156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20136228)
1. A mathematical model of vowel identification by users of cochlear implants.
Sagi E; Meyer TA; Kaiser AR; Teoh SW; Svirsky MA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):1069-83. PubMed ID: 20136228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Saliency of Vowel Features in Neural Responses of Cochlear Implant Users.
Prévost F; Lehmann A
Clin EEG Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 49(6):388-397. PubMed ID: 29690785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Information theoretic evaluation of a noiseband-based cochlear implant simulator.
Aguiar DE; Taylor NE; Li J; Gazanfari DK; Talavage TM; Laflen JB; Neuberger H; Svirsky MA
Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():185-193. PubMed ID: 26409068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimum spectral contrast needed for vowel identification by normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
Loizou PC; Poroy O
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1619-27. PubMed ID: 11572371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Timbre and speech perception in bimodal and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.
Kong YY; Mullangi A; Marozeau J
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):645-59. PubMed ID: 22677814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contribution of formant frequency information to vowel perception in steady-state noise by cochlear implant users.
Sagi E; Svirsky MA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):1027. PubMed ID: 28253672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A mathematical model of medial consonant identification by cochlear implant users.
Svirsky MA; Sagi E; Meyer TA; Kaiser AR; Teoh SW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2191-200. PubMed ID: 21476674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Psychoacoustic and phoneme identification measures in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.
Goldsworthy RL; Delhorne LA; Braida LD; Reed CM
Trends Amplif; 2013 Mar; 17(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 23429419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The relative phonetic contributions of a cochlear implant and residual acoustic hearing to bimodal speech perception.
Sheffield BM; Zeng FG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):518-30. PubMed ID: 22280613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spectral modulation detection and vowel and consonant identifications in cochlear implant listeners.
Saoji AA; Litvak L; Spahr AJ; Eddins DA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):955-8. PubMed ID: 19739707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vowel perception: experiments with a single-electrode cochlear implant.
Doyle KJ; Danhauer JL; Edgerton BJ
J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):179-92. PubMed ID: 3755193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Processing of speech temporal and spectral information by users of auditory brainstem implants and cochlear implants.
Azadpour M; McKay CM
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(5):e192-203. PubMed ID: 25010634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vowel identification by cochlear implant users: Contributions of duration cues and dynamic spectral cues.
Donaldson GS; Rogers CL; Johnson LB; Oh SH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 26233007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rate and onset cues can improve cochlear implant synthetic vowel recognition in noise.
Mc Laughlin M; Reilly RB; Zeng FG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1546-60. PubMed ID: 23464025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of static and dynamic vowel cues by multichannel cochlear implant users.
Kirk KI; Tye-Murray N; Hurtig RR
J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3487-98. PubMed ID: 1619125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vowel identification by cochlear implant users: contributions of static and dynamic spectral cues.
Donaldson GS; Rogers CL; Cardenas ES; Russell BA; Hanna NH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3021-8. PubMed ID: 24116437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Synthetic vowel studies on cochlear implant patients.
Tong YC; Lim HH; Clark GM
J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Sep; 84(3):876-87. PubMed ID: 3183206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
