These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. The importance of collaboration. Lee N J Hum Lact; 2003 Nov; 19(4):362. PubMed ID: 14620447 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantifying the Impact of Common Feeding Interventions on Nutritive Sucking Performance Using a Commercially Available Smart Bottle. Capilouto GJ; Cunningham TJ; Desai N J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2019; 33(4):331-339. PubMed ID: 31651627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does the choice of bottle nipple affect the oral feeding performance of very-low-birthweight (VLBW) infants? Scheel CE; Schanler RJ; Lau C Acta Paediatr; 2005 Sep; 94(9):1266-72. PubMed ID: 16203676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sucking behaviour using feeding teats with and without an anticolic system: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Kreitschmann M; Epping LC; Hohoff A; Sauerland C; Stamm T BMC Pediatr; 2018 Mar; 18(1):115. PubMed ID: 29548311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Physiologic sucking performance and the shape of the oral cavity in infants and young children with respect to the design of nipples for nursing bottles and pacifiers]. Hummel S; Herrmann B Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1989 Oct; 50(5):384-91. PubMed ID: 2583621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Understanding the Infant Feeding Decision. Smith TR Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2015; (113):53-4. PubMed ID: 26309937 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Sucking patterns of neonates during bottle feeding: comparison of different nipple units. Mathew OP; Belan M; Thoppil CK Am J Perinatol; 1992 Jul; 9(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 1627217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]