548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The contribution of phonation type to the perception of vocal emotions in German: an articulatory synthesis study.
    Birkholz P; Martin L; Willmes K; Kröger BJ; Neuschaefer-Rube C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1503-12. PubMed ID: 25786961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Principal component analysis reveals differential attentional modulation of the vocal response to pitch perturbation.
    Okazaki S; Mori K; Okada M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jul; 136(1):334-40. PubMed ID: 24993217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of frequency-shifted feedback on the pitch of vocal productions.
    ELman JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Jul; 70(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 7264071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Acoustic analysis of voice in normal and high pitch phonation: a comparative study.
    Aithal VU; Bellur R; John S; Varghese C; Guddattu V
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2012; 64(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 22076072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The predictability of frequency-altered auditory feedback changes the weighting of feedback and feedforward input for speech motor control.
    Scheerer NE; Jones JA
    Eur J Neurosci; 2014 Dec; 40(12):3793-806. PubMed ID: 25263844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Neurophysiological evidence of differential mechanisms involved in producing opposing and following responses to altered auditory feedback.
    Li W; Chen Z; Liu P; Zhang B; Huang D; Liu H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Nov; 124(11):2161-71. PubMed ID: 23751154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Adaptation to pitch-altered feedback is independent of one's own voice pitch sensitivity.
    Alemi R; Lehmann A; Deroche MLD
    Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):16860. PubMed ID: 33033324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The Effect of Telephone Transmission on Voice Quality Perception.
    Passetti RR; Constantini AC
    J Voice; 2019 Sep; 33(5):649-658. PubMed ID: 30146232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.