These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20136227)

  • 1. Compensations in response to real-time formant perturbations of different magnitudes.
    MacDonald EN; Goldberg R; Munhall KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):1059-68. PubMed ID: 20136227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A cross-language study of compensation in response to real-time formant perturbation.
    Mitsuya T; Macdonald EN; Purcell DW; Munhall KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2978-86. PubMed ID: 22087926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Probing the independence of formant control using altered auditory feedback.
    MacDonald EN; Purcell DW; Munhall KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):955-65. PubMed ID: 21361452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of vowel perceptual cues in compensatory responses to perturbations of speech auditory feedback.
    Reilly KJ; Dougherty KE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1314-23. PubMed ID: 23927128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Language dependent vowel representation in speech production.
    Mitsuya T; Samson F; Ménard L; Munhall KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):2993-3003. PubMed ID: 23654403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception.
    Villacorta VM; Perkell JS; Guenther FH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2306-19. PubMed ID: 17902866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Compensatory Responses to Formant Perturbations Proportionally Decrease as Perturbations Increase.
    Daliri A; Chao SC; Fitzgerald LC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Oct; 63(10):3392-3407. PubMed ID: 32976078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Talkers alter vowel production in response to real-time formant perturbation even when instructed not to compensate.
    Munhall KG; MacDonald EN; Byrne SK; Johnsrude I
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jan; 125(1):384-90. PubMed ID: 19173425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Occlusion effect on compensatory formant production and voice amplitude in response to real-time perturbation.
    Mitsuya T; Purcell DW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Dec; 140(6):4017. PubMed ID: 28040002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perturbing the consistency of auditory feedback in speech.
    Nault DR; Mitsuya T; Purcell DW; Munhall KG
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():905365. PubMed ID: 36092651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Response patterns to vowel formant perturbations in children.
    Cheung ST; Thompson K; Chen JL; Yunusova Y; Beal DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Oct; 150(4):2647. PubMed ID: 34717445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adaptive control of vowel formant frequency: evidence from real-time formant manipulation.
    Purcell DW; Munhall KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Aug; 120(2):966-77. PubMed ID: 16938984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acoustical-perceptual correlates of "whisper pitch" in synthetically generated vowels.
    Higashikawa M; Minifie FD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Jun; 42(3):583-91. PubMed ID: 10391624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech compensation for time-scale-modified auditory feedback.
    Ogane R; Honda M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 57(2):S616-25. PubMed ID: 24686511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensorimotor control of vocal pitch and formant frequencies in Parkinson's disease.
    Mollaei F; Shiller DM; Baum SR; Gracco VL
    Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 1646():269-277. PubMed ID: 27288701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of auditory feedback deprivation length on the vowel /epsilon/ produced by pediatric cochlear-implant users.
    Bharadwaj SV; Graves AG; Bauer DD; Assmann PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 May; 121(5 Pt1):EL196-202. PubMed ID: 17550203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of real-time cochlear implant simulation on speech production.
    Casserly ED
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2791-800. PubMed ID: 25994707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Compensation following real-time manipulation of formants in isolated vowels.
    Purcell DW; Munhall KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2288-97. PubMed ID: 16642842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Articulatory compensation for low-pass filtered formant-altered auditory feedback.
    Uezu Y; Hiroya S; Mochida T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Jul; 150(1):64. PubMed ID: 34340472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Formant-frequency variation and its effects on across-formant grouping in speech perception.
    Roberts B; Summers RJ; Bailey PJ
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():323-31. PubMed ID: 23716238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.